Media Spin and the Privatization of U.S. Wars

America’s international affairs are associated with websites like Google, Facebook and the Otpor! organization, which spread chaos in Serbia by calling upon the rebels to overthrow the regime. The New York Times refers to a report from April 15 written by Ron Nixon stating that American trainees teach the youth to use communication to hurl them into what is called “ revolutions.”

American tactics often rely on taking advantage of the victims and igniting the crisis through armed capitalists. The Babto World Post* accused the Rothschilds, the Zionists who had founded the International Crisis Group, of spending money to ignite chaos in Arabic countries. This is a Zionist family that rules over the world economy and controls the world’s banks. It is they who received from Balfour the famous declaration in support of the reconstitution of a national home for the Jews in Palestine.

America supports bodies that encourage riots and ethnic cleansing. Unfortunately, media misinformation started to have a grievous influence on public opinion in Europe and throughout the world; therefore, untruth is sometimes victorious. The Western public prefers to hear what is going on in Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya. It was hoped that Western journalists were reputable while working for major mass media, free from fabrication, and especially those before NATO campaigns, which sincerely states its intentions about attacks on Syria, Iran, Venezuela

or maybe Algeria.

In 2007, American general Wesley Clark announced in an interview that the Pentagon was determined to control over seven countries in the five years following 2001: Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Iran. Just as a reminder, it was General Clark who cruelly bombed Yugoslavia in 1999. When he speaks about conspiracy he knows what he is talking about. After 9/11, new American policy has crystallized as a project for a new American era; its aim is to dominate the Middle East and the Islamic world.

In fact, this tendency is a part of a re-colonization of the world, especially now with the American economy in crisis, as well as the international capitalist system which is a parasite living at the expense of Southern countries. When America felt the burden of the economic crisis it started to use the military card to gain access to oil, water and currency supplies; in the meantime it seeks to undermine every country that tends toward development and democracy. When America realized that it is no longer able to lead wars on its own behalf, it devised an idea of privatization learned from theorists like Brzezinski or from the lessons of the Bush era. In particular, it never won the day in war on the ground. The idea of privatization of wars is based on providing assistance to the rebels — the majority of whom are Arab mercenaries or foreign narcotics traffickers. Washington promised some countries that it would train the mercenaries — and we have to mention here that there is a close cooperation between Israeli forces and those bodies that recruit mercenaries throughout the world. Perhaps they paid these countries to lead wars for Israel’s and the West’s benefit.

But France and Great Britain play their own game for “future benefits,” according to the words of Alain Juppé about the colonial movement that we remember from the Berlin Conference of 1884.

Following this, these countries thought they had everything in the world, acting to prevent other countries from playing a financier role, in order to smooth the way for multinational companies and the Rothschilds. The U.S. and Europe take resources for trivial prices to prevent other countries from developing, and bring action against every country that opposes Western politics and the Zionists. NATO’s campaign is focused on media spin to realize these goals; there are many sources proving that plenty of pictures were fabricated to help lead the wars and strikes broadcast by Al-Jazeera, taking the advantage of victims.

Journalist Michel Collon, who witnessed the events in Libya, said that the aim is not to defend civilians but to steal oil and money. He mentioned that Western intelligence agencies were there before the resolution in 1973, so Western terrorism has contributed to the country’s partition by financing organizations of armed opposition that were committing acts of destruction. The pretext changed from the so-called civilizing mission into a humanitarian mission when a Chinese report stated that the U.S. is the biggest violator of human rights both inside and outside its borders.

*Translator’s Note: While the transliteration of this publication’s name is correct, no publication by that name could be located independent of this piece.