[W]hy should those laying the wires be permitted to decide what flows through the wires?
Once more, Trump proves to be a president guided by a blind defense of business interests, even at the expense of most citizens.
The FCC’s position fell firmly in favor of net neutrality in the USA, announcing a series of rules surrounding operators’ activities, which in future will prevent them from giving priority to certain content providers by making them pay more for better-quality access.
<i>Is it necessary to guarantee free and open access to the Internet? The debate over net neutrality has been all the rage in the United States for a decade, and this Thursday, the American telecoms regulator intends to, once and for all, make this rule a common right.</i>
Net neutrality means that a service does [Read more]
Today, at the last hour, the body that regulates U.S. telecommunications decided on net neutrality.
The proposals of the president, Tom Wheeler, were approved. They ensure the impossibility of bandwidth providers blocking or slowing web traffic alleging reasons tied to the payment of additional sums. The same [Read more]
The Federal Communications Commission has arranged a very important event for next February 26th. This independent U.S. government agency, which is directed by five commissioners appointed by the president of the United States and confirmed by the U.S. Senate, will hold a net neutrality vote on February 26th. This new [Read more]
<i>The U.S. president is urging the Federal Communications Commission to reaffirm "net neutrality." The proposal is to treat Internet network suppliers the same as electrical, water or gas suppliers, and to offer these services to everyone in the same way.</i>
It was President Obama who addressed the issue directly [Read more]
The U.S. debates Obama's proposal for preventing a two-speed Internet.