Jordan Times, Jordan
President Carter's Book 'Peace, Not Apartheid' is Well-Named

"Continuing to ignore the humiliation, indignities and racism against Palestinians has never served our national interests. Neither has it served Israeli interests."

By Sherri Muzher*

December 3, 2006

Jordan - Jordan Times - Home Page (English)    



RealVideoPalestine: Peace, Not Apartheid


—BBC NEWS VIDEO: Exiled Palestinian leader
of Hamas demands new state within six months,
or warns of new infitada, Nov. 26, 00:02:02
RealVideo

South Africa's Bishop Desmond Tutu: Israel practices apartheid.





South African statesman Nelson Mandela: Agrees
that Palestinians are victims of apartheid.


'Three Arab Towers Burning: Iraq, Palestine, and Lebanon.'

[Alquds Alarabi, U.K.].



---------------------------------------------------------------------

Palestine: Peace, Not Apartheid is the title of a new book by former President Jimmy Carter. According to this statesman who oversaw the first Middle East peace agreement between Egypt and Israel, the title was meant to provoke a much-needed discussion which rarely ever transpires in U.S. politics and media.

Not surprisingly, before it was even released some American politicians took issue with the book's title, including a cherished friend of the Arab-American community, Michigan Congressman John Conyers. He said that the use of the word "Apartheid" in the title "doesn't serve the cause of peace - and the use of it, against the Jewish people in particular, who have been victims of the worst kind of discrimination, discrimination resulting in death, is offensive and wrong."

Conyers went as far as to call Carter "to express my concerns about the title of the book, and to request that the title be changed. President Carter does not build upon his career as a proponent of peace in the Middle East with this comparison and I hope he and his publisher will reconsider this decision."

Perhaps he felt that South Africans who lived under a brutal apartheid regime would be offended. Yet interestingly, South Africa's Bishop Desmond Tutu and others have referred to the Israeli occupation of Palestinian Christians and Muslims as "Israeli apartheid."

How are the two situations similar? Well, in a 2002 speech in the United States, Tutu said he saw "the humiliation of the Palestinians at checkpoints and roadblocks, suffering like us when young white police officers prevented us from moving about."

Back in 1999, South African statesman Nelson Mandela told the Palestinian Assembly: "The histories of our two peoples correspond in such painful and poignant ways that I intensely feel myself at home amongst my compatriots."

South African author Breyten Breytenbach, who spent nine years in prison for resisting apartheid, wrote in 2002: "I recently visited the occupied territories for the first time. And yes, I'm afraid they can reasonably be described as resembling Bantustans, reminiscent of the ghettoes and controlled camps of misery one knew in South Africa."

Consider more examples: more water is given to Jewish citizens than to Palestinians; non-Jewish Israelis cannot buy or lease land in Israel; Israel's policies have involved planning regulations prohibiting Palestinian building on 70 percent of the West Bank and 80 percent of East Jerusalem. While restricting Palestinian development, Israel builds housing for its people in the occupied territories; imprisonment without charge is commonplace for Palestinians, whereas this would be forbidden for Jews; there are Jewish-only highways that cut through the West Bank.

A few years ago, the Israeli government was shown to have a 70:30 policy in the City of Jerusalem, to maintain a 70 percent Jewish population over 29 percent Muslim and 1 percent Christian minorities. This has been accomplished through house demolitions, denial of building permits, ID card confiscations and residency revocations.

This year also saw many Palestinian-Americans denied by Israel entry into the occupied territories to visit families or attend weddings and/or funerals. And then there's the ugly concrete wall, built far into Palestinian territory under the guise of security and ruled illegal by the International Court of Justice in 2004. Laypeople who've seen it nickname it the Apartheid Wall or the Landgrab Wall.

Nobody expects instant miracles to come from Carter's book, but hopefully, it will spark the sort of robust discussion that even Israeli society and media already engage in - discussions that many are afraid to raise in our own country for fear of being labeled "anti-Semitic."

The reality is that the Palestinian-Israeli conflict must be resolved if we ever hope to see stability in the Middle East. Continuing to ignore the humiliation, indignities and racism against Palestinians has never served our national interests. Neither has it served Israeli interests.

It was Henry Katzew, a former South African journalist now living in Israel, who once stated in South Africa: a Country Without Friends: "What is the difference between the way in which the Jewish people struggle to remain what they are in the midst of a non-Jewish population, and the way the Afrikaners try to stay what they are?"

There is no difference. That's why former president Carter and revered South African figures are willing to call a spade a spade.

*The Palestinian-American writer, J.D. with emphasis in international law, is director of Michigan Media Watch. She contributed this article to The Jordan Times.


VIDEO FROM LEBANON: MUFTI CRITICIZES

ATTACK ON ISRAEL, SAYS IT'S NO VICTORY

WindowsVideoAl-Arabiya TV, Lebanon: Excerpts excerpts from an interview with the Mufti of Mt. Lebanon, Muhammad Al-Jozo, Oct. 31, 00:03:33, MEMRI

"Victory means either the liberation of occupied land or the occupation of enemy land. This did not happen. We defended our land with courage and steadfastness. True, the entire Lebanese people was steadfast in the face of the Israeli attack, but to say this was a divine victory is to blow it out of proportion."


Mufti of Mount Lebanon, Muhammad Al-Jozo