Your Most Trusted Source of Foreign
News and Views About the United States
|
By Pierre Marcelle
September 30, 2005
Liberation
- Original Article (French)
Upon hearing the verdict imposed Tuesday on that symbol of torture, Lynndie England, to three years in prison, one longed to spontaneously whisper into the ears of magistrates at her Fort Hood court martial: you must not have seen what happened at Abu Ghraib. But this would have been to overlook the fact that there is nothing more blind than one that doesn’t wish to see, and that if eight soldiers like England are to be condemned for various "breaches of honor," it is clear that holding senior officers accountable for the aforesaid "honor" of the military (what a beautiful oxymoron! ...) was never intended.
At the beginning of 2004, when those extraordinarily images of England humiliating Iraqi prisoners were discovered, one wondered what there was about the torturers that could have brought about, consciously or unconsciously, this culture of making war (or of obeying such orders). Eighteen months later, it has all been settled. Quite the opposite of the popular consensus, a few black sheep and scapegoats have been identified, “depraved” ordinary soldiers like England, who will have to face the music for their commanders.
The organization Human Rights Watch released
a report on Monday regarding the torture practiced by the [U.S. Army] 82nd
Airborne Division in 2003 and 2004. So it seems that the torturers have
since spread far and wide.
On the Internet, and this was recounted
on Thursday morning by Marc Kravetz in the France Culture [section]: a
site which, for $10, invites you to discover the naked charms of the soldiers.
Free access to the familiar GIs, all clearly identified, in uniform and
on location. But the uniform is enough. The horrors of war have been spontaneously
replaced. The escalating digitized barbarity has taken its course. It has
firmly established that there is, from now on, in