We Tried to Warn Cheney About Iraq, But 'He Wouldn't Even Listen' ...

April 14, 2006

EDITORIAL

Saudi Arabia - The Saudi - Home Page (English)    


Vice President Dick Cheney: Ignored Saudi Warnings
of Disaster in Event of Iraq Invasion. (above).


—BBC NEWS VIDEO: As Iraqis are Killed In
Droves, Leaders Argue Whether There is
Actually a Civil War, Apr. 9, 00:01:44RealVideo

RealVideo[LATEST NEWS PHOTOS: Iraq].

President Bush Meets Prince Saud Al-Faisal on Sept. 20,
2001, Just After the Attack on the United States. (below).


------------------------------------------------------------------

BBC World Affairs Editor John Simpson recently recalled an interview he conducted some three years ago with Saudi Arabian Foreign Minister Prince Saud Al-Faisal, shortly before the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq. At the time, Prince Saud predicted the myriad disasters he believed would follow such an invasion: U.S. and British troops would be bogged down in Iraq for years; there would be civil war between Sunnis and Shiites.

"And what do the Americans say when you tell them this," Simpson asked him. "They don't even listen," Prince Saud said. When Simpson asked Prince Saud why he thought the U.S. was so determined to invade Iraq, he said he had put the same question to Vice-President Dick Cheney who had replied: "Because it's doable."

Prince Saud was not alone in predicting the likely consequences of an invasion of Iraq. American and British diplomats specializing in the Arab world issued their own warnings and were duly chastised.

Blair described Britain's diplomatic "Arabists" as misguided. When governments ignore their own regional experts, this is surely a sign of intellectual arrogance. When combined with ignorance, this is a lethal combination. This is what has led to the current situation in Iraq, which many now characterize as being in the grip of civil war.

But as Simpson points out, this has been an incremental process since the invasion took place, brought about by a continuing indifference to the political realities of Iraq and the region. American outrage over the events of 9/11 was understandable, but toppling Saddam Hussein only made sense if his regime had been actively involved in its execution. Saddam's links to al-Qaeda were talked up as was the possibility that he might supply terrorists with WMDs. The world now knows that the intelligence on this was either wrong or deliberately misleading.

As Simpson points out, the trouble is that undoing the kind of damage Prince Saud foresaw is proving very difficult indeed.

Place predictions about the possible consequences of an American attack on Iran on a postcard, please!


VIDEO FROM IRAN: 'IRAQI SHIITES MORE LOYAL TO IRAN THAN IRAQ'

WindowsVideoAl-Arabiya TV, Dubai: Excerpts from an interview with Egyptian President Husni Mubarak, Apr. 8, 00:04:58, Via MEMRI

"The Shiites are always loyal to Iran. Most of them are loyal to Iran and not to the countries in which they live ..."


Egyptian President Husni Mubarak