The Nation,
Pakistan
America's Chronic Betrayal of its Birthright and Ideals
By Roedad Khan*
July 15, 2006
Pakistan - The Nation - Home Page (English)
The signing of the Declaration of Independence at the
Pennsylvania State House, July 4, 1776. (above).
[
Founding Fathers of the United States]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On July 4, 1776, the Congress at Philadelphia adopted the historic
Declaration of Independence . Drafted mainly by [Thomas] Jefferson , it was the expression of the
"American mind." The time to separate from the mother country had
arrived. The umbilical cord had to be cut. The die was cast.
When America engaged in the struggle of a people escaping from
another people's yoke to create a new nation, the most just of all struggles,
outstanding men came forward to lead. Three Americans: George Washington , John Adams and Thomas Jefferson, conservative members of the colonial elite turned revolutionaries, set the
world ablaze and changed the course of history. More than any others, these
three men helped end British rule. They transformed His Majesty's American
colonies into a sovereign, independent nation.
The preamble of the Declaration asserts that under certain
circumstances, revolution is justified. Governments must rest upon "the
consent of the governed," for they are set up to protect certain
inalienable rights - "The rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness."
It was a revolutionary document in the sense that it justified a revolution
which had already begun.
George Washington; John Adams; and Thomas Jefferson: They risked
it all for a dream that has changed the world and given hope to billions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Years after the colonies had won their independence, John Adams
noted that "The Revolution was affected before the war commenced. The
Revolution was in the minds and hearts of the people." Before the first
shot was fired at Lexington, Americans' loyalty to the crown had been
undermined by years of struggle and agitation.
"All men are created equal," the Declaration asserts,
but neither Jefferson nor the others were thinking of people who had no
property or chattel – in other words, slaves. Neither were they thinking of
women. It took America - the greatest democracy in the world - 86 years to
abolish slavery, 144 years to enfranchise women and 189 years to assure the vote
to black people!
Frederick Douglass:
Ex-slave, American Hero
[Frederick Douglas]
-----------------------------------
In an Independence Day speech in 1852, black orator Frederick
Douglass would ask, "What to the Slave is the
Fourth of July? ," and
would answer by saying, "Your high independence only reveals the
immeasurable distance between us. ... You may rejoice, I must mourn." Of the
2.5 million colonists at the time of Independence, African-Americans accounted
for 20 percent, rising in Virginia to as much as 40 percent. Jefferson's
attempt to write-into the Declaration a paragraph critical of slavery was
struck down by Congress!
Hawaii Queen Liliuokalani,
America's first coup victim.
[Queen Liliuokalani]
-----------------------------
America, for all of its nascent idealism, began as an instance of
brutal European imperialism, with the extermination of indigenous peoples and
the enslavement of Africans. The invasion of Iraq was, therefore, not an
isolated episode. It was the culmination of a 110-year period during which
Americans overthrew 14 governments for various ideological, political and
economic reasons. The first foreign leader to be overthrown (January 1893) was
Queen Liliuokalani of Hawaii .
In Puerto Rico, Americans crushed the elected government of Louis
Munoz Rivera in 1898, after he had held power for just 8 days.
In the Philippines, the Americans fought poorly-armed Filipino rebels
in a war of resistance that lasted for three and half years. More than 4,000
Americans and 35,000 Filipinos were killed .
President Jose Santos Zelaya was the most formidable leader in Nicaraguan
history. His attempts to regulate the American mining companies and his
insistence on seeking loans from European rather then American banks, led the
United States to overthrow him in 1909.
In 1911, Miguel Dávila of Honduras was overthrown in an operation staged jointly by the United
States Navy and a band of rebels led by the American mercenary Lee Christmas.
[Editor's Note: In 1911, U.S. troops landed in Honduras in support
of former president Manuel Bonilla against the legitimate regime of Miguel
Dávila, whose liberalism was opposed by Washington. Bonilla's revolt was financed
by American banana tycoon Sam Zemurray and led by the American mercenary, Lee
Christmas, who became Commander-in-Chief of the Honduran Army].
Mohammed Mossadegh, Toppled
in a CIA-Engineered Coup in 1953.
His Crime: Nationalizing Iran's Oil.
[Mohammed Mossadegh]
----------------------------------------
The CIA staged its first coup in Iran, when Prime Minister
Mohammad Mossadegh nationalized
his country's oil industry. Mobs paid by the CIA rampaged through Tehran in the
summer of 1953. Mossadegh surrendered. A grateful Mohammad Reza Pahlavi told Kemit Roosevelt, the CIA operator who had masterminded the coup, "I
owe my throne to God, my people, my army - and to you."
When President Ngo Dinh Diem of South Vietnam refused to promise the Americans that he wouldn't negotiate with communist-led
insurgents, he was overthrown and killed, just six weeks after meeting [Defense
Secretary Robert] McNamara and [U.S. Ambassador to South Vietnam, Henry Cabot] Lodge.
Former Chilean President Salvador
Allede: His criticism of capitalism
made him unpopular with Washington.
[Salvador Allende]
----------------------------------------------
President Salvador Allende of Chile was overthrown in an
American-sponsored coup. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger met afterward with
the country's new leader, General Augusto Pinochet . These are just a few examples of the most direct form of American
intervention - the overthrow of foreign governments. It is an apparently never-ending
process which continues to today.
Long before September 11, Secretary of State Madeline Albright
defended the use of cruise missiles against Iraq by declaring, "If we have
to use force, it is because we are America. We are the indispensable nation. We
stand tall. We see further into the future." Hubris and hypocrisy are a
deadly combination.
------------------------------------------
Muslims today who are not connected with Osama bin Laden, consider
the United States to be on a moral par with Genghis Khan, and genuinely believe
that the War on Terror is just a euphemism for stealing Iraqi oil and extending American control over the
Islamic world. Afghanistan and Iraq have ceased to be sovereign, independent nations,
and are now under American military occupation. Iran is now in the gun sight.
Nuclear Pakistan has been turned into a "rentier state," currently
engaged in a proxy war against its own people in the [Northwest Frontier
Province of] Waziristan.
For a nation that honors democracy and freedom, the United
States has a nasty habit of embracing dictators it seems to serve U.S.
interests, and is one of the least appealing traits of U.S. foreign policy.
Like his predecessors, Bush has fallen for the illusion that tyrants make good
allies. When Washington preaches democracy while tolerating the tyranny of its allies,
America looks two-faced.
Look at the Islamic world. It contains the world's greatest
concentration of un-elected monarchs, military dictators and usurpers, all
supported by America. None would survive without American help. No wonder
America has become the object of hatred in the Islamic world. We in Pakistan
have suffered four military coups, all supported by the United States of
America. The result is what we have now: A General in uniform sitting on top of
our sham democracy! If America allowed democracy to flower in Pakistan, which
it controls today, it would begin acting in accord with its own interests
rather than the interests of the United States, and American interference would
diminish. Why should America promote democracy in Pakistan or anywhere else in
the Islamic world?
Condi with General Pervez Musharraf:
America's latest 'son-of-a-bitch?
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The United States uses a variety of tactics, mostly strong-arm techniques,
to "persuade" third world countries to do its bidding, and sometimes
it defends friendly, despotic regimes against popular anger or revolt. In her
confirmation hearings, Secretary Condoleezza Rice described Iran and Zimbabwe
as "outposts of tyranny." Pakistan, she said, was a state in
transition to a moderate and democratic future! She praised General Musharraf's
dynamic leadership and enlightened moderation. Isn't it ironic that Pakistan,
which has an "elected" all powerful President in uniform who is also
the Chief of the Army Staff; which has a toothless parliament; a figurehead
Prime Minister and a compliant judiciary; which is not the bulwark of liberty
but a shameful link in the chain of despotism in the Islamic world, was not
included by Secretary Rice in the category of "outposts of despotism?"
The people of Pakistan were denied their right to elect their President in
accordance with the Constitution. The present incumbent literally appointed
himself as President of Pakistan!
The only meaning, "Freedom" can have in Pakistan right
now is "Freedom" from military rule, the bluntest effrontery to the
very idea of freedom. That is why, when I heard President Bush speak of freedom
and declare that, "all those who live in tyranny and hopelessness can know
the United States will not ignore your oppression or excuse your oppressors,"
I didn't know whether to laugh or cry. "Liberty," President Bush said
recently, "is on the march. Democracy is spreading in the Islamic world!"
But not in Pakistan.
Pakistan, which started as a modern, progressive democratic state
58 years ago, is drifting away from the democratic path and sliding into
darkness. Thanks to the United States, the engine of history is moving Pakistan
backwards. For years, America has been indifferent to democracy in Pakistan. It
supported and continues to support military dictators who topple elected
governments in Pakistan. But for this support, the political history of Pakistan
might have been different.
Independent America, it was once hoped, would become an "Sanctuary
for mankind," and offer refuge to the world's oppressed. Like a shining
beacon, America, it was hoped, would herald the "birth of a new world,"
the beginning of an epoch in which humankind across the earth could "begin
the world again." But alas, this was not to be! The American dream has
turned sour.
The new symbol of the United States? (above).
The photo that stunned a nation:
Fleeing napalm in Vietnam. (below).
------------------------------------------------------------------
Two hundred years ago, America caught the imagination of the world
because of the ideals it stood for. Today its example is tarnished with military
adventurism and conflict. Today America is symbolized not by the Statue of
Liberty, but by the naked, black hooded Iraqi man connected to wires and told
to stand on a box by his American captors. The photo of this naked,
hooded, wired, Iraqi prisoner, standing on a box after having been told he
would be electrocuted if he stepped or fell off, may well become the lasting
emblem of this cruel, unjust war, much as the photo of a naked, fleeing,
napalmed little girl became the emblem of the Vietnam war.
In the past, some envied America, some liked America, some hated
America, but almost all respected her. Very few respect America today. All fear
America. Today Muslims perceive America as the greatest threat to the World of
Islam since the 13th century. The irony is that, despite all the untold crimes
committed by successive American governments against poor, powerless, third
world countries, the American Declaration of Independence remains, even today,
an effective force and a source of inspiration for people like us, who live
under despotic rulers - hereditary monarchs or military dictators. They see in
the American fight for liberty an encouraging precedent for their own
struggles.
*Roedad Khan joined the civil service of Pakistan in 1949 and held
several important positions, including Chief Secretary of Sindh Province; Interior
Secretary; Ministry of Interior Secretary General; Federal Minister in charge
of Accountability; and Advisor on Accountability to the Prime Minister.