Venezuela's Problem With Washington is Not Just Verbal ... It is Grave
Venezuela's decision-makers of should prepare for a widening of Washington's embargo, to include not only military equipment, but also parts for oil drilling and refining as well, according to this op-ed article from Venezuela's El Tiempo newspaper. It warns that the country's already pronounced vulnerability in the face of U.S. military power would worsen dramatically with its oil industry deprived of the equipment it needs.
By William J. Rodriguez Gamboa
Translated By Carly Gatzert
February 20, 2006
Original
Article (Spanish)
Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez Will Find it Very
Difficult to Fund His Revolution If He Can't Keep His
Oil Wells Pumping, and His Refineries Operating.
For many,
the degree of political antagonism between Venezuela and the United States can
be reduced to the malfunctioning of microphones, but I personally believe the
issue is in fact much more serious.
Despite the
changes made by top U.S. State Department officials, Washington has still
developed an unmistakably systematic agenda with respect to Venezuela, encompassing
political opposition, attempts to discredit it, and attempted isolation. These actions are becoming progressively more
obvious and less susceptible to misinterpretation.
Recent
declarations by U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice to the U.S. House
Committee on International Relations that, "Venezuela is one of the greatest
challenges for the United States," serves as a clear example of Washington’s political
decision to oppose Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez. With this statement, Condoleezza makes it
quite clear that this conflict is not merely a result of malfunctioning
microphones.
I am not at
all confident that we [Venezuelans] are prepared for the implications of such a
statement; although in diplomatic terms the most serious event to occur has
been the discharge of the military attaché to the U.S. Embassy in Venezuela and
the subsequent expulsion of a Venezuelan official from our Embassy in the U.S.,
there have also been some very calculated moves that indicate extreme danger, and
which should be of great concern.
The blockade
that has been imposed on us, not just for the purchase of aircraft, but also
the purchase of necessary parts to maintain Venezuela’s fleet of F-16s, serves
as a clear signal that [the U.S.] hopes to impede the operation of the
Venezuelan Air Force.
Washington’s interventionist attitude regarding the purchase of
parts needed by the Venezuelan Army in order to maintain its tanks and artillery,
not to mention equipment required by the Marines, is systematic; if in addition
to the blockade we add a disastrous failure to maintain our equipment,
traditionally marked by the theft and corruption that has always surrounded our
Armed Forces’ business dealings, then we will better understand our current
level of defenselessness.
Is Hugo Chavez' Bolivarian Revolution About
to Run Out of Fuel ... Literally?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Without
even considering the combat power of the empire [the U.S.], which in a conventional
confrontation would undoubtedly defeat our Armed Forces within a few minutes,
it is evident that this blockade of equipment and replacement parts for artillery
pieces is not an isolated incident. On
the contrary, this is part of a plan currently in place that I believe will
soon encompass other areas.
I have it
on good authority that some North American contractors are delaying and
interrupting the delivery of equipment and replacement parts essential to our
petroleum industry. If this becomes a clear political agenda, we will have major
difficulties keeping the Venezuelan oil industry in operation.
Whoever
believes that the empire trembles with the threat of closing CITGO refineries
are very much mistaken; this would be the most foolish way to surrender them to
the gringos, by allowing them to take the refineries without even having to use
military force.
I only
hope that those who analyze this agenda as it progresses, thoroughly evaluate
the serious consequences of this political and military spectacle; I hope that they
don't face military directives forcing them to choose between the Motherland or
Death, but rather begin to evaluate deep and far-reaching tactics and strategies, openly
anticipating that this agenda is neither fleeting nor momentary.