Obama vs. Joe the Plumber

Published in L'Actualité
(Canada) on 16 October 2008
by Jean-François Lisee (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Floriane Ballige . Edited by Jessica Tesoriero.
The original text is in French. French to English translation is as follows:
“I have to go and get ready for the debate, but what just happened is good practice.” That’s what Barack Obama said on Tuesday, after he talked to Joe the Plumber, whose real name is Joe Wurzelbacher. He met him in the surroundings of Toledo, Ohio.

During the debate, which took place on Wednesday, John McCain talked to Joe the Plumber as if the latter were his favorite interlocutor, directly through the camera. Obama followed in his footsteps, and kind of promoted Joe to the most popular person of the night.

That is an excellent strategy for McCain; it enabled him to understand, after watching the talk of Obama versus Joe, that the plumber from Ohio would rather be on the Republican side. Obama indeed wants to impose a tax on incomes larger than $250,000 a year, at the same level as they used to be when Bill Clinton was president, that is to say 39%. When Bush was president, this percentage was up to 36%. Joe wants to purchase a company whose income will exceed this level. He’ll thus have to pay taxes and doesn’t really enjoy this idea at all. He’s not a Wall Street billionaire, but a hard working ordinary American. A perfect illustration of the McCain’s campaign, too - a campaign that for the most part lies, except on this matter: the candidate makes it a point of honor to try and convince Americans that Obama wants to tax all of them.

As for Joe, he had a hard job right after the debate, explaining to the media that his vote would be kept a secret; although he essentially based his arguments on McCain’s statements about taxation, and criticized Obama for an eloquence which hides, according to him, a lack of experience. To make it short, whereas instant polls widely lead one to believe that Obama was the winner of the debate, McCain had at least one supporter in the American middle classes, named Joe the Plumber.

(By the way, if you like this strange idea that one voter only could have the ability to decide an election’s final result, I advise you to watch the film Swing Vote, with Kevin Costner, released last August).

The entirety of the discussion between Obama and Joe is worth a look. You can find it there: http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/10/spread-the-weal.html

This gives us information on the president to come. Obama directly confronted Joe’s fiscal matters, right before the cameras, and he immediately understands that this conversation is going to be a tough one for him. He tries to get around the problem in the first place, pointing out that thanks to the future president Obama, Joe’s company will benefit from a tax credit on his health expenses. However, he nevertheless has to admit that the taxes Joe will have to pay are no doubt likely to increase. At last, he tries to connect and justify his political and economical perspective within the present context, saying that if his plan had been put into practice for ten years, whereas Joe’s assets were lower than $250,000 a year, the plumber would have saved on his taxes during all that time. This hypothetical argument is not so helpful, as Joe isn’t the type of man who looks back. In the meanwhile, Obama manages to find another, yet better, argument. He claims that his proposal of decreasing taxation for investors whose capitals don’t exceeed $250,000 will give Joe’s customers the possibility to pay him for his services.

As long as the talk lasts, Joe tries to get a word in edgeways and can hardly do it because Obama speaks non-stop, stringing words together just as if he wanted to convince himself of his own credibility.

The discussion between Obama and Joe the Plumber ultimately ends so: the president to come is open (he doesn’t deny that Joe will have taxes to pay), he knows how to think over and adapt to a difficult situation, but he’s so talkative that he can almost “bury” us under his words, and he’s actually not a good listener.

Oh yes, and while we’re on the subject, Obama did win the discussion. Not that much on the form rather than on the substance. McCain was as strung-up as the strings of a violin and always on the verge of counterattacking. Obama had a cool attitude. That’s what we needed.


«Je dois aller me préparer pour le débat, mais ce qui vient de se passer est un bon entraînement». C’est ce qu’a dit Barak Obama, mardi, en quittant sa discussion avec «Joe le plombier», de son vrai nom Joe Wurzelbacher. Il l’avait rencontré près de Toledo, en Ohio.

Pendant le débat de mercredi, John McCain a fait de Joe le plombier son interlocuteur préféré, s’adressant directement à lui par caméra interposée. Obama lui a emboîté le pas, faisant de Joe l’électeur le plus populaire de la soirée.

Excellente stratégie pour McCain, car il pouvait comprendre, en ayant visionné l’échange Obama vs Joe, que le plombier d’Ohio serait plutôt républicain. En effet, Obama propose de taxer les revenus supérieurs à 250 000 $ par an au niveau où ils étaient sous Bill Clinton, soit 39% plutôt que 36% sous Bush. Or Joe compte acheter une entreprise dont les revenus dépasseront ce niveau. Il sera donc touché par cette taxe et n’aime pas du tout cette idée. Il n’est pas un milliardaire de Wall Street, mais un américain ordinaire qui travaille fort. L’illustration idéale pour la campagne - pour l’essentiel mensongère, sauf sur ce point - menée par McCain pour convaincre les Américains qu’Obama veut les taxer tous.

Joe a travaillé fort après le débat, expliquant aux médias que son vote était secret, mais reprenant essentiellement les arguments de McCain sur les questions de taxation et critiquant Obama pour une éloquence qui masque, selon lui, un déficit d’expérience. Bref, alors que les sondages instantanés donnaient Obama largement gagnant dans le débat, McCain avait au moins un allié dans l’Amérique moyenne, Joe le plombier.

(Si vous aimez l’idée voulant qu’un seul électeur pourrait détenir la capacité de décider d’une élection, c’est le scénario du film Swing Vote, avec Kevin Costner, sorti en août dernier.)

Il vaut la peine de regarder l’intégralité de l’échange Obama vs Joe, on le trouve ici car il nous informe sur le probable futur président américain. Obama est directement confronté par le problème fiscal de Joe, sous l’oeil de la caméra, et comprend immédiatement que cette conversation va lui poser une difficulté. Il commence par tenter de contourner le problème en soulignant que, grâce au futur président Obama, la compagnie de Joe va bénéficier d’un crédit d’impôt sur ses dépenses de santé. Mais il admet ensuite que, oui, l’imposition de Joe va augmenter. Puis il tente de mettre sa politique économique en contexte en disant que, si son plan avait été en application depuis 10 ans, alors que Joe faisait moins que 250 000$/an, le plombier aurait fait des économies d’impôt pendant tout ce temps. Cet argument hypothétique n’étant d’aucun secours, car Joe est un homme qui regarde en avant, pas en arrière, Obama en trouve un autre, un peu meilleur. Il affirme que la baisse d’impôt qu’il propose pour ceux qui font moins de 250 000 permettra aux futurs clients de Joe de le payer pour ses services.

Pendant tout l’échange, Joe tente de placer un mot et y arrive difficillement, car Obama parle sans arrêt, enfilant ses démonstrations comme autant de bouées qu’il se lance à lui-même.

Bref, le bilan du débat Obama vs Joe le plombier est le suivant. Le futur président est franc (il ne nie pas qu’il va taxer Joe), il sait réfléchir sur ses pieds et s’adapter à une situation difficile, mais il peut nous engloutir sous ses mots et écoute finalement assez peu.

Ah, en passant, oui, Obama a gagné le débat. Pas tant sur le fond que sur la forme. McCain était tendu comme un violon et toujours à l’attaque. Obama était cool. C’est ce qu’il fallait.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Australia: Could Donald Trump’s Power Struggle with Federal Reserve Create Next Financial Crisis?

Thailand: US-China Trade Truce Didn’t Solve Rare Earths Riddle

Australia: Tech Billionaires To Reap the Rewards of Trump’s Strongarm Tax Tactics

Ireland: The Irish Times View on Trump vs the Fed: Rocky Times Ahead

Argentina: Middle East: From Nuclear Agreement to Preventive Attack, Who’s in Control?

Topics

Germany: Trump’s Opportunity in Iran

Canada: Elbows Down on the Digital Services Tax

Thailand: US-China Trade Truce Didn’t Solve Rare Earths Riddle

Ireland: The Irish Times View on Trump vs the Fed: Rocky Times Ahead

Cuba: The Middle East Is on Fire

Australia: Could Donald Trump’s Power Struggle with Federal Reserve Create Next Financial Crisis?

Taiwan: After US Bombs Iranian Nuclear Facilities, Trump’s Credibility in Doubt

Switzerland: Ukraine Is No Longer a Priority for America: Trump Leaves the Country High and Dry

Related Articles

Canada: Elbows Down on the Digital Services Tax

Canada: Trump Did What Had To Be Done

Cuba: Summit between Wars and Other Disruptions

Canada: President Trump, the G7 and Canada’s New ‘Realistic’ Foreign Policy