Obama is Getting Ready to Play Tricks on China

Published in Wen Wei Pao
(Hong Kong) on 06 Feb 2009
by Wah Ching-Mau (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Kwok Wai-Yin. Edited by Louis Standish.
Over the years, no matter gets elected president of the U.S., be it the Democrats or the Republicans, there are two major problems between China and the U.S.; Taiwan and Sino-U.S. trade. Obama seems worried about the Sino-U.S. trade at the beginning of his presidency and is quite interested in playing tricks with Beijing concerning trade protectionism. Beijing's position is to resist and stay firm.

After two important members of President Obama’s team- Treasury secretary Timothy Geithner and Defense secretary Robert Gates- expressed unfriendly messages towards China that brought up questions about the future of Sino-U.S. political relations. Everyone is worried about those new variables concerning Sino-U.S. relations now that the White House occupant has changed. Public opinion and the unfriendliness that Beijing felt led to an appropriate application of pressure on the White House so that they had to patch up their speech claiming that neither Geithner’s or Gates’ opinions represent U.S. policy. Afterwards, Chinese President Hu Jintao and President Obama talked on the phone. President Hu clarified that China is firmly opposed to trade and investment protectionism, and it will jointly promote with Washington the positive results achieved by the G-20 Finance Summit so as to ensure a stable and healthy world economic and financial development.

Sino-U.S. Trade Friction Expected to Rise

Obama's position was rather ambiguous, not saying he would promote trade protectionism or oppose it, but he said to Hu Jintao that China and the U.S. must fix the global trade imbalance together and reconcile the credit market to cope with the world economic crisis.

Obama's vague position actually implies that the U.S. may implement protectionist trade and investment policies. A trade war between China and the U.S. would be then under way. It can be anticipated that Sino-U.S. trade conflicts will arise constantly in the future, as the U.S. will find all sorts of excuses and reasons for any mischief on this issue, the core being some intervention in the RMB exchange rate to reduce the trade surplus between China and the U.S. For Obama, this is the only way to protect American industries and to create job opportunities. During the campaign and since taking office, Obama guaranteed firmly to his American voters that he will create five million jobs. To this end, he will focus on Sino-U.S. trade and the RMB exchange rate.

Concerning Taiwan, Beijing insists on three principles: first, Taiwan is a domestic issue and China does not allow foreign intervention, including the U.S.; second, China opposes the U.S. selling weapons to Taiwan; third, China disagrees that the U.S. is delivering the wrong message uncontrollably in trying to encourage "Taiwanese independence" until it risks danger in desperation. Regarding Sino-U.S. trade issues, China is opposed to protectionism and insists on their own exchange rate policy, making its own decisions on RMB exchange rate reform according to changes in its’ condition or maturity.

Beijing’s Cool Response to Obama’s China Policy

Concerning these two major issues between China and the U.S., Beijing has already made a close observation during Obama’s presidential campaign. The International Liaison Department of the CPC Central Committee sent two officials to participate in the American Democratic Party’s General Assembly to observer what kind of policies Obama would formulate towards China if elected. At the Democratic Party's General Meeting, the Beijing observers did not have any opportunities to talk with Obama, but talked with people on his foreign affairs team, as well as participate in a Democratic-sponsored forum on America’s foreign policy. Through these conversations and the forum, Beijing observers were impressed on two counts: first, Obama was concerned about the Sino-U.S. trade imbalance and leans towards implementing trade protectionism; second, Obama is satisfied with the current moderation at the Cross-Strait, encouraging the peaceful development of Cross-Strait relations and with U.S. being prudent in selling weapons continuously to Taiwan.

It seems that Obama is really concerned about Sino-U.S. trade issues and is quite interested in playing tricks on Beijing regarding trade protectionism. Beijing's position is to resist and remain firm.


這些年來,無論是何人當選美國總統,無論是民主黨還是共和黨上台,中美之間有兩個最大的問題,一是台灣問題,一是中美貿易問題。看來上台伊始的奧巴馬對中美貿易問題確乎耿耿於懷,頗有興趣在貿易保護主義方面和北京過兩招。北京的態度也有兩條,一是反對,二是不怕。
 奧巴馬總統手下的兩員大將——財政部長蓋特納、國防部長蓋茨先後對中國發表「不友善」言論後,引起中美政壇對兩國關係如何向前走的猜測,大家都擔憂白宮易主之後,中美關係是否出現新的變數。輿情的猜測和北京感到的不友善並做出了適度的「言文反擊」,給白宮造成壓力,不能不做出「修補」的言論,聲稱蓋特納和蓋茨的說法「並非美國的政策」。之後中國國家主席胡錦濤和奧巴馬總統通電話。胡主席明確表示,中國堅決反對貿易和投資保護主義,中國將與華盛頓共同推動倫敦二十國集團金融峰會取得的積極成果,促進世界經濟金融健康穩定發展。
中美貿易磨擦料會增加
 奧巴馬的態度頗為曖昧,不說要搞貿易保護主義,也不說反對貿易保護主義,他對胡錦濤說,中美兩國必須共同修正全球貿易不平衡問題,疏通信貸市場,以應對世界經濟危機。
 奧巴馬的「曖昧」態度實際上還是美國有可能推行貿易和投資保護主義。中美之間爆發貿易戰埋下伏筆。可以預期,今後一段時間,中美之間貿易磨擦必會不斷,美國方面會尋找各種借口和理由在這個問題上出招,核心問題是要干預人民幣匯率,減少中美貿易順差。在奧巴馬看來,只有這樣做才能保護美國的工業,才能為美國「創造」就業機會。而奧巴馬在競選和上台後,向他的美國選民拍胸脯保證最多的,就是他要「創造五百萬個就業機會」。為此,他必會打中美貿易的主意,必會打人民幣匯率的主意。
 這些年來,無論是何人當美國總統,無論是民主黨還是共和黨上台,中美之間有兩個最大的經常發生的問題:一是台灣問題;一是中美貿易問題。在台灣問題上,北京堅持三點原則:一是台灣問題是中國的內政,不容外國干預,包括不容美國干預;二是反對美國對台售武;三是反對美國「發放錯誤訊息」令「台獨」猖狂坐大,直至鋌而走險。在中美貿易問題上,中國反對保護主義,堅持自己的匯率政策,堅持由自己根據條件的變化和成熟決定人民幣匯率改革的步伐。
北京冷靜應對奧巴馬對華政策
 對於這兩個中美之間的重大問題,北京在奧巴馬競選總統時,就做了密切的觀察。中共中央對外聯絡部曾派出兩位官員參加美國民主黨大會,以觀察員的身份了解奧巴馬一旦當選後會制訂什麼樣的對華政策。在那次民主黨的大會上,北京的觀察員未能有機會和奧巴馬本人交談,只和奧巴馬競選團隊中「負責外交問題」的人進行交談,並參加了民主黨舉辦的一次有關美國外交政策的座談會。從這些交談和座談會上,北京觀察員得到兩點印象:一是奧巴馬關注中美貿易「不平衡」問題,有實施貿易保護主義的傾向;二是奧巴馬「滿意」海峽兩岸出現的「和緩」,「鼓勵兩岸關係和平發展」,對美國繼續出售武器予台灣持謹慎態度。
 看來上台伊始的奧巴馬對中美貿易問題確乎耿耿於懷,頗有興致在「貿易保護主義方面要和北京過兩招。北京的態度也有兩條:一是反對,二是不怕。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Australia: Donald Trump Just Won the Fight To Remake America in 3 Big Ways

Australia: Donald Trump Is Not the Only Moving Part When It Comes to Global Trade

Germany: Big Tech Wants a Say in EU Law: More Might for the Mighty

Spain: A NATO Tailor-Made for Trump

OPD 26th June 2025, edited by Michelle Bisson Proofer: See...

Topics

Canada: Canada Must Match the Tax Incentives in Trump’s ‘Big Beautiful Bill’

Germany: Big Tech Wants a Say in EU Law: More Might for the Mighty

Germany: Trump’s Disappointment Will Have No Adverse Consequences for Putin*

             

Spain: Global Aid without the US

Spain: Not a Good Time for Solidarity

India: Trump’s Tariffs Have Hit South Korea and Japan: India Has Been Wise in Charting a Cautious Path

Related Articles

Hong Kong: Foreign Media Warn US Brand Reputation Veering toward ‘Collapse’ under Trump Policy Impact

Hong Kong: The Lessons of World War II: The Real World Importance of Resisting Hegemony

Hong Kong: Can US Tariffs Targeting Hong Kong’s ‘Very Survival’ Really Choke the Life out of It?

Hong Kong: What Makes US Trade War More Dangerous than 2008 Crisis: Trump

Hong Kong: China, Japan, South Korea Pave Way for Summit Talks; Liu Teng-Chung: Responding to Trump