N. Korean Nuclear Issue Not Just Between N. Korea and U.S.

Published in Zaobao
(Singapore) on 9 May 2009
by Yong-Song Ruan (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Cheryl Tevis. Edited by Christie Chu.
After the launch of North Korea’s “satellite,” the U.S. and Japan reacted violently, demanding sanctions on North Korea. In China, with Russian mediation, the U.N. Security Council adopted a non-binding chairman's statement accusing North Korea of violating resolution 1718 in hopes that North Korea would return to a denuclearized orbit. However, North Korea reacted just as violently, threatening to withdraw from six-party talks indefinitely. North Korea then immediately reopened its nuclear facilities. Recently, North Korea again demanded an apology from the Council, threatening to carry out a nuclear weapons test. This makes China’s task of long-term mediation between North Korea and the U.S. a difficult situation.

Due to misinformation and other reasons, the majority of Chinese people (including some Institute of International Affairs scholars) believe that the issue with North Korea is simple: North Korea and China are friendly neighbors with a deep bond. North Korea is a sovereign state with the right to use nuclear energy and even develop nuclear weapons to safeguard its own security. But it’s not actually that simple.

North Korea Has Complete Strategy

North Korea believes that its satellite launch was not a missile, but missile and satellite launching technology are the same, and the world has not yet monitored the launch of North Korea’s “satellite” into space. Most kind-hearted Chinese people may not know that while China has started to nation-build, Chinese volunteers have sacrificed much for North Korea. Yet this help has not been accounted for in North Korean textbooks or museums. The way the North Koreans have disrespected the graves of Chinese volunteers in the past is also distressing.

For decades, North Korea has been manipulating the situation between China and the Soviet Union. It has been holding out for distant diplomacy, playing both sides, winning tremendous material support and maintaining its stability.

After the collapse of the Soviet Union, Russia became vulnerable. North Korea itself had an outbreak of famine for several years. Without China's assistance, it would have been impossible for the North Korean regime to continue to this day.

It should be acknowledged that North Korea had started a full-fledged secret nuclear strategy since Kim Il Sung was in power. At that time, North Korea had already taken in South Korean nuclear researchers; and, when the Soviet Union disintegrated, they also incorporated a large number of Soviet Union experts to create a substantial research team. Kim Jong-Il has taken nuclear strategy even farther by pushing tactical boundaries to the limit. He is fighting for time. This year North Korea’s launch range capability and technology is already far beyond that of three years ago. The Chinese should not turn a blind eye to this.
As an irrational power, North Korea ignores its international obligation to guard against nuclear proliferation, and instead courts countries like Pakistan and Iran. More than a decade ago, North Korea secretly cooperated with Taiwan’s Lee Teng-Hui regime to provide financial assistance for Taiwan to bury nuclear power plant waste on the west coast. As soon as there is nuclear pollution, coastal northern China will be subjected to a sea life disaster and North Korea's future generations will suffer. Only through vigorous opposition by China will this end.

Have North Korea and the United States Gone Mad?

By attempting to show off its nuclear weapons, North Korea has forced the United States to pay close attention and has rid itself of dependence on Chinese aid. However, North Korea frequently uses extreme strategies. Should the United States buy it? Can North Korea succeed in its wishful thinking?

Two successive South Korean administrations have implemented the Sunshine Policy towards North Korea. But after providing substantial assistance according to the policy, North Korea's economic reform is still at a standstill. In addition, they took South Koreans hostages (far more than the number of abducted Japanese), turned a deaf ear to the issue and had a negative attitude toward reuniting separated families of the north and south. This eventually led to South Korea’s attitude against North Korea. In the United States and Korea, leaders are chosen by voters, and Japanese leaders are also constrained by domestic public opinion—but not in North Korea.

The United States has made it clear that it is not interested in providing food or oil assistance to North Korea. It seems that the current nuclear issue is no longer the issue the United States is most concerned with.

The Country Under Greatest Nuclear Threat Is China

It is national interest, rather than loss of face, which is of paramount importance to China. Can the location of North Korea serve as a strategic buffer between China and South Korea and U.S. joint military forces? Are 21st century war strategies still applicable nowadays? Whether regarding economic interdependence or global affairs, China and the United States are closely tied together and cannot be separated. International politics can change anything, but national interests cannot be changed.

China is worried about a collapse of the North Korean regime and a consequential influx of millions of refugees to the northeast. Therefore, it consistently urges North Korea to follow China’s example in reform and opening up new paths to improve the lives of its people.

But two decades later, North Korea's ambition to develop nuclear weapons keeps growing, and its nuclear technology is becoming increasingly sophisticated. Furthermore, it has no interest in economic reform and is indifferent to the welfare of its people. As far as North Korea is concerned, since it is receiving charity and fending for itself without engaging in economic reform, maintaining the status quo is a good choice. The problem is: How long can China continue to sacrifice to this regime which has turned its back on China? And how long can this closed regime last, which doesn’t care for the lives of its people?

Theoretically, in order to strike a balance in East Asia, the United States cannot allow North Korea to possess nuclear weapons. But, on the other hand, the United States is a completely realistic country--North Korea is thousands of miles away. North Korea is not the biggest threat to the United States, or even Japan, but China.

As soon as there is a North Korean nuclear leakage or nuclear radiation, China will suffer the most. If there is civil unrest in North Korea, a mishap with a nuclear weapon, or if a terrorist acquires a nuclear weapon, China's security will be seriously threatened. Delaying the North Korean nuclear issue will give North Korea more time, while China will be the biggest loser.

China Should Prepare For a Change in the Peninsula

Right now South Korea is clamoring about North Korea’s “satellite” launch and Japan is grumbling. Is China willing to see its East Asian neighbors in a nuclear arms race?

The North Korean nuclear issue is not just an issue between the U.S. and North Korea. It is also an issue vital to China's security. China must warn North Korea: China is firmly opposed to a nuclear-armed North Korea. China's economic assistance is not unconditional or endless. China has the right to investigate local distribution of aid. Clear records must be kept of loans to trump North Korea in the future. North Korea is a sovereign independent country, and must be responsible for solving the problems of its people. Moreover, it must strictly comply with the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty or face the most severe of sanctions.

In the past, China used a large number of human and material resources in selfless assistance to Vietnam to fight against the United States. With the small stature of the Vietnamese, they could not handle 100 pound sacks of rice, so China packaged rice in 50 pound sacks. But disregarding this kindness, Vietnam still cut off ties with China and sided with the former Soviet Union. They used Chinese weapons and food to fight China. We should learn from this experience. Who can guarantee that North Korea won’t aim its missiles at China in the future? The Chinese people should not place too much hope in the present North Korean regime.

China has issued the "National Human Rights Plan of Action" and is heading toward human rights and the rule of law. Whether it is because of a lack of awareness, the friendship between the older generations, or a so-called strategic buffer, there is no need for China to be threatened by others. China must reveal its hand as soon as possible! In addition, the Chinese government needs to build up a research team for the Korean Peninsula issue so that preparations can be made for a variety of changes regarding issues that might arise.


朝鲜核问题不仅是美朝之间的问题

  朝鲜发射“卫星”后,美日作出激烈反应,强烈要求制裁朝鲜。在中国、俄罗斯的斡旋下,联合国安理会通过了一份不具备约束力的主席声明,指责朝鲜违背了1718号决议,希望朝鲜回到非核化的轨道。朝鲜立即作出激烈反应,扬言永远退出六方会谈,立即重启核设施。近日又要求安理会向朝鲜道歉,否则将进行核武器试验。这使长期在美朝之间苦口婆心做调停的中国面临极其尴尬的局面。
  由于信息不对称等方面的原因,多数中国人(包括有些国际问题研究所的学者)认为朝鲜与中国是友好邻邦,是鲜血凝成的友谊,朝鲜是主权独立的国家,有权利用核能甚至开发核武器维护自身的安全。但是,事实没有这么简单。
朝鲜有完整的战略
  朝鲜认为自己发射的是卫星不是导弹,其实发射导弹和卫星都是同样的技术,世界各国至今都未监测到朝鲜“卫星”进入了空间轨道。大多数善良的中国人可能还不了解:在中国建国初期百废待兴之际,中国人民志愿军为援助朝鲜付出了巨大牺牲,朝鲜历史教科书和历史博物馆中对此几乎不甚着墨,过去对中国志愿军坟墓做出的无礼行为更是令人痛心。

  数十年来朝鲜一直在中国和苏联之间玩弄等距离外交、两面讨好,赢得两国巨大的物质支持,维持了朝鲜的稳定。
  苏联崩溃后,俄罗斯一度自顾不暇,朝鲜连年爆发饥荒,没有中国的援助,朝鲜政权不可能延续至今。
  应当承认:自金日成开始朝鲜就有完整的秘密核战略。当年朝鲜就曾吸收南韩核研究人员,苏联解体后又收编了一大批苏联专家,充实研究队伍。金正日更是“青出于蓝胜于蓝”,将边缘战术发挥到极致。金正日争取了时间,今年朝鲜的发射距离和技术已经远远超过三年前。中国对此不应视而不见。
  作为一个不理性的政权,朝鲜无视防止核扩散的国际义务,还与巴基斯坦、伊朗等国暗送秋波。十多年前,朝鲜曾经与台湾李登辉政权暗中勾搭,以台湾提供经济援助为条件,在西海岸掩埋台湾发电厂的核废料。一旦发生核污染,中国华北沿海将遭受池鱼之灾,朝鲜的子孙后代也将深受其害。后因中国严厉反对才作罢。
朝鲜和美国葫芦里卖的是什么药?
  朝鲜企图通过炫耀核武迫使美国重视朝鲜,摆脱对中国援助的依赖。但是,频繁使用边缘战略,美国是否买账?朝鲜的如意算盘能否得逞呢?
  韩国两届政权连续推行阳光政策,向北方提供大量援助后,朝鲜的经济改革依旧原地踏步,对南韩被绑架人质(人数远远超过被绑架的日本人)问题置若罔闻,对南北离散家属会面态度消极,最终导致南韩“厌北”民意高涨。美国、韩国的领导人地位都是来自人民的选票,日本领导人也受国内民意制约。
  美国已经表明它没有意愿、也没有兴趣向朝鲜提供粮食和石油援助,朝鲜核问题当下似乎已不是美国最关心的问题了。
受朝鲜核威胁最大的是中国
  丢面子是小事,国家利益才是头等大事。朝鲜的位置能否充当中国和南韩美军之间的战略缓冲,21世纪战争形态是否依然适用旧思维?中美之间无论是经济依存,还是国际事务,已经是你中有我,我中有你,不可分割了。国际政治什么都可能改变,只有利益无法改变。邱震海先生的大作对此已经阐述得非常明白,笔者不再赘述。
  中国担心朝鲜政权一旦崩溃,将给中国东北带来数百万难民的冲击。因此,中国一直奉劝并引导朝鲜效仿中国走改革开放的道路,改善本国人民的生活。
  可是二十年过去了,朝鲜发展核武的雄心越来越大,核技术日趋先进,对经济改革毫无兴趣,对人民的死活漠不关心。对朝鲜来说,既然不搞经济改革,也有人免费送粮上门,还对自己执礼甚恭,维持现状不是很好的选择吗?问题是中国对这个翻脸如翻书的政权准备“奉献”到何时?一个不顾人民死活的封闭政权到底能维持多久?
  理论上看,为了东亚的平衡,美国不可能允许朝鲜拥有核武。但是,另一方面,美国又是一个彻底的现实主义国家。朝鲜离美国十万八千里,受到朝鲜威胁最大的并不是美国,甚至也不是日本,而是中国。
一旦朝鲜出现核泄漏、核辐射,中国受害最大。一旦朝鲜发生内乱、核武出现不测,一旦东突等恐怖分子掌握核武器,中国的安全将受到严重威胁。拖延朝鲜核问题,使朝鲜赢得了时间,最大的输家是中国。
中国应为半岛变局作准备
  现在韩国也在叫嚷要发射“卫星”,日本也在嘟囔不休,中国愿意看到东亚邻居的核竞赛吗?
  朝鲜核问题绝对不仅仅是美朝之间的问题,也是攸关中国安全的大问题。中国必须义正词严告诫朝鲜:中国坚决反对朝鲜核武装,中国的经济援助不是无条件和无休止的,中国有权对援助物资的分配情况进行实地调查,对于国家之间的借款必须保留明确记录清单,以备日后作为王牌使用。朝鲜作为一个主权独立的国家,应该负责解决本国人民的温饱问题,并严格遵守核不扩散条约。否则将面临最严厉之制裁。
  中国过去曾经动用大量人力物力无私援助越南抗击美国。当年越南人身材矮小,一百斤包装的大米背不动,中国就下令国内单位改成50斤的小包装发送。最后越南还是恩断义绝,一面倒向前苏联,用中国支持的武器和粮食与中国作战。前事不忘,后事之师。谁能保证今后的朝鲜会不会将导弹方向对准中国?今天对于朝鲜政权,中国人不应一厢情愿。
  中国已经颁布《国家人权行动计划》,正在义无反顾的迈向人权、法治的道路,无论是基于虚无的意识形态、老一代之间的友谊,还是所谓的战略缓冲,中国没有必要被别人要挟。中国必须尽早亮出自己的底牌!此外,中国政府必须充实朝鲜半岛问题的研究队伍,为半岛可能出现的各种变局提前作准备。
  
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Mexico: The Military, Migrants and More

Australia: What US Intelligence and Leaks Tell Us about ‘Operation Midnight Hammer’

Switzerland: Ukraine Is No Longer a Priority for America: Trump Leaves the Country High and Dry

Germany: Trump’s Opportunity in Iran

Thailand: US-China Trade Truce Didn’t Solve Rare Earths Riddle

Topics

Germany: Trump’s Opportunity in Iran

Canada: Elbows Down on the Digital Services Tax

Thailand: US-China Trade Truce Didn’t Solve Rare Earths Riddle

Ireland: The Irish Times View on Trump vs the Fed: Rocky Times Ahead

Cuba: The Middle East Is on Fire

Australia: Could Donald Trump’s Power Struggle with Federal Reserve Create Next Financial Crisis?

Taiwan: After US Bombs Iranian Nuclear Facilities, Trump’s Credibility in Doubt

Switzerland: Ukraine Is No Longer a Priority for America: Trump Leaves the Country High and Dry

Related Articles

Singapore: Trump’s America Brings More Chaos, but Not Necessarily More Danger

Singapore: No Ukraine Cease-fire – Putin Has Called Trump’s Bluff

Singapore: Lessons from the Trump-Zelenskyy Meltdown – for Friends and Foes

Singapore: In Trump and Musk’s America, Echoes of China’s Past Emerge