U.S. Denounces ProposedSettlement in East Jerusalem

Published in Le Figaro
(France) on 20 July 2009
by Mark Henry (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Patricia Simoni. Edited by .
A construction program, funded by a Jewish American businessman, is the source of new difficulties between the United States and the Jewish state.

On Sunday, Jerusalem found itself at the center of a strange controversy. The U.S. is challenging Israel, regarding the upcoming construction of a building in the Arab part of Jerusalem, funded by one of their own nationals, Irwin Moskowitz. The businessman, who made his fortune in gambling in Miami, for years has supported a host of organizations and Israeli ultra-nationalist groups, whose goal is the settlement of Arab neighborhoods in Jerusalem, where more 200,000 Palestinians live.

The situation is escalating. Last week, Michael Oren, Iraeli ambassador, was summoned to the State Department in Washington, where he had to explain the recent green light given to the construction of a score of housing units and parking lots in Sheikh Jarrah, the upscale neighborhood of East Jerusalem, on the site of a hotel [historic Shepherd's Hotel], acquired by Irwin Moskowitz 24 years ago. By thus expressing their displeasure, Americans have made it understood that this type of initiative is not appreciated, at a time when Barack Obama is calling for a freeze on Israeli settlement of territories conquered by Israel during the war of June 1967. At this point, the dispute has focused on the West Bank. Barack Obama’s administration seems determined to extend it to East Jerusalem.

Palestinian protests

The international community has, in fact, never acknowledged Israel's annexation of this part of the city, which Palestinians want as the capital of their future state. Its isolation has not preventing a dozen new neighborhoods from springing up, where more than 200,000 Israelis live. Netanyahu hoped Americans would close their eyes. He was caught by surprise, which led him to raise the rhetoric, “Israeli sovereignty over Jerusalem is undisputed, and Jews have the right to live anywhere in the city," he declared, adding: "I cannot imagine what would happen if the Jews were forbidden to settle in parts of New York, London, Paris or Rome."

Most of the centrist opposition supports his position. Only a few isolated voices on the left went against the flow, like Labor member, Ofir Pines, who said "Moskowitz has been trying for years to stir things up in Jerusalem."

Palestinians have an opportunity to denounce the government of Benjamin Netanyahu. "It is time”, stresses Saeb Erakat, negotiator for President Mahmoud Abbas, “for the Israeli Prime Minister to understand that there is a new U.S. administration in Washington, and that no peace is possible if the eastern part of Jerusalem does not become the capital of our nation. "


Un programme immobilier financé par un homme d'affaires juif américain est à l'origine d'une nouvelle brouille entre les États-Unis et l'État hébreu.

Jérusalem s'est retrouvé dimanche au centre d'une étrange polémique. Les États-Unis ont protesté auprès d'Israël contre la prochaine construction d'un immeuble dans la partie arabe de Jérusalem, financée par l'un de leurs ressortissants, Irwin Moskowitz. Cet homme d'affaires, qui a fait fortune dans les jeux à Miami, soutient depuis des années une kyrielle d'organisations et de groupes ultranationalistes israéliens qui se sont fixés comme objectif de s'installer dans des quartiers arabes de Jérusalem, où vivent plus de 200 000 Palestiniens.
L'affaire est remontée très haut. La semaine dernière, Michael Oren, l'ambassadeur d'Israël, a eu droit à une convocation au département d'État, à Washington, où il a dû s'expliquer sur le feu vert donné récemment à la construction d'une vingtaine de logements et de parkings à Cheikh Jarrah, le quartier huppé de Jérusalem-Est, à la place d'un hôtel qu'Irwin Moskowitz a acquis il y a vingt-quatre ans. En manifestant ainsi leur mauvaise humeur, les Américains ont fait comprendre que ce genre d'initiative tombait très mal, au moment où Barack Obama prône un gel de la colonisation israélienne dans tous les territoires conquis par l'État hébreu durant la guerre de juin 1967. Jusqu'à présent, la dispute portait surtout sur la Cisjordanie. L'Administration de Barack Obama semble décidée à l'étendre à Jérusalem-Est.

Protestations palestiniennes

La communauté internationale n'a, en effet, jamais reconnu l'annexion par Israël de cette partie de la ville, dont les Palestiniens veulent faire la capitale de leur futur État. Cet isolement n'a pas empêché une douzaine de nouveaux quartiers, où vivent plus de 200 000 Israéliens, de sortir de terre. Benyamin Nétanyahou espérait que les Américains fermeraient les yeux. Il a été pris par surprise, ce qui l'a poussé à hausser le ton. «La souveraineté d'Israël sur Jérusalem n'est pas contestable, et les Juifs ont le droit de vivre partout dans la ville», a- t-il proclamé, et d'ajouter : «Je n'ose imaginer ce qui se passerait si on interdisait aux Juifs de s'installer dans certains quartiers de New York, Londres, Paris ou Rome.»

La majeure partie de l'opposition centriste s'est ralliée à sa position. Seules quelques voix isolées, à gauche, ont été à contre-courant, tel le député travailliste Ofir Pines, pour qui «Moskowitz tente depuis des années d'enflammer les esprits à Jérusalem».

Les Palestiniens ont saisi l'occasion pour dénoncer le gouvernement de Benyamin Nétanyahou. «Il serait temps, souligne Saëb Erakat, un proche du président Mahmoud Abbas, que le premier ministre israélien comprenne qu'il y a une nouvelle administration américaine à Washington, et qu'aucune paix n'est envisageable si la partie orientale de Jérusalem ne devient pas la capitale de notre État. »

This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Pakistan: After Me, the Deluge

Austria: Would-Be King Trump Doesn’t Have His House in Order

Germany: Can Donald Trump Be Convinced To Remain Engaged in Europe?

Japan: Reckless Government Usage of Military To Suppress Protests

India: US, Israel and the Age of Moral Paralysis

Topics

Taiwan: After US Bombs Iranian Nuclear Facilities, Trump’s Credibility in Doubt

Switzerland: Ukraine Is No Longer a Priority for America: Trump Leaves the Country High and Dry

Poland: Calm in Iran Doesn’t Mean Peace Yet

China: Trump’s ‘Opportunism First’ — Attacking Iran Opens Pandora’s Box

Australia: What US Intelligence and Leaks Tell Us about ‘Operation Midnight Hammer’

Australia: Tech Billionaires To Reap the Rewards of Trump’s Strongarm Tax Tactics

Austria: Would-Be King Trump Doesn’t Have His House in Order

Argentina: Middle East: From Nuclear Agreement to Preventive Attack, Who’s in Control?

Related Articles

France: Donald Trump’s Dangerous Game with the Federal Reserve

France: Trump Yet To Make Progress on Ukraine

France: Tariffs: The Risk of Uncontrollable Escalation

France: Donald Trump’s Laborious Diplomatic Debut

France: Trump’s Greenland Obsession

  1. This is a battle that America and Obama can win at a stroke, without a single life being lost and within a matter of weeks or months.

    Bring in legislation to ban all bilateral trade with Israel until its government complies with international law, the UNSC and the Geneva Conventions.

    This should be no problem, just takes the will to confront AIPAC and to demonstrate to all lobby groups that there is only one government and that, currently, is headed by elected President, Barack Omama.

    300 million voters have both the power and the money to make AIPAC completely insignificant. It’s called democracy.