America’s Ambition To Destroy Afghanistan

Published in Sabili
(Indonesia) on 4 January 2010
by Chairul Akhmad (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Anastasia Soetanto. Edited by Jessica Boesl.
The United States' determination to win the war against Afghanistan is solid. As many as 30,000 additional troops have already been prepared to destroy the Taliban and Al Qaeda.

In his speech early last December, President Barack Obama announced his plan to add to the number of American military personnel in Afghanistan. His goal is to use all of the new troops in the field by the middle of 2010. “The 30,000 additional troops... will deploy in the first part of 2010 – the fastest possible pace – so that they can target the insurgency and secure key population centers,” said Obama in his speech.

This black president asked for international support, especially from America's NATO allies, in hopes that they will agree to contribute more troops. “Because this is an international effort, I've asked that our commitment be joined by contributions from our allies... Now, we must come together to end this war successfully,” said Obama firmly.

Obama equivocated; the increase of American and international troops will increase the possibility of a speedier surrender by the Afghan rebels and will enable the acceleration of troop withdrawal from Afghanistan by July 2011. “Just as we have done in Iraq, we will execute this transition responsibly, taking into account conditions on the ground,” he said.

Obama’s stubborn determination to send more troops despite the perpetually increasing number of American military victims in Afghanistan has reaped him various criticism. One of his critics is a liberal character from the Democratic Party, George McGovern. “I am astounded at the Obama administration’s decision to escalate the war in Afghanistan, the action is wrong,” said McGovern to the Washington Post.

The ex-Senator from South Dakota compared Obama to the late democratic President Lyndon Johnson, who decided to heighten the American war in Vietnam. According to McGovern, Johnson was brilliant with domestic issues, but Vietnam destroyed his dream. The war became unbearable for American citizens, which made it impossible for Johnson to obtain the necessary vote to maintain his position in office for the next 4 years.

As long as there is a good reason for the war in Afghanistan, said McGovern, America will be able to win it. “With a $12 trillion debt and a serious economic recession, this is not a time for unnecessary wars abroad. We should bring our soldiers home before any more of them are killed or wounded - and before our national debt explodes,” he said.

Allied Support

Obama’s plan has received the full support of NATO allies. In fact, NATO will soon send two critical groups of 3,000 soldiers to north of Afghanistan under a German commander. “From a military point of view, the allied headquarters in Europe thinks it necessary to send two tactical groups into this zone,” said head commander of the operation, General Karl-Hinz Lather, who was nominated by AFP.

But German Counselor Angela Merkel said the country would wait for the official London conference on Afghanistan this upcoming Jan 28 before announcing further action. German troops in Afghanistan totaled 4,300 soldiers, stationed mostly in northern Afghanistan. German troops represent the third largest international military presence in Afghanistan, currently totaling about 100,000 troops, after the U.S. and England, with 10,000 troops.

But the French are showing their support of America’s new military plan by sending 3,300 more troops to Afghanistan. This is despite the fact that last December French President Nicolas Sarkozy said he would also wait until the London conference before announcing further renewal of military support.

England, America’s number one ally, will also support the plan by sending more troops to Afghanistan. English Prime Minister Gordon Brown said he is renewing his national commitment to defeat the Taliban in Afghanistan by adding more troops. Brown has also sent more combat equipment, including a helicopter and bomb detection devices to fight against the Taliban and Al Qaeda.

Following the combat equipment will be 500 soldiers, who will join the 9,500 English troops in southern Afghanistan. "The combined effort of allied forces with the Afghan government is the way we will defeat the insurgency, the way we will stop Al Qaeda having any space to operate in Afghanistan," said Brown, as quoted by Al Jazeera.

Brown said adding troops and weapons is part of the plan to weaken the Taliban and strengthen the Afghan government. But he fails to warn his citizens that the next few months will be critical.

Veterans Against War

Not all American citizens agree with Obama’s plan of increasing the number of military personnel in Afghanistan. March Forward, an American veteran organization who has often been the voice against war and racism, asks all soldiers to refuse the order. “All foreign forces should leave Afghanistan now!” said this organization.

March Forward also invites everyone to unite with them in the fight to assure that no more troops or innocent civilians will lose their lives because of the war. "On December 1, we got a clear order from President Obama. For many more years, we will be sent to kill, to die, to be maimed and wounded, in a war where “victory” is impossible, against a people who are not our enemies."

For more than 8 years, American troops have been going home in coffins, in wheelchairs, with burnt skin, haunted by the traumas of war, March Forward asserted. “Active duty soldiers who succumb to suicide outnumber those killed in combat,” said the organization, led by Michael Prysner, a veteran from the war in Iraq in 2008.

Despite that, multiple opposition parties seem to have no influence on American troops. The ambition to win the war in Afghanistan despite the sacrifice of thousands of soldiers remains number one.

This situation invites the attention of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mike Mullen, especially since the soldiers now control about a third of the provinces in Afghanistan. “I remain deeply concerned by the growing level of collusion between the Afghan Taliban and Al Qaeda and other extremist groups taking refuge across the border in Pakistan,” he states. “The insurgency has grown more violent, more pervasive and more sophisticated,” he said.

In the beginning, as many as 1,500 more American marines have been directed to the south, near the province of Helmand, where rebellion is the strongest. This group will prepare the logistics for the 30,000 added troops who will follow them in the coming months.

Will the American and NATO allies be able to squelch the Taliban and Al Qaeda by winning the war with the number of soldiers they have? Only time will tell.


Ambisi AS Hancurkan Afghanistan
SENIN, 04 JANUARI 2010 22:40

Anak-anak Afghanistan

Tekad AS memenangkan perang Afghanistan sudah bulat. Pasukan tambahan sebanyak 30.000 personil telah disiapkan guna menghancurkan Taliban dan al-Qaidah.

Dalam pidatonya awal Desember lalu, Presiden AS Barack Obama, mengumumkan rencananya menambah jumlah personil tentara AS di Afghanistan. Targetnya, awal hingga pertengahan 2010, seluruh pasukan tambahan yang dibutuhkan telah bertempur di Afghanistan. “Sebanyak 30.000 pasukan tambahan ini akan dikerahkan pada awal 2010 sehingga mereka dapat menyasar para pemberontak dan mengamankan wilayah-wilayah padat penduduk,” kata Obama dalam pidatonya.

Presiden berkulit hitam itu meminta dukungan internasional, terutama sekutu-sekutu AS yang tergabung dalam NATO agar turut serta mengirim pasukan tambahan. "Karena ini merupakan upaya internasional, saya meminta agar komitmen ini diikuti oleh para sekutu kami. Sekarang, kita harus bersama-sama mengakhiri perang ini dengan sukses,” tegas Obama.

Obama berdalih, penambahan pasukan AS dan pasukan internasional akan memungkinkan terjadinya percepatan penyerahan tanggung jawab kepada angkatan bersenjata Afghanistan, dan memungkinkan percepatan penarikan tentara asing dari Afghanistan pada Juli 2011. “Seperti yang telah kita lakukan di Irak, kita akan melaksanakan penarikan ini secara bertanggung jawab, dengan mempertimbangkan kondisi di lapangan,” tandasnya.

Kengototan Obama mengirim pasukan tambahan di tengah meningkatnya jumlah korban militer AS di Afghanistan, menuai kecaman beragam kalangan. Salah satunya muncul dari tokoh liberal Partai Demokrat, George McGovern. "Saya sangat heran dengan keputusan pemerintahan Obama yang meningkatkan perang di Afghanistan, padahal itu salah, " kata McGovern kepada The Washington Post.

Mantan senator dari Dakota Selatan itu membandingkan Obama dengan mendiang Presiden dari Demokrat, Lyndon Johnson, yang memutuskan peningkatan perang AS di Vietnam. Menurut McGovern, Johnson memiliki catatan cemerlang dalam persoalan dalam negeri, tapi Vietnam menghancurkan impiannya. Perang itu menjadi tak tertanggungkan bagi banyak warga AS, yang membuat Johnson tak mampu mempertahankan masa jabatan untuk empat tahun berikutnya.

Sekalipun mempunyai alasan bagus untuk perang di Afganistan, kata McGovern, AS tidak sesederhana itu bisa melakukannya. "Dengan utang 12 triliun dolar (sekitar 120.000 triliun rupiah) dan resesi parah ekonomi, ini bukan waktu untuk perang yang tak perlu di luar negeri. Kita sebaiknya membawa pulang tentara kita sebelum ada lagi di antara mereka yang tewas atau terluka, dan sebelum utang negara kita meledak," tegasnya.

Dukungan Para Sekutu

Rencana Obama ini mendapatkan dukungan penuh dari sekutu-sekutunya di NATO. Bahkan NATO akan segera mengirim dua kelompok taktis sebanyak 3.000 tentara ke Afghanistan utara, di bawah komando Jerman. "Dari sudut pandang militer, markas besar sekutu di Eropa berpikir penting untuk mengirim dua kelompok taktis ke zona tersebut," kata Kepala Staf Markas Komando Operasi Sekutu, Jenderal Karl-Hinz Lather, sebagaimana dilansir AFP.

Namun Kanselir Jerman Angela Merkel mengatakan negaranya akan menunggu hingga konferensi London tentang Afghanistan yang dijadwalkan pada 28 Januari. Tentara Jerman di Afghanistan mencapai sekitar 4.300 orang. Mereka ditempatkan di Afghanistan utara, dan merupakan penyumbang terbesar ketiga pasukan internasional yang beranggotakan 100.000 tentara, setelah AS dan Inggris yang memiliki 10.000 tentara di negara itu.

Adapun Perancis berencana mengirim 3.300 tentara ke Afghanistan dan menyambut baik strategi baru AS dengan penambahan jumlah pasukan. Namun awal Desember lalu, Presiden Perancis Nicolas Sarkozy menyatakan akan menunggu hingga konferensi London untuk meninjau kembali dukungan tentaranya.

Dukunga terhadap penambahan jumlah pasukan asing di Afghanistan datang dari Inggris, sekutu utama AS. Perdana Menteri Inggris, Gordon Brown, mengatakan telah memperbarui komitmen bangsanya untuk mengalahkan Taliban di Afghanistan dengan turut serta mengirimkan pasukan tambahan. Brown juga mengirimkan lebih banyak lagi peralatan tempur, termasuk helikopter dan alat-alat pendeteksi bom pinggir jalan, guna memerangi Taliban dan al-Qaidah.

Peralatan tempur ini akan menyertai 500 personel yang akan bergabung dengan 9.500 pasukan Inggris yang ditempatkan di Afghanistan selatan. "Kombinasi gabungan pasukan sekutu dengan pemerintah Afghanistan adalah cara kita mengalahkan pemberontakan, cara kita menghentikan ruang operasi al-Qaidah di Afghanistan," kata Brown sebagaimana dikutip Aljazeera.

Brown mengatakan penambahan pasukan maupun peralatan tempur adalah bagian dari rencana untuk melemahkan Taliban dan untuk memperkuat pemerintah Afghanistan. Namun dia memungkiri jika beberapa bulan ke depan merupakan saat-saat yang kritis.

Veteran yang Menolak Perang

Tak semua warga AS setuju dengan rencana Obama yang akan menambah jumlah personel militer di Afghanistan. March Forward, sebuah lembaga veteran AS yang kerap menyuarakan penolakan perang dan aksi rasisme, menyerukan kepada semua prajurit untuk menolak perintah tersebut. "Seluruh pasukan asing harus meninggalkan Afghanistan sekarang juga!” tegas lembaga ini dalam laman daringnya.

March Forward juga mengajak segenap kalangan untuk bergabung dengan mereka dalam perjuangan untuk memastikan bahwa tidak ada lagi tentara atau penduduk sipil kehilangan nyawa dalam perang. "Pada tanggal 1 Desember, kami mendapat perintah yang jelas dari Presiden Obama. Selama bertahun-tahun lagi, kami akan dikirim untuk membunuh, untuk mati, untuk menjadi cacat dan terluka dalam sebuah perang di mana 'kemenangan' adalah mustahil, melawan orang-orang yang bukan musuh kami.”

March Forward menegaskan, selama lebih dari delapan tahun para prajurit AS pulang dalam peti mati, di kursi roda, dengan kulit terbakar dan dihantui trauma perang. “Tentara aktif yang kalah karena bunuh diri lebih banyak daripada mereka yang tewas dalam pertempuran," demikian pernyataan lembaga yang didirikan oleh Michael Prysner, seorang veteran perang Irak pada 2008 lalu.

Walau demikian, para pejabat militer AS tak terpengaruh dengan penentangan sejumlah pihak. Ambisi memenangkan pertempuran di Afghanistan walau dengan mengorbankan nyawa ribuan prajurit, tetap nomor satu. Padahal tingkat kekerasan di Afghanistan saat ini semakin memburuk seiring dengan kian sengitnya perlawanan para pejuang.

Situasi ini mengundang keprihatinan Kepala Staf Gabungan AS, Laksamana Mike Mullen. Apalagi para pejuang mengontrol sekitar sepertiga provinsi Afghanistan. "Saya tetap sangat prihatin dengan tingkat pertumbuhan kolusi antara Afghanistan Taliban dan al-Qaidah dan kelompok-kelompok ekstremis lain yang berlindung di seberang perbatasan di Pakistan," ujarnya.

Oleh sebab itu, Mullen memerintahkan pasukan yang bergerak ke Afghanistan untuk menguatkan diri guna menghadapi pertempuran dan kemungkinan jatuhnya korban. "Pemberontakan semakin keras, lebih luas, lebih canggih," katanya.

Mengawali penambahan pasukan, sebanyak 1.500 prajurit marinir AS mendarat di Afghanistan dan dikerahkan ke selatan provinsi Helmand, salah satu medan pertempuran yang paling sulit. Pasukan pembuka ini akan mempersiapkan logistik bagi puluhan ribu tentara tambahan lain –30.000 pasukan– yang segera menyusul dalam beberapa bulan mendatang.

Akankah AS dan sekutunya dapat menumpas Taliban dan al-Qaidah serta memenangkan perang, hanya dengan banyaknya prajurit yang mereka miliki? Sang waktu yang akan menjawabnya.

Sabili
Chairul Akhmad
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Ireland: The Irish Times View on Iran and Israel: a Fragile Cease-fire

Austria: Would-Be King Trump Doesn’t Have His House in Order

Australia: What US Intelligence and Leaks Tell Us about ‘Operation Midnight Hammer’

Australia: NATO Aims To Flatter, but Trump Remains Unpredictable

Topics

Taiwan: After US Bombs Iranian Nuclear Facilities, Trump’s Credibility in Doubt

Switzerland: Ukraine Is No Longer a Priority for America: Trump Leaves the Country High and Dry

Poland: Calm in Iran Doesn’t Mean Peace Yet

China: Trump’s ‘Opportunism First’ — Attacking Iran Opens Pandora’s Box

Australia: What US Intelligence and Leaks Tell Us about ‘Operation Midnight Hammer’

Australia: Tech Billionaires To Reap the Rewards of Trump’s Strongarm Tax Tactics

Austria: Would-Be King Trump Doesn’t Have His House in Order

Argentina: Middle East: From Nuclear Agreement to Preventive Attack, Who’s in Control?

Related Articles

Portugal: Kissinger: Beyond Good and Evil*

India: When Biden’s Away

U.A.E.: Why Xi and Biden’s G-20 Meeting Was a Masterclass in Deescalation

China: Long-Awaited Scene between China and the US Gives the World Relief