Obama, the Populist

Published in Ultimas Noticias
(Venezuela) on 24 January 2010
by Mariadela Linares (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Annerys Diaz. Edited by Robin Silberman.
If we were not speaking about the president of a country that has just sent 30,000 more soldiers to Afghanistan and has Haiti kidnapped with a passive invasion of more than 10,000 Marines, I would say that Obama is putting himself in the list of revolutionary leaders of the continent. The words directed to the bankers: “If those folks want a fight, it’s a fight I’m ready to have," seems more like a comment made by Chavez. One almost gets excited.

The New York Stock Exchange fell immediately after Obama said that it was necessary to limit the size of banks and that they restrict themselves instead of making big and risky investments, with foreign money, of course. The surprise announcement, the “Yankee punch,” caught many off guard.

The polls had already announced that the president has arrived at the end of his first year with a notable decrease in the high popularity levels that he had when he first arrived in Washington — and for no good reason. The Yankees, always inclined to being prima donnas, had easily bought into the hope that a black Democrat would be able to get them out of the hole that Bush put them into, which means that Obama began to fall as soon as he started.

The escalation of broken promises — from ensuring the closure of Guantanamo prison, ending the wars that his own empire started, and finally, to trying to pass an increasingly unpopular health care bill — make it no surprise that many have described his plans and approaches as “populist” and that a decline in the stock market was ensured; talk of curbing capital in the cradle of capitalism is just short of heresy. It's like lying to the devil in the house of God.

Anyway, let’s not fall for lies. Obama’s proposals must first pass through the filter of Congress before becoming law, and we know that the Democrats have just lost their precious majority in the Senate with the votes that Scott Brown scored in Massachusetts, replacing the vacancy left by Ted Kennedy. In other words, the strategy is smart: Obama will be in good standing with his people and the banks will remain as is.


Si no fuera porque estamos hablando del Presidente de un país que acaba de mandar 30 mil soldados más a Afganistán y tiene secuestrado a Haití con una invasión pasiva de más de 10 mil marines, diría que Obama se está anotando en la lista de los mandatarios revolucionarios del continente. La frase dirigida a los banqueros, "si quieren pelea, la tendrán", parece más bien una salida chavista. Casi que uno hasta se ilusiona.

La Bolsa de Nueva York se cayó

tan pronto Obama dijo que se hace necesario limitar el tamaño de los bancos y que éstos se restrinjan a lo suyo en lugar de hacer grandes y riesgosas inversiones, con plata ajena, por supuesto. El anuncio del sorpresivo "paquetazo yanqui", agarró desprevenido a más de uno.

Ya las encuestas habían anunciado que el Presidente arribó a su primer año con un notable descenso en los altos índices de popularidad con que llegó a Washington. No era para menos. Los gringos, tan inclinados siempre al vedetismo, habían comprado con mucha facilidad la esperanza de que un negro demócrata sería una carta que los podía sacar del hueco al que los había mandado Bush. Así que Obama comenzó a descender tan pronto había subido.

La escalada de promesas incumplidas, desde la que aseguraba el cierre de la cárcel de Guantánamo hasta la que hablaba del fin de las guerras que había iniciado su propio imperio, terminó por pasarle una factura de creciente impopularidad. Por eso no extraña que muchos hayan calificado de "populistas" los planteamientos que formuló y que al mercado tenían que sentarle mal: hablar de ponerle freno al capital en la cuna del capitalismo, resulta poco menos que una herejía. Es como mentar al diablo en la casa de Dios.

De todas formas, no nos caigamos a embustes. Las propuestas de Obama tienen que pasar primero por el filtro del Congreso antes de convertirse en medidas, y ya sabemos que los demócratas acaban de perder su preciosa mayoría en el Senado con los votos que el galán Scott Brown obtuvo en Massachusetts, para reemplazar la vacante dejada por Ted Kennedy. En otras palabras, la estrategia es inteligente: Obama quedará bien con su pueblo y los bancos permanecerán como están.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Taiwan: Taiwan’s Leverage in US Trade Talks

Palestine: Ceasefire Not Peace: How Netanyahu and AIPAC Outsourced Israel’s War to Trump

Canada: Canada Must Match the Tax Incentives in Trump’s ‘Big Beautiful Bill’

Topics

Canada: Canada Must Match the Tax Incentives in Trump’s ‘Big Beautiful Bill’

Germany: Big Tech Wants a Say in EU Law: More Might for the Mighty

Germany: Trump’s Disappointment Will Have No Adverse Consequences for Putin*

             

Spain: Global Aid without the US

Spain: Not a Good Time for Solidarity

India: Trump’s Tariffs Have Hit South Korea and Japan: India Has Been Wise in Charting a Cautious Path

Related Articles

Venezuela: Vietnam: An Outlet for China

Venezuela: Geopolitics and Latin America

Venezuela: Oil Sanctions: Why the US Will Lose More Than Venezuela

Germany: Donald Trump’s Constant Lawbreaking: Destruction of Seemingly Strong Democracy

Venezuela: Ukraine: Weak Countries for Sale

1 COMMENT

  1. Couple quick fact corrections:

    1)Yankee is a pre-Civil War term for a Pro-Union citizen, more specifically, someone from the northers states. Even in modern usage it does not refer to all Americans.

    2)With the election of Scott Brown, the Senate Democrats lost their Super-Majority. They still retain a 59-41 majority over the Republicans.