Thanks, Arizona

Published in El Universal
(Mexico) on 7 May 2010
by Juan Manuel Figueroa Pacheco (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Linda Chamiec-Case. Edited by Jessica Boesl.
Wednesday, March 23rd, in Washington D.C., we were watching a broadcast of the game between Mexico and Iceland that was being played in Charlotte, North Carolina. At the end of the game it occurred to me to ask, “Hey, aren’t the people afraid to go to the game? The INS is waiting for people at the exit, no?” Everyone responded that this would be impossible (even in North Carolina, a state that is not famous for its racial tolerance). What justification would the police have to station themselves outside the stadium to ask for papers? “The majority of them are dark skinned and wear the Tri (Mexican) shirt. It would make quite a scene.”

One month after this meeting, the governor of Arizona, Jan Brewer, signed S.B. 1070 into law, which, in paragraph B of the second section instructs that when — by whatever legal means — an authority or agency of a state, county, city, town or any other political subdivision considers there to be reasonable suspicion that a person is an illegally present “alien” in the United States, this agency should make a reasonable attempt, when it’s practical, to determine the migratory status of said person.

The issue is drawing the attention of the public, even on the global level.

As all explosive issues, immigration reform is not a favorite issue of politicians in D.C., and therefore, the Arizona law was done on the other side. The scandal provoked in Arizona is taking place just months before elections and will be skirted around to adopt a clear position. However, because it’s a polarizing issue, it’s difficult to say that integral reform can become a reality this year.

For some proponents of immigration reform, it’s not the best time to bring up the discussion again, as the elections will prejudice negotiations. This is logical; however, it has an impact on both sides.

Another example is John McCain, who declared himself a supporter of comprehensive reform three years ago (together with the now deceased Senator Kennedy), and today he was one of the first to declare his support for the scandalous law. Senator McCain is the senator of Arizona, and this year will have to compete in the primary elections with the ultraconservative J.D. Hayworth, author of the book “Whatever it Takes,” which demonstrates well the motives of the 1070 law.

A reverse effect has occurred in Nevada, a state with a growing Hispanic electorate represented by Senator Harry Reid, who hurried to renounce the law, and much more. He announced the possibility of passing an immigration law in the senate this same year that deals with the process of legalization. Mr. Reid is one of the most powerful men in the United States, as he is the leader of the majority in the Senate and is very close to President Obama. However, Republicans in his state may be able to snatch his position in the upcoming elections.

The renewed enthusiasm of many candidates to make comprehensive immigration reform a priority should consolidate the Hispanic electorate, and even though it’s obvious that undocumented immigrants can’t vote, the majority have dozens of relatives who can. The stance in favor or against the Arizona law, and the issue of immigration in general, will be key for the reelection of said candidates in their states.

Even though it’s far from the Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) of 1986, the expectation of a reform that looks at a means of legalization for undocumented residents will appease a good part of the Latina community and most importantly, would stop the xenophobic initiatives in the most conservative states.

More than the 11-S or the border violence, and even more than the resultant opposition to the issue, it was disdain that kept the discussion on immigration reform paralyzed in the last few years.

With the scandalous 1070 Law, Arizona recovered the issue, thus putting it at the top of the national agenda and obliging politicians to define themselves. And although it backfired, this is something to be grateful for.


El miércoles 23 de marzo en Washington DC veíamos la transmisión del partido entre México e Islandia, que se estaba jugando en Charlotte, Carolina del Norte. Y al final del partido se me ocurrió preguntar: “Oigan, ¿no le dará miedo a tanto paisano ir a los partidos de la selección? ¿Qué tal que a la salida los está esperando la migra?”, a lo que todos me respondieron que eso sería impensable (incluso en Carolina del Norte, que no tiene fama de tolerancia racial), pues con qué argumento iban a apostarse afuera del estadio los policías para pedirles sus papeles. “Ni modo que porque la mayoría son morenos y traen la camiseta del Tri. No te imaginas el escándalo que se armaría”.

Un mes después de aquella reunión, la gobernadora de Arizona, Jan Brewer, firmó la ley SB1070, que en su sección 2, párrafo B, instruye que cuando por cualquier medio legal una autoridad o agencia del estado, condado, ciudad, pueblo o cualquier otra subdivisión política en el estado, considere que existe sospecha razonable (reasonable suspicion) de que una persona es un “alien” con presencia ilegal en Estados Unidos, deberá hacerse un intento razonable (reasonable attempt), cuando sea practicable, para determinar el estatus migratorio de dicha persona.

El tema está calando en la opinión pública, inclusive a nivel mundial.

Como todos los temas explosivos, la reforma migratoria integral no es el tema favorito de los políticos en Washington DC, y por eso lo habían hecho a un lado. El escándalo provocado en Arizona los está acorralando a unos meses de las elecciones y se verán orillados a adoptar una clara posición. Sin embargo, y debido a que el tema polariza, es difícil dar por hecho que, ahora sí, la reforma integral pueda concretarse en este año.

Entre algunos promotores de la reforma migratoria existe la opinión de que no es el mejor momento para retomar la discusión, puesto que las elecciones van a contaminar las negociaciones. Esto tiene lógica, sin embargo el impacto se está dando en ambos sentidos.

Un ejemplo adverso es John McCain, quien hace tres años se declaraba partidario de una reforma integral (junto con el ahora difunto senador Kennedy), y hoy fue de los primeros en declarar su apoyo a la escandalosa ley. El señor McCain es, nada menos, senador por Arizona y este año tendrá que contender en la elección primaria con el ultra conservador J.D. Hayworth, autor del libro Whatever it takes (Lo que sea necesario), que muy bien encajaría como exposición de motivos de la ley 1070.

Un efecto inverso sucede en Nevada, estado con creciente electorado hispano y representado por el senador Harry Reid, quien se apresuró a condenar dicha ley, y fue más allá: anunció la posibilidad de pasar en el Senado este mismo año una ley migratoria que contemple el camino hacia la legalización. Mr. Reid es uno de los hombres más poderosos en Estados Unidos, por ser el líder de la mayoría en el Senado y por su cercanía al presidente Obama, sin embargo los republicanos en su estado podrían arrebatarle la senaduría en los próximos comicios.

El renovado entusiasmo de muchos candidatos para darle prioridad a una reforma migratoria integral se debe a que el electorado hispano se consolida, y aunque es obvio que los inmigrantes indocumentados no pueden votar, la mayoría tiene decenas de parientes que sí pueden. La postura a favor o en contra de la ley en Arizona, y del tema migratorio en general, será clave para la reelección de dichos candidatos en sus estados.

Aunque lejana de la Amnistía de 1986 (Inmigration Reform and Control Act, IRCA) la expectativa de una reforma que contemple un camino a la legalización de los residentes indocumentados aliviaría a buena parte de la comunidad latina, y más importante, desactivaría las iniciativas xenofóbicas en los estados más conservadores.

Más que el 11-S, o la violencia fronteriza, incluso todavía más que una resuelta oposición al tema, fue desdén lo que mantuvo paralizada cualquier discusión de reforma migratoria en los últimos años.

Con su escandalosa ley 1070, Arizona rescató del olvido el asunto, para meterlo de lleno a la agenda nacional y obligar a los actores políticos a definirse. Y aunque le salió en calidad de “tiro por la culata”, eso es algo que se le agradece.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Switzerland: Ukraine Is No Longer a Priority for America: Trump Leaves the Country High and Dry

Turkey: Europe’s Quiet Surrender

Taiwan: After US Bombs Iranian Nuclear Facilities, Trump’s Credibility in Doubt

China: Trump’s ‘Opportunism First’ — Attacking Iran Opens Pandora’s Box

Germany: Europe Bending the Knee to Trump

Topics

Turkey: Europe’s Quiet Surrender

Austria: Trump, the Bulldozer of NATO

     

Israel: In Washington, Netanyahu Must Prioritize Bringing Home Hostages before Iran

Ukraine: Why Washington Failed To End the Russian Ukrainian War

United Kingdom: Trump Is Angry with a World That Won’t Give Him Easy Deals

Nigeria: The Global Fallout of Trump’s Travel Bans

Australia: Donald Trump Just Won the Fight To Remake America in 3 Big Ways

Colombia: The Horsemen of the New Cold War

Related Articles

Cuba: Summit between Wars and Other Disruptions

Germany: LA Protests: Why Are So Many Mexican Flags Flying in the US?

Mexico: US Pushes for Submission

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Afghanistan: Defeat? Strategic Withdrawal? Maneuver?

1 COMMENT

  1. You should be thanking Arizona. If it’s true that most of the illegal aliens in Arizona are honest hard working people, Mexico should be livid that they have left and should want their citizens back.

    Mexico’s only hope of ever having a stable government is its citizens will learn their own constitution and begin to elect leaders who are more interested in serving the people of Mexico than in scamming money from the U.S.

    When I hear this criticism of a state being overrun by illegal alien criminals, whose citizens cannot leave their homes unattended by people who condone the genocide in Darfur and never criticize those murderers, I know that Arizona is on the right side of the issue.

    Best regards,
    Gail S
    http://www.backyardfence.wordpress.com