The U.S.’ Double Standard

Published in Sin Chew Daily
(Malaysia) on 22 June 2010
by Lu Xiuqin (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Ng Ai Fern . Edited by Gheanna Emelia.
With regards to the Gulf of Mexico oil spill, British Petroleum had agreed to pay $20 billion for a compensation fund to pay for economic losses incurred by the people living in the coastal area and for environmental cleanup costs. This outcome reminds one of another agreement made by the U.S. and Vietnam last week.

The U.S. and Vietnam have reached an agreement on a compensation amount due to damages by the U.S. chemical weapon Agent Orange. The U.S. is willing to pay $300 million. This is the first time both countries’ leaders and experts reach an agreement — 35 years after Vietnam War. However, to the local people, this is a very late compensation.

10 percent of Vietnam’s jungle was destroyed; millions of people were poisoned by Agent Orange. Vietnamese are suffering from cancer, genetic mutation and other diseases, and it passes on to the next generations. All they get is $300 million of compensation and this amount has yet to be approved by U.S. Congress.

According to the U.S. Ford Foundation, U.S. Congress had only approved $3 million for the victims of Agent Orange in 2007. It is a huge difference compared to $20 billion. It is obvious to note the U.S.’s double standard.

The U.S. is a victim and a culprit in these two incidents but the outcomes are completely different. Compare both incidents: the Gulf of Mexico oil spill has affected the local fishing and tourism industry which will take another 10 years to recover, whereas in South Vietnam, land cannot be cultivated due to Agent Orange. People are suffering from miscarriage, deformity and all sorts of complications.

Oil spills are terrible disasters for our environment, but Vietnamese rights, on the other hand, were forgotten with the end of the war and the ignorance of international media.

During the meeting with BP, Obama’s administration kept on emphasizing fairness and timeliness to compensate the people and businesses. But for those generations of Vietnamese living with the effects of Agent Orange, who has ever fought for their rights?


陸秀琴‧美國的雙重標準
美國墨西哥灣漏油事故賠償事宜,英國石油公司在聽證會上,同意拿出200億美元設立賠償基金,用於支付當地沿岸居民的經濟損害賠償及環境清理費用。這讓我想起美國上週與越南達成的另一項賠償協議。
美國和越南今年首次就越戰期間,美軍化武“橙劑”的遺害達成賠償金額協議,美軍願作出3億美元的賠償。這是越戰結束近35年後,雙方決策者和專家首次就賠償數字達成協議,對當地百姓來說,是遲到很久的賠償。
然而,越南有近10%的森林面積被摧毀、數百萬名平民因遭“橙劑”毒害,遭受癌症、基因變異等疾病折磨,同時還禍延後代子孫,卻只獲得區區3億美元的賠償,而有關賠償也尚未通過美國國會確認。
根據美國福特基金會介紹,2007年美國國會批准向越南“橙劑”受害者賠償的金額僅300萬美元。這跟200億美元的差距又何止是天壤之別?從這裡不難看出美國的雙重標準。
美國在兩起事件中的身份分別是受害者及加害者,但所出現結果卻截然不同。綜觀兩宗事件,墨西哥灣漏油事故重創當地捕魚及旅遊業,事故後果至少需要數十年時間才能消除;而越南南部的土壤因噴灑“橙劑”而變得不適宜耕種,當地民眾更是無可避免地出現流產、新生兒畸形、智力受損等後遺症。
漏油事故無疑是令無數人揪心的生態災難,但越南百姓的權益,卻隨著戰爭遠去,以及國際媒體的淡化下,淹沒在時代洪流中。

在與英國石油公司談判的過程中,奧巴馬政府不斷強調要“公平”、“及時”地賠償漏油事件中受損的民眾和企業,但一代又一代生活在“橙劑”殘害的越南平民,又有誰替他們爭取正義?
星洲日報/國際漫步‧作者:陸秀琴‧《星洲日報》國際新聞組組員‧2010.06.22
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Sri Lanka: Is America Moving towards the Far Right?

Canada: Trump Doesn’t Hold All the Cards on International Trade

Singapore: The US May Win Some Trade Battles in Southeast Asia but Lose the War

India: Peace Nobel for Trump: It’s Too Long a Stretch

Topics

Indonesia: Trump Needs a Copy Editor

Indonesia: Trump’s Chaos Strategy Is Hurting His Allies, Not Just His Rivals

Sri Lanka: Epstein Files, Mossad and Kompromat Diplomacy

Sri Lanka: Is America Moving towards the Far Right?

Turkey: Musk versus the Machine: Disrupting the 2-Party System

Canada: How To Avoid ICE? Follow the Rules

Canada: Trump Doesn’t Hold All the Cards on International Trade

Ireland: The Irish Times View on Trump and Ukraine: a Step in the Right Direction

Related Articles

Malaysia: A Fresh Look at the US

Malaysia: Does the Fed’s Interest Rate Cut Mean the US Has Lost and China Has Won?

Malaysia: A New Cold War in a Changing World

Malaysia: More Nations Emulating South Africa

Malaysia: Western Double Standards