Japan’s Assumption of America’s Debt Is a Good Thing for China

Published in Huanqiu
(China) on 18 October 2010
by Qiu Lin (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Michelle Deeter. Edited by Gillian Palmer.
Statistics from the U.S. Treasury Department show that, in the past year, Japan has purchased a total of $53.3 billion in Treasury bonds, an increase of 7.2 percent. Currently, Japan holds a total of $821 billion in Treasury bonds. In contrast, China’s total holdings of United States debt reduced by 5.4 percent, or $48.1 billion, in the last year. Japan has thus surpassed China and become the largest holder of American debt for the first time since August 2008.

In the past 10 years, the American government has been constantly borrowing, and the total debt has increased by 100 percent to reach $12.9 trillion. According to White House estimates, the national debt will exceed $18 trillion by 2014. America’s debt is growing ever larger, and the only recourse is to print more money to pay for the debt. Therefore, the depreciation of the American dollar is unavoidable. Furthermore, data from the Bank of America shows that the average yield on U.S. Treasury bonds has slipped from 5.21 percent during the financial crisis in 2007 down to 1.31 percent today.

Since the financial crisis began, the security of Treasury debt has been questionable. Over 60 percent of China’s $2.45 trillion in foreign exchange reserves are American assets, including United States debt, other bonds, and securities totaling $1.5 trillion. A weak American dollar means these assets will gradually shrink. Paul Krugman, a famous American economist, indicated that the predicted investment losses on United States debt will ultimately reach 20 to 30 percent. China has become ensnared in the American dollar issue. Moreover, it can neither extricate itself nor change the policies that got it there in the first place.

Actually, China has been having a fierce debate about whether it should continue to purchase American debt for a long time now. Now, many economists and the general public do not support buying United States debt. They believe that not only is the market value of United States debt decreasing, but the value of the American dollar may decrease sharply after the financial market stabilizes. If China continues to buy United States debt, then it will sustain a huge loss, which is not in the national interest.

In that case, if inflation is on the rise and the interest rate on Treasury bonds is likely to tumble, why would Japan want to do something counter to its national interest? Some analysts believe two things. First, once Japan has bought more Treasury bonds than China, and the value of the bonds fall, other assets will shrink. Second, if the value of bonds falls, that means the U.S. dollar will become weaker, which also means that the yen will become stronger compared to the U.S. dollar. This would definitely have an adverse effect on export trade between Japan and America.

Even though the yield rates on U.S. Treasury bonds are the lowest they have ever been in 40 years, Japan still believes that America may experience its own “lost decade,” an economic slump that Japan experienced in the late 1980s. For this reason, Japan’s good favor on United States debt has surpassed China yet again. They can do it. They can give a little extra effort to prop up the U.S. dollar so it does not fall too violently. They do this because a sharp decrease in the dollar would severely affect Japanese exports, and would also make it more likely that the American dollar would be used instead of the yen for currency arbitrage.

After interests rates fell in the world’s major developed economies, Japan’s already low interest rate was no longer special, and Japan lost much of its ability to attract investors. As the difference in interest rates reduced, the profits on activities that depended on this interest rate also shrank. As the interest rate drops to nearly zero in America, no one knows whether investors will use the U.S. dollar as a low rate currency instead of the yen or use the American dollar with the euro, the Australian dollar and other currencies with high interest rates.

One has to admit that holding or reducing a large amount of United States debt will undoubtedly have political and strategic significance. The logic is simple: One grain of sand will not tip a scale, but a large bag of sand will definitely tip a scale. If a country holds a small amount of United States debt, the American government will not mind, but if a country becomes the biggest or second biggest holder of United States debt, America has no choice but to pay attention and to treat that country with caution.

For this reason, whether China moves to increase or decrease the U.S. Treasury bonds it buys, any action regarding the United States debt will have political and strategic implications. These implications are sometimes overstated, but they are not entirely groundless. An analysis in the Wall Street Journal put forth the opinion that China had reduced the amount of U.S. Treasury bonds it held in order to use the American assets it already had on hand, as well as exert pressure on America and counterattack America’s aggressive trade and exchange rate policies. Even though it may not be considered pressure, it would still give a sign to America. China can hold a silent protest against America’s trade policies and its giant deficit.

We are relieved to see that Japan has bought more U.S. Treasury bonds than China because that means that it can carry a large burden for China. This is a good thing for China. When it comes to buying U.S. Treasury bonds, China should let Japan do most of the work. When looked at another way, instead of spending a lot of money purchasing U.S. Treasury bonds, China can use that money to complete projects at home. In this way it can better benefit the people. China itself is a big market, and it should not forget this fact when trying to develop its economy. China is currently trying to stimulate domestic consumption, which has a lot of potential. If one believes that domestic demand has a strong potential and the growth of domestic investment is guaranteed by appropriate policies, then one does not need to worry about a large reduction in foreign demand.


美国财政部公布的数据显示,今年以来日本已累计购买了553亿美元美国国债,增持幅度达7.2%,日本目前持有的美国国债总额已达8210亿美元。而今年以来中国累计减持美国国债481亿美元,减持幅度达5.4%。由此,日本超过中国成为美国国债的最大持有国,为2008年8月以来的首次。


  十年来,美国政府不断举债,债务总额增加了一倍以上,达12.9万亿美元。据美国官方预计,债务总额将在2014年超过18万亿美元。由于美国的债务越滚越大,债台高筑,只能用发行更多的美元来偿还,美元贬值不可避免。而美国银行的数据显示,目前美国国债的平均收益率也已经从2007年中金融危机爆发时的5.21%下降到目前的1.31%。


  自金融危机爆发后,美国国债的安全性频遭质疑。由于中国2.45万多亿国家外汇储备中的60%以上,购买了美国资产——美国国债及其他债券、证券,总额约为1.5万亿美元。美元的持续贬值意味着这些资产会逐渐缩水。美国著名经济学家克鲁格曼指出,在美元持续贬值中,中国购买的美国国债预计遭受的投资损失最终恐达20%至30%。中国已经使它自己陷入了一个美元陷阱,而且既无法使自己从中解脱出来,也无法改变先前使它陷入其中的那些政策。


  实际上,对于中国是否应继续购买美国国债,长期以来国内都有非常激烈的争论。现在,大多数经济学家和公众都不主张购买美国国债,其观点认为,既然美国国债的市场价值可能继续缩水,而且金融市场稳定之后美元可能大幅贬值,继续增持国债意味着未来可能出现更大损失,此举不符合中国的国家利益。


  那么,在通胀预期上升,美国国债利率下跌之际,日本缘何反其道而行之?有分析认为,其一,日本的美国国债持有量超过中国后,国债价格下跌,则意味着其资产缩水;其二,国债价格下降,则意味着美元需求减弱,也意味着日元相对美元走强,这必然会对日本与美国的出口贸易产生负面影响。


  虽然美国国债收益率为40多年来最低,但日本仍认为美国有可能会重蹈自己“失落十年”的覆辙,也因此,日本对美国国债的青睐程度重新超过了中国。他们能做的,也只剩下努力去支撑起美元,不要让其下跌得过于凶猛。因为,这不仅意味着日本的出口要受到打击,更可能意味着,美元取代日元成为套利首选工具的可能性进一步上升。


  随着世界主要发达经济体降低利率,日本原来的低利率已经不再是形单影只,这也意味着,一直吸引着投资者的“息差交易”吸引力已经大大减弱。利率差缩小,则意味着此类操作的总收益大大缩水。由于美国的利率已经降至接近零的区间,投资者是否会以美元取代日本低息货币的角色,改用美元与欧元、澳元这类相对的高息货币进行配对,无人知晓。


  需要承认的是,拥有或减持大量美国国债,不可避免会产生政治和战略意义。这是一个很简单的道理,一粒沙子无法影响天平的平衡,一大袋沙子却肯定会影响天平的平衡状况。拥有少量的美国国债,美国政府可能并不会太在意,成为美国的第一大或第二大债主,却不能不让美国高度关注并谨慎对待。


  因此,中国增持或减持美国国债的任何举动,都会引发各种从政治和战略角度的解读。这种解读有时不免夸张,但并非全属空穴来风。《华尔街日报》的一篇分析文章认为,近两个月中国减持美国国债是利用自己手头的美元资产,是在向美国施压,反击美国在贸易以及汇率政策上对中国的攻击;即使算不上施压,也是在向美国发出信号。这是中国向美国贸易政策和巨额赤字发出“无声的抗议”。

  我们欣慰地看到,日本持有美国国债超过中国,等于替中国把包袱背起来了。这对我们是一件好事。在购买美国国债方面,中国应让日本去挑大头。换一个角度看,中国与其大量购买美国国债,还不如用这些钱来激活内需,让国民受益。中国本身就是一个大市场,这是国内经济发展战略不可忽略的事实。中国目前正处于努力激发国内消费潜力的正确轨道上。如果相信内需的潜力较大,辅以适当的政策确保国内投资增长,那么对外需放缓的担忧就可以大减轻。

This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Mexico: EU: Concern for the Press

Austria: Donald Trump Revives the Liberals in Canada

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Germany: Cynicism, Incompetence and Megalomania

Israel: Trump’s National Security Adviser Forgot To Leave Personal Agenda at Home and Fell

Topics

Mexico: EU: Concern for the Press

Austria: Musk, the Man of Scorched Earth

Germany: Cynicism, Incompetence and Megalomania

Switzerland: Donald Trump: 100 Days Already, but How Many Years?

     

Austria: Donald Trump Revives the Liberals in Canada

Germany: Absolute Arbitrariness

Israel: Trump’s National Security Adviser Forgot To Leave Personal Agenda at Home and Fell

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Related Articles

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Venezuela: Vietnam: An Outlet for China

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Hong Kong: Can US Tariffs Targeting Hong Kong’s ‘Very Survival’ Really Choke the Life out of It?