Will U.S. Support for Philippines Replace Support for Japan in Containing China?

Published in Nanfang Daily
(China) on 4 May 2011
by Emcee: Liu Qingdong Guests: He Zhou, He Zhou, Li Wei (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Liangzi He. Edited by Gillian Palmer.
According to the Global Times report, the Philippines’ Malaya website quoted authorities on April 29 that the United States would probably assist the Philippines in containing China in Asia, since Japan was busy enough with its own affairs after the huge earthquake and tsunami. The news also claimed that the U.S. would continue supporting Filipino army building, strengthening its coastal monitoring capability. At the same time, helicopters and ships bought from the U.S. will be transported to the Philippines before the rainy season. However, some experts worried that such action might cause a military conflict between China and the Philippines regarding the sovereignty issue in the South China Sea.

According to the source, since Japan has been busy with local relief work after the March 11 earthquake, tsunami and nuclear crisis, the U.S. intends to use the Philippines to fill the gap so as to maintain security and stability in Asia. At the same time, with the expression of concern about China’s increasing power in the Asia-Pacific region, this source pointed out that the U.S. regarded the Philippines as a long-term trustworthy ally; in addition, the blank left by Japan’s disaster and weakening power will be filled by the Philippines.

The source also stated that the policy of U.S.-Filipino cooperation included vigorous promotion of the ongoing modernization of the Filipino armed forces. He also claimed that the Philippines’ coastal monitoring is the most important thing and added that it was necessary to deliver the helicopters and ships bought from the U.S. before the rainy season. In related news, Victor Manhit, the head of the Filipino consulting firm StratBase in Manila, wrote an article on April 17 claiming that from a regional perspective, this action could possibly lead to a military conflict between China and the Philippines on the issue of the South China Sea’s sovereignty.

Manhit stated that China had a dispute with neighbor countries on the issue of South China Sea sovereignty. China’s naval vessels have interfered with the Philippines’ oil and gas exploration ship in the offshore area of the Philippines’ Forum Energy PLC. The ability of the armed forces to protect their coastal area and airspace is the most indispensible capability to the Philippines. Filipino president Aquino admitted the fact and tried to satisfy the demand.

Ernie Z. Bower, a senior consultant in Southeast Asia and director of the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, pointed out that the Philippines’ military modernization was a “double effort” in both acquiring modern equipment and solving military corruption. Manhit claimed that President Aquino perhaps was the best hope for realizing the two fundamental goals. He also wrote that Navy ships and vessels and air force helicopters would be deployed in Palawan and Sulu Island. The Filipino ground force would get rifles; the navy would probably get more multi-purpose attackers. In addition, the navy would also be expected to get a patrol boat of “Hamilton” level. At the same time, Walter Lohman, the director of U.S. Heritage Foundation Asian Studies Center, held that America’s move to constantly put the Philippines in a “high priority” position indicates that the U.S. already sees the Philippines as an “ally and safe partner.”

As to Obama’s appointment of incumbent CIA director Leon Panetta to succeed Robert Gates as the new Secretary of Defense and nomination of David Petraeus, current U.S. commander in Afghanistan, to assume the directorship of the CIA, Lohman expressed his hope that the policy matters (i.e. bilateral anti-terrorist cooperation) between the Philippines and the U.S. could maintain continuity and the U.S. could keep putting the Philippines in the high priority position of an ally and safe partner.

Apart from that, U.S. senators Daniel Inouye and Thad Cochran recently have visited the Philippines’ capital, Manila, quite often, which gradually convinced outsiders that their visits were related to Washington’s plan of reopening the Subic Bay Military Base. Between the years of 1898-1991, that area was an important base for the U.S. Navy and Marine Corps. However, the spokesperson of the U.S. Embassy in the Philippines, Rebecca Thompson, announced that the two senators’ visit to Subic was to see the economic development there in person and inquire how America can develop the cooperation related projects.


美国会扶持菲律宾取代日本在亚洲遏制中国吗?
2011-05-04 12:54 凤凰网

主持人:刘庆东

嘉 宾:何舟 /何舟/ 李炜

据环球时报报道:菲律宾马来亚网站29日援引权威人士的消息称,由于日本遭受大地震和海啸袭击而忙于救灾自顾不暇,美国可能将转而扶菲律宾在亚洲遏制中国。消息称,美国将继续支持菲律宾军队建设,强化后者沿海监控能力,购自美国的直升机和舰只也将在雨季到来之前运到。不过有专家担心,这可能将使菲律宾与中国因南海主权问题发生军事冲突。

据该消息人士透露,由于自3月11日发生地震并引发海啸及核危机以来,日本一直忙于本土救灾工作,因此美国意欲利用菲律宾来填补这一空白,从而维持亚洲的安全与稳定。在表达对中国在亚太地区的渐增势力感到担忧的同时,该消息人士指出:“美国视菲律宾为一个长期可信任的盟国,而且因日本遇灾、力量削弱而出现的空白,也将由菲律宾来填补。”

该消息人士称,美国“再次与菲合作的政策”包括,大力推动菲律宾武装部队当前正在进行的现代化建设。该消息人士称,“菲律宾沿海监控是重中之重”,并补充道,购自美国的直升机和舰艇也需在“雨季到来之前”运到。在相关新闻中,菲律宾StratBase咨询公司驻马尼拉主管维克托•曼黑特(Victor Manhit)4月17日撰文称:“从区域角度来看,这可能会导致菲国武装部队与中国因南海主权问题发生军事冲突。”

曼黑特称,中国和邻国在南海主权问题有争议。中国海军舰艇曾在菲律宾论坛能源公司(Forum Energy Plc.)勘探的水域干扰菲方石油天然气勘探船。菲武装部队保护其沿海与领空的能力是该国最迫切需要的能力。菲律宾总统阿基诺承认这一事实,并在努力满足相关需求。

东南亚资深顾问及华盛顿战略和国际研究中心主任厄尼•Z•鲍尔(Ernie Z. Bower)指出,菲律宾军事现代化是是获得现代装备、解决军中贪污现象的“双重努力”。Manhit称,阿基诺总统可能是实现这两个根本重要目标的最佳希望。他还写道:“海军舰艇及其他船只,以及空军直升机,将被部署在巴拉望岛和苏禄岛。菲律宾陆军将获得步枪,而海军则有可能会增加更多地多用途攻击机。海军也有望从美国海岸警卫队获得一艘‘汉米尔顿’级巡逻舰。”与此同时,美国传统基金会亚洲研究中心主任沃尔特•洛曼(Walter Lohman)指出,美国连续将菲律宾安排在“高度优先”位置的举动表明,美国已将菲律宾视为“盟国及安全合作伙伴”。

对于奥巴马提名现任中央情报局局长莱昂•帕内塔接替罗伯特•盖茨,出任新一届国防部长,以及提名驻阿富汗美军司令戴维•彼得雷乌斯接替帕内塔,担任中情局局长一事,洛曼表示:“我希望美菲之间的政策事务(如两国在反恐战中的合作)能够保持连贯性,并且把菲律宾作为盟国及安全合作伙伴,放在一个高度优先的位置上。”

此外,最近美国参议员丹尼尔•井上(Daniel Inouye)和泰德•柯克兰(Thad Cochran)密切访问菲律宾首都马尼拉,使外界逐渐确信他们的访问行动,与华盛顿政府重开其位于苏比克湾特区军事基地的计划有关。1898-1991年间,那里曾是美国海军及海军陆战队的一个主要基地。不过,美国驻菲律宾使馆发言人丽贝卡•汤普森(Rebecca Thompson)声称,这两位参议员之所以参观苏比克,是为了亲眼看看那里的经济发展情况,以及询问美国应该如何开展合作的相关事宜。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

United Kingdom: Trump Is Angry with a World That Won’t Give Him Easy Deals

Ukraine: Why Washington Failed To End the Russian Ukrainian War

Taiwan: Taiwan’s Leverage in US Trade Talks

Indonesia: US-China: Tariff, Tension, and Truce

Germany: Trump’s Words and Putin’s Calculus

Topics

Canada: Canada Must Match the Tax Incentives in Trump’s ‘Big Beautiful Bill’

Germany: Big Tech Wants a Say in EU Law: More Might for the Mighty

Germany: Trump’s Disappointment Will Have No Adverse Consequences for Putin*

             

Spain: Global Aid without the US

Spain: Not a Good Time for Solidarity

India: Trump’s Tariffs Have Hit South Korea and Japan: India Has Been Wise in Charting a Cautious Path

Related Articles

Indonesia: US-China: Tariff, Tension, and Truce

China: US Chip Restrictions Backfiring

Thailand: US-China Trade Truce Didn’t Solve Rare Earths Riddle

Taiwan: Taiwan Issue Will Be Harder To Bypass during Future US-China Negotiations

Hong Kong: Amid US Democracy’s Moral Unraveling, Hong Kong’s Role in the Soft Power Struggle