U.S.' New Imperialistic Strategy Violates the Right of the People: Obama Doctrine Lined Up against Venezuela

The ruthless NATO air attack on Libya, which cost thousands of civilian lives in its attempt to overthrow Moammar Gadhafi’s government, was manipulated and created in the CIA and the Pentagon’s laboratories, under the agreement of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, while Obama traveled on an official visit to Brazil. Consequently, NATO emerged as the new executioner, the manager of the dirty work, while Russia and China supported and then complained about the excesses of the operations. A new tactic, but an old colonialist and imperialistic strategy, is to create a lie about “freedom,” “human rights,” “free trade” and so on, to invade countries with oil reserves, minerals, gold, food or water. Any government that does not accept these concepts or U.S. terms is a target of military aggression.

There are many naïve who view America as the beacon of freedom and economic possibilities, as well as an opposition to Venezuela: hypocrites in the very same nation where thousands are unemployed, a nation unable to revive its economy. The U.S. declares war to try and overcome its structural crisis, as did Hitler’s Nazi government in World War II. To prove the aforementioned, enough can be found in recent statements from his advisers, who very clearly establish the rules of the game. And the Obama administration assumes that throughout the development of aggression in Libya, there is now a new focus to violently carry out a change of government in other countries of the world. This is how it was announced by one of the U.S. president’s advisers on international affairs, Ben Rhodes. In an interview with Foreign Policy, he said that “the new U.S. strategy is more effective and less costly.” If the U.S. attitude during the George Bush administration centered on occupation, then Obama’s objective during his is national liberation. In addition, the adviser mentions two new principles: The regime change is done directly by a national movement, and the U.S. shares the international responsibility with its allies.

The Venezuelan opposition applauds the intervention in Libya and the new puppet government.

This new world situation is a serious threat to human society. War and death are imposed through dialogue, on the rights of the people to their self-determination or to the right to protect their economic model. The new international relations supported by the UN allow any sort of international aggression from the five permanent member countries of the Security Council with veto power: the United States, England, and France are imperialist partners and Russia navigates in its historical inconsistencies, while China does not act as a socialist country. Both do not use the right to veto, but afterward, they demagogically accuse the others of not respecting the agreement.

The opposition wants the Bolivarian government to establish relations with the de facto government, even wanting to make a statement like the Bureau of Democratic Unity, as if they were the government. Perhaps it is an attempt to form a process similar to that of the 2002 coup, to now appeal to the Obama government to intervene in Venezuela, regardless of the possible cost of a military adventure among the Venezuelan people.

In this regard, and referring to the old dreams of destabilization campaigns, the deputy to the National Assembly and leader of the United Socialist Party of Venezuela, Héctor Navarro, emphasized that there is a connection between the members of the Bureau of Democratic Unity and the intelligence agencies of the United States. In the Toda Venezuela program, broadcasted by Venezolana de Televisión (VTV),” Navarro said it was “strange,” speaking of the coincidence in the simultaneity of the statements of former U.S. Assistant Secretary Roger Noriega and some representatives of the Venezuelan right on the repatriation measure of gold reserves.

The deputy added, “There exists a suspicious relationship, because they have not clarified how there are coincidences in the timing and content in their statements. The connection between them and the CIA does exist.” In addition, Navarro said that the opposition’s speech in parliament on Thursday, when he discussed the repatriation measure of gold, valued at $11 billion, was devoid of content. “We would have liked a debate with more content from the right,” Navarro expressed, also reporting that out of 65 opposition deputies, only 28 attended. Finally, he explained that within the heart of the Bureau of Democratic Unity, “there are conflicts, primarily for the struggle of power.”