When Colin Powell Sold His Honor

Published in Aftonbladet
(Sweden) on 10 September 2011
by Fredrik Virtanen (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Grace Olaison. Edited by Heidi Kaufmann.
I was in the UN headquarters when Colin Powell sold his honor and started a war on Feb. 5, 2003. There is nothing as nauseating as seeing a big man crushed to dust, especially when hundreds of thousands of people die as a result.

Otherwise, Secretary of State Powell was long the most credible figure in George W. Bush’s administration; he was far more respectable than hawks like Rumsfeld, Rove and Wolfowitz, despite ― or probably due to ― the fact that he was a four-star general and previously served as Secretary of Defense.

Powell had long held a low, almost anonymous profile. He made no false attempts to link the terrorist, Osama bin Laden, to Iraq’s dictator, Saddam Hussein — two people that the average American could barely distinguish due to Bush’s cleverly fuzzy rhetoric in his numerous TV speeches.

America was already a nation at war; absurd patriotism lay like a suffocating blanket over domestic debate; everyone who questioned Bush’s false claims about Iraqi weapons of mass destruction were latté-drinking liberals with no balls.

Any hope of decency and honesty lay with Powell.

He then stepped up to the UN’s rostrum and sold the war. He even sold his soul. He sold his credibility. He stood before the world and stated that there were links between bin Laden and Saddam Hussein and showed blurry satellite images from the CIA that allegedly showed weapons of mass destruction.

Powell was under enormous pressure from Bush; he had doubts but chose to stand behind his government. Afterwards, he tried to save his skin and claimed that he had been duped by the CIA — that at the time he really believed that the evidence was “solid.”

Powell lied.

I have always considered that the invasion of Iraq had already started then, on Feb. 5, because a man who could have made a difference chose not to. He became the direct opposite of American icons like JFK or Martin Luther King. They spread hope; Powell spread shattered illusions.

If Powell had chosen to launch his speech with the words “I cannot say anything that I myself do not believe in,” the whole of Bush’s war machine would have broken down, Bush would not have been able to continue ignoring the UN, the USA’s following decade would have been significantly brighter and the UN would have, in the end, found a shrewder method of handling the ruthless dictator, Saddam Hussein.

Colin Powell had the power to change the world’s path. He chose the lie. It was terrible to see. At the press conference afterward, I felt ill just looking at him.

It was an exhibition of a great man’s pitifulness, something we all can learn from. We are defined by our choices.


Jag var i FN-huset när Colin Powell sålde sin heder och startade ett krig, den 5 februari 2003.

Det finns inget vämjeligare än att se en stor människa krympa till en spillra, i synnerhet när hundra-tusentals människor dör som följd.

Utrikesminister Powell var annars länge den trovärdigaste i George W Bushs administration, långt mer anständig än krigshökar som Rumsfeld, Rove och Wolfowitz, trots – eller förmodligen tack vare – att han var flerstjärnig general och tidigare USA:s försvarschef.

Powell hade länge hållit en låg, närmast anonym profil. Inga falska försök att koppla terrorristen Usama bin Ladin till Iraks diktator Saddam

Hussein – två personer som en genomsnittsamerikan sällan såg skillnad på, på grund av Bushs smart luddiga retorik i sina många tv-tal.

USA var redan ett land i krig, dumpatriotismen låg som en kvävande filt över inrikesdebatten, alla som ifrågasatte Bushs falska påståenden om irakiska massförstörelsevapen var lattedrickande pissliberaler utan stake.



Hoppet om anständighet och ärlighet stod till Powell.

Då klev han upp i FN:s talarstol och sålde kriget. Han sålde även sin själ. Han sålde sin trovärdighet. Han stod inför världen och påstod att det fanns kopplingar mellan bin Ladin och Saddam Hussein och visade luddiga satellitbilder från CIA som påstods visa massförstörelsevapen.

Powell var under enorm press från Bush, han hade dubier men valde att ställa upp för sin regering. I efterhand försökte han rädda sitt skinn och påstod sig ha blivit duperad av CIA, att han där och då verkligen trodde att bevisen var ”solida”.

Powell ljög.

Jag har alltid ansett att invasionen av Irak startade redan där, den 5 februari, på grund av att en man som hade kunnat göra skillnad valde att inte. Den direkta motsatsen till amerikanska ikoner som JFK eller Martin Luther King. De spred hopp, Powell spred brustna illusioner.



Om Powell valt att avgå med orden ”jag kan inte säga något jag inte själv tror på” skulle hela Bushs krigsmaskineri skurit ihop. Bush hade inte längre kunnat strunta i FN, USA:s kommande tio år hade blivit betydligt ljusare och FN hade till sist

hittat ett klyftigare sätt att handskas med den grymme diktatorn Hussein.

Colin Powell hade makten att förändra världens gång. Han valde lögnen. Det var fruktansvärt att se. Vid presskonferensen efteråt mådde jag dåligt av att titta på honom.

Det var en uppvisning i en stor mans ynkedom som vi alla kan lära av. Vi är alla våra val.

This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Australia: Tech Billionaires To Reap the Rewards of Trump’s Strongarm Tax Tactics

Argentina: Middle East: From Nuclear Agreement to Preventive Attack, Who’s in Control?

Germany: NATO Secretary General Showers Trump with Praise: It Seems Rutte Wanted To Keep the Emperor Happy

Canada: Elbows Down on the Digital Services Tax

Canada: How Ottawa Gift-Wrapped our Dairy Sector for Trump

Topics

Australia: Australia Is Far from Its Own Zohran Mamdani Moment. Here’s Why

Canada: How Ottawa Gift-Wrapped our Dairy Sector for Trump

Canada: New York Swoons over an American Justin Trudeau

Germany: Europe Bending the Knee to Trump

Germany: NATO Secretary General Showers Trump with Praise: It Seems Rutte Wanted To Keep the Emperor Happy

China: US Chip Restrictions Backfiring

China: US Visa Policy Policing Students

Pakistan: American Jingoism Hurts Americans

Related Articles

Austria: Elon Musk Could Learn a Lesson in Sweden

Finland: The US Expects Finland and Sweden To Join NATO at the Same Time

Malaysia: NATO Goes Nordic

Venezuela: Eyes on the Atlantic Alliance

Sweden: The New US-China Strategy: A Red Flag for Beijing