No End to Financing America’s Major Financial Institutions

Published in Nikkei
(Japan) on 24 October 2011
by Editorial (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Kenny Nagata. Edited by Alyssa Goulding.  .
Wall Street, which has played the role of circulating necessary funds for growth in the global economy, has not been able to find a new form of money-lending since the collapse of Lehman Brothers. This kind of worry was often reflected in America’s financial institutions between July and September of this year.

Goldman Sachs was in the red for the first time in three years during that quarter. On top of the bond market being in stagnation, which was a significant source of revenue, there were large losses in private equity investments. The loss of profits with these types of transactions is the result not only of temporary changes in market prices, but also due to the influence of tightened restrictions.

With last year’s financial regulatory reform, financial institutions were forbidden from self-trading. In dealing with the regulations, major financial institutions, beginning with Goldman, have drastically reduced their self-trading divisions.

It was the desirable outcome from the perspective of protecting against another crisis. However, the real economy may be influenced as it seems that the major U.S. financial institutions, which have sent large quantities of risk money into the economy, are shrinking and seem unable to pull out of their situation.

The headwinds are not stopping against comprehensive financial institutions that operate securities and commercial banks simultaneously. Losses on loans that are targeted for corporations are tending to shrink, but the persistently high unemployment level makes it difficult for businesses that target individuals to make a profit.

At the end of September, Bank of America’s total assets were $2.22 trillion, down 5 percent from last year, passing the baton to JPMorgan Chase & Co., whose $2.29 trillion in assets is the largest in America. This is the result of consolidating assets, in which losses were dealt with under the umbrella of the major mortgage companies.

The U.S. Federal Reserve Board has introduced a twist to increase the share of long-term national bonds without changing the scope of their assets. It aims to stimulate the economy by urging the lowering of the long-term interest rate, but the problem is that the profit margin of financing thins out over time due to the reduction of the variable interest rates for the bank.

When not only Europe’s, but also America’s financial system causes adverse conditions, the world’s economy cannot escape the negative influence. It will be necessary to keep a watchful eye on the structure of American finances.




世界経済の成長に必要なお金を循環させる役割を担ってきた米ウォール街が、リーマン・ショック後の新しい金融業の姿を見つけられないでいる。米金融機関の2011年7~9月期決算にそうした苦悩がよく表れていた。

ゴールドマン・サックスは四半期としては約3年ぶりに赤字決算となった。収益源だった債券などの売買業務が不振だったうえ、未公開株への投資から多額の損失が発生した。こうした市場取引で収益が上げられなかったのは、相場の変動といった一時要因だけでなく、規制強化も影響している。

昨年成立した米金融規制改革法では、金融機関の自己売買が禁じられる方向にある。規制に対応するため、ゴールドマンをはじめとする大手金融機関は、自己売買部門を大幅に縮小した。

危機の再発を防ぐという観点からは望ましい動きだ。しかし、経済に大量のリスクマネーを送ってきた米大手金融機関が縮み志向から抜け出せないようだと、実体経済に影響が出かねない。

証券業と商業銀行を兼営している総合金融機関への逆風もやまない。企業向け融資の焦げつきは縮小傾向にあるが、失業率の高止まりなどによって個人関連の業務が利益を生みにくくなっている。

バンク・オブ・アメリカは9月末の総資産が2兆2200億ドルと1年前に比べ5%減り、2兆2900億ドルだったJPモルガン・チェースに全米最大の座を明け渡した。傘下に持つ大手住宅ローン会社の損失処理を進め、資産を圧縮した結果だ。

米連邦準備理事会(FRB)は保有資産の規模を変えずに長期国債の比重を高めるツイス
ト・オペを導入した。長期金利の低下を促し景気刺激を狙うものだが、銀行にとっては長短の金利差の縮小に伴い融資の利ザヤが薄くなってしまうという問題がある。

欧州だけでなく米国の金融システムも変調をきたすと、世界景気への悪影響は免れない。米金融の構造変化への目配りも必要だ。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Topics

Poland: Meloni in the White House. Has Trump Forgotten Poland?*

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats

Mauritius: Could Trump Be Leading the World into Recession?

India: World in Flux: India Must See Bigger Trade Picture

Palestine: US vs. Ansarallah: Will Trump Launch a Ground War in Yemen for Israel?

Ukraine: Trump Faces Uneasy Choices on Russia’s War as His ‘Compromise Strategy’ Is Failing

Related Articles

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats

Japan: US-Japan Defense Minister Summit: US-Japan Defense Chief Talks Strengthen Concerns about Single-Minded Focus on Strength

Japan: Trump’s Tariffs Threaten To Repeat Historical Mistakes

Hong Kong: China, Japan, South Korea Pave Way for Summit Talks; Liu Teng-Chung: Responding to Trump

Japan: Partial Cease-fire: Avoid Putin’s Pace

Previous article
Next article