Internet Application Strikes Fear among Retailers

Published in La Nacion
(Argentina) on 15 December 2011
by Ariel Baños (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Eugenia Lucchelli. Edited by Katya Abazajian .
Now, here are two situations that occur more and more frequently in Argentina and on a worldwide scale:

First scenario: A client walks into a shop and asks the shop assistant about a particular product. The salesman, very kindly, shows the product, allows the customer to try it, and explains in detail its functionality and benefits. The client asks about the product's price and leaves the shop.

Second scenario: The client gets to his house, checks about the said products on the internet, and finds lower prices than in the shop, so he selects a site that he trusts and makes the purchase through the internet.

Price Check, an Amazon app that compares prices, has unleashed the rage of traditional shops that accuse it of paying its customers to spy for the company.

The proliferation of sales websites, especially online, generates a price distribution that more experienced shoppers can profit from. This situation occurs in a wide variety of categories of products such as electronics, household appliances, clothing, car parts, toys and books, among others.

Retailers usually denounce this distortion of prices to manufacturers and importers, who find it extremely hard to resolve these situations, which they shouldn’t ignore.

The traditional sales business claims that the imbalance of prices happens because, while they need to make big investments in shops, stock and staff, electronic channels can function on a fraction of those costs. The traditional businesses’ greatest fear is to become the showroom for products sold over the internet.

This fear seems unjustified because in recent years, traditional commerce has grown as much as e-commerce. One of the factors that limits the potential growth of online trade (actually the only one) is how time consuming comparing prices is. Up to now, this effort is only justified in the most expensive products.

However, this is changing. Comparing prices is becoming increasingly easy and fast. In some countries, simply by downloading a special application onto your mobile phone with a camera and internet access, you can scan the bar codes of articles and get to know the prices in other shops instantly, especially online shops. Furthermore, this comparison can be done taking a picture with a cell phone or via voice recognition technology, which requires saying the product’s name.

Is this a distant future? No way. In a polemic move, Amazon offered a five dollar discount in the States for clients who, using Amazon’s Price Check, scanned the price tag of a product in an actual shop and then compared it with their site. This promotion aimed at stimulating the usage of Amazon Price Check. Also, this made it possible to gather data about their competitors’ prices, which were identified using the phone’s GPS. This promotion caused the rage of many conventional shops that accused Amazon of paying its clients to be its price “spies”.

The answers from shop owners did not take long. Many chambers repudiated Amazon’s actions and even created Facebook groups of indignant people, like “Occupy Amazon”. The dispute has just begun.

Clearly these kinds of applications will revolutionize trade worldwide. The number of stowaway consumers, or “free riders,” who get advice about a product in a conventional store only to later purchase it online, will rise if prices continue to decrease, and so will intervention by products’ owners. That is to say it will be crucial that manufacturers and importers see if the point of the traditional sales industry’s destiny is to become more than a mere showroom.


A continuación, dos situaciones que ocurren cada vez con mayor frecuencia en Argentina y en todo el mundo:

Escena 1: un cliente entra al local, y consulta a un vendedor sobre un producto en particular. El vendedor, con gran amabilidad, muestra el producto, permite que el cliente lo pruebe, y explica con lujo de detalle las funciones y beneficios. El cliente consulta el precio y se retira del local.

Escena 2: el cliente llega a su casa, consulta en internet sobre el producto en cuestión, y encuentra precios menores a los del local visitado. Entonces selecciona un sitio de su confianza y realiza la compra a través de internet.

La proliferación de canales de venta, particularmente en formato on-line, genera una dispersión de precios que puede ser aprovechada por los clientes más avezados. Esta situación ocurre gran cantidad de categorías de productos, como electrónicos, electrodomésticos, textiles, autopartes, juguetes y libros, entre otros.

Los puntos de venta suelen reclamar por esta distorsión de precios a fabricantes e importadores, quienes se las ven en figurillas para encausar este tipo de situaciones, de las que no deberían desentenderse.

El comercio tradicional argumenta que los desequilibrios de precios ocurren porque mientras ellos realizan grandes inversiones en locales, inventarios, y personal, los canales electrónicos pueden funcionar con una fracción de esas inversiones. El gran temor del comercio tradicional es convertirse en el salón de exhibición de los sitios de venta por internet.

En principio este miedo parece injustificado. En los últimos años ha crecido tanto el comercio tradicional, como el electrónico. Uno de los factores (no el único) que limita el crecimiento del comercio electrónico es la dificultad y el tiempo que requiere comparar precios. Hasta ahora este esfuerzo sólo está justificado en los productos más costosos.

¿Es un futuro lejano? Para nada. En una polémica jugada, el pasado 10 de diciembre, Amazon ofreció en Estados Unidos, un descuento de 5 dólares a aquellos clientes que, utilizando la aplicación para celulares Amazon Price Check, escanearan el precio de un producto en un local físico, y luego lo compraran en Amazon. La promoción apuntaba a estimular el uso del comparador de precios de Amazon. Además permitía recopilar información de precios de competidores, que eran identificados a través de la función de geolocalización, activada en el celular. Esta promoción desató la ira de muchos comercios tradicionales que acusaron a Amazon de pagar a los clientes por ser sus "espías" de precios.

Las respuestas de los comerciantes no tardaron en llegar. Numerosas cámaras repudiaron esta acción de Amazon, e inclusive se crearon grupos de Facebook de "indignados", como por ejemplo Occupy Amazon . La disputa recién comienza.

Sin dudas este tipo de aplicaciones revolucionará el comercio en todo el mundo. Crecerá el número de "consumidores polizones" o "free-riders", es decir aquellos que se asesoran y prueban el producto en los comercios tradicionales, para luego adquirirlo en forma on-line, a un precio menor. Las respuestas del comercio tradicional, y fundamentalmente la intervención de los "dueños" del producto, es decir fabricantes e importadores, serán cruciales para ver si el destino del punto de venta es algo más que ser un mero salón de exhibición
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Brazil: Perplexity, Skepticism, Desperation

Russia: ‘Have Fun’*

Russia: Obama Has Escaped a False START

Poland: Meloni in the White House. Has Trump Forgotten Poland?*

Topics

Poland: Meloni in the White House. Has Trump Forgotten Poland?*

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats

Mauritius: Could Trump Be Leading the World into Recession?

India: World in Flux: India Must See Bigger Trade Picture

Palestine: US vs. Ansarallah: Will Trump Launch a Ground War in Yemen for Israel?

Ukraine: Trump Faces Uneasy Choices on Russia’s War as His ‘Compromise Strategy’ Is Failing

Related Articles

Argentina: Trump Is Laying His Cards Down

Argentina: The US-China Microprocessor War

Argentina: Help for Trump in 2024

Argentina: Understanding a 2nd Cold War