Fighting without Breaking Ties Will Be the Theme of Sino-American Relations

Published in China.com
(China) on 11 June 2012
by Qi Ming (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Thomas Merckens. Edited by .

Edited by Anita Dixon

 

President Aquino of the Philippines’ recent trip to America received a great amount of foreign attention. President Obama and Secretary of State Hilary Clinton both met with him. Clinton expressed that America has already stressed many times that they have no position on the South China Sea territory dispute and that they encourage settling the Huangyan Island issue through diplomatic dialogue. Obama, however, praised Aquino as “a thoughtful and very helpful partner,” promising to ensure free travel in the South China Sea.

Common belief among the outside world is that Aquino’s trip to the USA was merely “joining America to regulate China,” but overall the rewards weren’t very large. America continues to be neutral on this sensitive issue, having never taken aggressive measures. Looking at the present, even though America and the Philippines have a military alliance, America will never wage war on China on behalf of the Philippines.

Recently, the South China Sea dispute has become more international and complex. The Philippines, Vietnam, and other countries are continuously strengthening their actual presence and control in the contested maritime territory and islands of the South China Sea. While China and the Philippines are deadlocked on the Huangyan Island issue, American Secretary of Defense Panetta is bombastically declaring that America will maintain six aircraft carrier strike groups in the Asia-Pacific region and that by 2020, 60 percent of battleships will be deployed in the Pacific Ocean. American “migration of military power east” both agrees with the interests of American economic development and also the strategy of surrounding and laying out a defense against China.

The Relationship Among the Dominant Nations in the End Is a Competitive One

For the past few years, the American and Chinese economies have been in a give and take, with America clearly feeling the pressure from China. America has always worried that a rise in China’s strength would constitute a threat and containing China’s development and power has already become a principal strategic mission. Using disputes between China and surrounding nations over issues such as territory and the fishing industry, America has continuously incited and instigated surrounding nations to create a disturbance and cause China increased disorder. At the same time, America is constantly strengthening military alliances with countries such as Japan and South Korea, as well as strengthening military presence in Southeast Asia. America frequently conducts military exercises with China’s surrounding nations, including Japan, South Korea, Australia, India, the Philippines, Vietnam, Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia, Cambodia, Thailand and Mongolia, thus strengthening their own military presence and developing new roads for military development. Resources show that in 2011 America conducted a total of 172 bilateral and multilateral military exercises in the Asia-Pacific region. The South China Sea dispute is already becoming an important starting point for America’s pinning down of China.

Lieutenant-General Ren Haiquan, vice president of the China Military Academy, responded to American “migration of military power east” at the Shangri-La Dialogue, where I believe he in actuality represented the entire Chinese military. Lieutenant-General Ren Haiquan expressed that we should not regard this phenomenon as desperately serious, but we also should not be indifferent, instead preparing for the worst while striving for the best. He went so far as to frankly say that when the fundamental interests of our nation are threatened, he will take counteractive measures and strike fear into their hearts. One can imagine, if war broke out between China and America, it’s possible that this world could be completely destroyed.

Due to the conflict produced by the structure of the international system, the differences in American and Chinese politics and society and the influences of third party factors, Sino-American relations are doomed to layer upon layer of conflict. However, both nations are equally interested in seeking dialogue and cooperation. So far, there are already upwards of 60 regularly scheduled dialogues between Chinese and American deputy secretaries and high-ranking officials. At present China and America are already bound together in economics. If China withdrew from the U.S. market, a large part of China’s foreign trade industry would shut down and a great number of workers would lose their jobs. This would not only inflict heavy damage on the economy, but would jeopardize social stability. In addition, if America were to leave behind China’s cheap products and U.S. dollar loans, it would not only make America’s bad economy even worse, but would also potentially destabilize the entire U.S. currency system.

At present international relations are tangled and complicated and the safety challenges China is facing are diverse, complicated and severe. Even if America repeatedly publicizes its position, that it is not looking to restrain China’s policies and welcomes China’s peaceful emergence to power, what America says and does are not completely identical. For the Diaoyu Islands issue, the South China Sea issue and the Taiwan issue, America has sufficient strategic weaponry to counter China. To calmly and actively dissolve these crises and threats, we need to cultivate a new way of thinking. Current Sino-Russian relations are the best in history. America is not only restraining China, but is similarly restraining Russia. China and Russia don’t have the power to respond to the challenge of America and its allies on their own. They can only form an alliance and strategically advance and retreat, jointly standing against America. This will in fact give rise to the establishment of a mechanism of checks, balances, and restrictions, functioning to make America exercise a bit of restraint on their own actions.

America has already constructed a system of alliances surrounding China. If China invariably remains steady, then it will never be able to break away from America and be fair to its surrounding nations. China has its own strategic interests and if America and its agents in Southeast Asia encroach on China’s core interests, China will have to pay a large price. This is not only a matter of power, but also a matter of confidence and intelligence.


菲律宾总统阿基诺最近的美国之行受到外界高度关注,美国国务卿希拉里和美国总统奥巴马先后会晤了他。希拉里表示美国已数次强调,对南海领土争议不持立场,并鼓励通过外交对话解决黄岩岛问题。奥巴马则称赞阿基诺是一位“有思想又有益的伙伴”,承诺将确保南海航行自由。外界普遍认为阿基诺这次美国之行就是“联美制华”,但总体收获并不大,美国在这一敏感问题上继续保持中立,未有过激言行。目前看,尽管美国和菲律宾是军事同盟关系,但美国永远不会为了菲律宾而与中国兵戎相见。

近一段时间以来,南海争端日益国际化、复杂化。菲律宾、越南等国正不断加强对南海争议海域及其岛屿的实际存在和控制。就在中国与菲律宾在黄岩岛问题上僵持不下之时,美国国防部长帕内塔在新加坡高调宣布,美国将在亚太地区保持6个航母打击群,并在2020年前将60%的战舰部署到太平洋。美国“军力东移”,既符合美国经济发展利益,也可战略围堵和布防中国。

大国之间的关系,说到底是竞争关系。

近年来美国与中国经济此消彼长,美国明显感到来自中国的压力。美国一直担忧中国实力壮大后会对其构成威胁,遏制中国的发展和强大已成为主要战略任务。美国利用中国与周边国家领土和渔业纠纷等问题,不断唆使和怂恿周边国家制造事端,给中国添乱。与此同时,不断强化美日、美韩等军事同盟,加强对东南亚地区的军事渗透,频繁与中国周边国家举行军事演习,这些国家包括日本、韩国、澳大利亚、印度、菲律宾、越南、新加坡、马来西亚、印尼、柬埔寨、泰国和蒙古等,从而强化自己的军事存在,并为军事工业发展开辟道路。有资料显示,2011年美国一共在亚太地区举行了172次双边和多边军事演习。目前南海争端已经成为美国牵制中国的一个主要抓手。

参加香格里拉对话的军事科学院副院长任海泉中将已对美国“军力东移”作出回应,个人认为他实际上代表了中国军方。任海泉中将表示,对此不要看成不得了,也不要当作无所谓,从最坏处准备,向最好处努力。他甚至坦言,当我们国家根本利益受到威胁的时候,我也会有反击的手段,让你感到非常恐惧。可以想象,如果中美之间爆发战争,这个世界完全有可能彻底毁灭。

由于国际体系结构产生的矛盾、中美政治社会制度差异和第三方因素的影响,中美关系注定矛盾重重。但是,中美两国均有意寻求对话与合作。迄今为止,中美之间副部长以上的定期对话机制已有60多个。目前的中美两国已经在经济上互相捆绑,离开美国市场,中国的外贸企业会大量倒闭,工人会大量失业,不但会造成经济上的重创,更会危及社会稳定;而离开中国的廉价商品和美元借款,不但会使美国经济雪上加霜,更有可能动摇整个美元金融体系。

当今国际关系错综复杂,中国面临的安全挑战是多元、复杂和严峻的,尽管美国方面多次正面公开表态,不寻求对中国实施遏制政策,欢迎中国和平崛起,但美国说的和做的并不完全一致。钓鱼岛问题、南海问题、台湾问题,美国手中有足够的战略武器针对中国。冷静而又积极地化解这些危机、威胁,需要我们创新思维。目前中俄关系正处于历史最好时期,美国不仅在遏制中国,也一样在遏制俄罗斯,中俄没有实力单独去应对美国及其盟友的挑战,只有结盟共进退,共同抗衡美国。这样做实际上起到建立一种制衡和制约机制、让美国收敛一下自己行为的作用。

美国已经在中国周边构建了一个同盟和准同盟体系,如果中国一味求稳,那么将永远无法摆脱美国、摆平周边。中国有自己的战略利益,如果美国及其在亚太地区的代理人侵犯中国核心利益,都必须付出巨大代价。这不仅是力量问题,也是信心问题、智慧问题。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Afghanistan: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Russia: Political Analyst Reveals the Real Reason behind US Tariffs*

Topics

Afghanistan: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Russia: Political Analyst Reveals the Real Reason behind US Tariffs*

Poland: Meloni in the White House. Has Trump Forgotten Poland?*

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats

Mauritius: Could Trump Be Leading the World into Recession?

Related Articles

Afghanistan: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Hong Kong: Can US Tariffs Targeting Hong Kong’s ‘Very Survival’ Really Choke the Life out of It?

Cuba: Trump, Panama and the Canal