The Sino-American Chess Game at the Pacific Islands

Published in Ming Pao
(Hong Kong) on 5 September 2012
by Simon Shen (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Winnie Yeung. Edited by Mary Young.
Starting from Clinton’s Visit to the Cook Islands

During United States Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s visit to the Asia-Pacific area, her visit to China naturally received the most attention from Chinese-speaking media. But the first stop on her itinerary was actually the most intriguing. It was an island country in the South Pacific where no American official of her rank — nor even any non-American official of her rank — has ever set foot: the Cook Islands. It is here where she took part in the Pacific Islands Forum, in recognition of its importance for the United States.

Pacific Island Countries and Containment Theory

I have already mentioned the background of the Cook Islands and the questions concerning the independence of this island, which signed an agreement of free association with New Zealand. Why would this tiny island country of only 20,000 inhabitants and 240 square kilometers attract a visit from the secretary of state of the greatest country on earth? With a company of aircraft carriers to boot? Why did People’s Daily criticize the visit immediately? Really, what is the importance of a tiny country like this?

The most obvious purpose of Clinton’s visit is to inform the world that even the most remote ends of the earth are still within the United States’ sphere of influence. Despite the fact that China has become the largest trading partner and creditor for a number of Pacific Island countries, strategically these island countries are still under the sphere of influence of Australia and New Zealand who, in turn, are under that of the United States. In the eyes of Beijing, the United States’ attempts to cozy up to these countries aligns with Obama’s proclamation, “Let there be no doubt: in the Asia-Pacific in the 21st century, the United States of America is all in.”

It could be similar to the game in which the United States persuades Japan and the Philippines to oppose China. For the last ten years, Beijing invested a lot of resources in this region, whereas White House aid is a mere blank check never realized. If these island countries act like the Philippines, which asks for China’s money while asking for protection from the United States, obviously this is not something that Beijing would like to see. Moreover, when China entered the Southern Pacific, it did not seize it from the American sphere, whereas Clinton arrived late to the table and took it over. Beijing interpreted this as the destruction of the trust that China and the United States had built up over the past decade.

South-North Pacific and the Sino-American Sphere of Influence

For the past few decades, the United States has overlooked the Southern Pacific, where the Cook Islands are located. Among the Pacific Island countries, America has been focusing solely on the Northern Pacific, which contains the American territory of Guam, Saipan, part of the Marianas Islands — which signed an agreement of free association with the United States — the Marshall Islands — the almost-American colony that has the right to vote in the United Nations — Micronesia, Palau, and so on. This region holds important strategic importance for monitoring competitors in this region. It was a must-conquer place for Japan, and it still fits this description, where China has become the new competitor. If China cozies up to these islands, the United States will be extremely cautious.

The Southern Pacific has for a long time been regarded as a utopia where no big battles have ever taken place. It is not of great importance for the United States, which does not even care to give aid to these countries. However, since Pacific Island countries were once the battlefield of national recognition between China and Taiwan, China has been paying a lot of attention to this region. Since the 1990s, due to America’s negligence and Australia’s inability to intervene, Chinese influence has been expanding in the Southern Pacific.

The Tonga dynasty is one example: Not only did China provide them a huge amount of aid, it also controls the local economic lifeline. It has established a special relationship with the Princess of Tonga, who controls all enterprises in Conga. China even got involved in the internal power struggle of the Tonga royal family — by the way, the King of Tonga died a month ago in Hong Kong). If this trend continues in areas where China builds up power in the South Pacific, and the United States maintains its control in the North, then the American backyard in the Pacific Ocean will be besieged, which is absolutely unacceptable for American conservatives.

Perils and Opportunities of Globalization in Island Countries

Apart from the short-term value of Secretary of State Clinton’s visit to the Cook Islands, there also exists a long-term strategy, which is worth noting: Who can dismiss the potential of these island countries in several decades’ time?

Resource Potential in Pacific Island Countries

Even though the Cook Islands have a land area of only 240 square kilometers, which is barely a quarter of Hong Kong’s total area, its private economic zone is huge, reaching around 180,000 square kilometers, which is three times France’s total land area. The last natural resources extracted on Earth can be found in these isolated areas; as the glaciers in the North Pole melt due to global warming, this region is a hot spot that countries are coveting.

As to the question of whether valuable resources can be extracted from the seabed of the Pacific Ocean, it is unnecessary: As the economist Julian Simon said, history proved that as long as the technology continues to be developed, as long as the human race maintains its creativity, new energy resources will continue to be discovered. The cost of extracting resources considered difficult to obtain in the past will drop.*

From the newly discovered oil fields and newly running sources of energy in the past decade, this observation matches the facts. Even though the Pacific Islands are not rich at present, as long as foreign investment arrives in the country to develop and survey, they will have a great potential to become rich in the blink of an eye. Acquiring the abundant underground resources of the Southern Pacific Islands is marked by China as a strategic goal. Details can be found in “China Geological Survey: Southern Pacific Islands Undersea Mineral Resources,” a report and cooperative environmental analysis, which marks the Cook Islands sea area as multi-metal ores with great prospects.**

Chinese Speakers Change the Demographics of Island Countries

Another group of facts that great countries should consider is, first, these island countries have really small populations: The Cook Islands has only 20,000, another island that also signed the agreement of free association, Niue, has only 1,400. Even the one with whom we are most familiar, the Conga Kingdom, has a total population that does not exceed 10,000. Its population is nowhere near that of the 1.3 billion Chinese population. If even a few Chinese migrate to these islands, without any planning, it will easily create an effect on the demographics of these countries.

In fact, this is already happening: For example, Conga was engaged in diplomatic relations with Taipei, as the King was increasing disgruntled with the democratization of Taiwan and the fact that the princess had become a trading partner with China. Conga thus established a diplomatic relationship with Beijing. Since then, the Chinese population has skyrocketed to almost 4,000 within several years’ time, making up 3 to 4 percent of the total population of Conga and controlling the economic lifeline of the country. And, of course, it evokes anti-Chinese sentiment there.

Sometimes, Chinese populations cannot be quantified with numbers. In Samoa, one-fourth of the total population is of Chinese heritage, but all register in the census as Samoans. Even if China does not make any moves on the country, it is not hard to imagine what would happen as this phenomenon perpetuates itself. For example, Fiji’s political turmoil in recent years is closely related to the fact that many Indians immigrated there during the period of British colonialism. Now Indians make up 40 percent of the Fijian population and have become a forceful political power there. The only difference is that, unlike China, India does not have long-term immigration policies and thus has not touched on global strategic issues yet.

The Insights of the Hawaiian Model for Beijing

Recalling the 19th century, when Hawaii was an independent Pacific Island country with a total population of only 10,000, history textbooks have detailed records of how the United States has occupied and colonized the island. Of course, it is difficult for modern countries to repeat the same steps. China, which emphasizes peaceful advancement, would not like to engulf other countries. But if China’s power continues to grow, given the aforementioned demographics, the colonization of these islands where Chinese population is significant is not entirely refutable.

The United States’ decision to allow some Northern Pacific Islands (e.g., the Marshall Islands) to sign the agreement of free association, encouraging them to strive for recognition in the international community, is a move to make them its protegés. It sends arrested people, whom no countries wish to receive, to prisons there, and some English colonies serve as tax-free havens. If China is looking for similar functions in those countries, it is not enough to agitate the United States.

But if these countries become the information technology hub for China (for example, the main business between the Conga princess and China includes the princess’ satellite communication business) or the military base for China (China considered buying lands in Iceland, which it eventually decided against because of pressure from the West, which suspected that China would use it as a base in the North Pole area), this would suffice to produce structural changes to American national defense planning. Given their mutual goal of preventing the slightest move into the area, we should not be surprised by Sino-American competition over the tiny Cook Islands.

*Editor’s Note: This paraphrased quotation, though accurately translated, could not be independently verified.

**Editor’s Note: This title, though accurately translated, could not be independently verified.


沈旭暉:中美的太平洋小島大棋局
從希拉里訪庫克群島談起

美國國務卿希拉里任內最後一次訪問亞太區,華文媒體關心的自然是中國之行,但她的首站行程卻最堪玩味,到訪地點是她這個級別的美國官員、乃至任何國家這個級別的官員都從未駐足的南太平洋島國:庫克群島(Cook Islands),並出席當地舉行的太平洋島國論壇首腦會議,也是美國對這區域論壇的最重視表現。

太平洋島國與「圍堵論」

關於庫克群島的背景、這個與新西蘭簽訂「自由聯合協定」的小島是否完全獨立國家等問題,筆者在月前介紹其奧運代表隊時已有談及。為何這個總人口只有約2萬、面積只有240平方公里的小國,會吸引全球第一大國的國務卿來訪?而且還是伴隨一艘航空母艦而來?《人民日報》何以立刻刊文批評?究竟這類小國有何重要性?

希拉里到訪的最直接信息,自然是要告知世界,無論多偏遠的天涯海角,依然是美國的勢力範圍;中國近年雖成了不少太平洋島國的最大貿易伙伴及債主,但在戰略層面,它們依然屬於澳洲新西蘭的勢力範圍,而澳紐背後的就是美國。在北京眼中,美國拉攏這些小國不但與奧巴馬宣布「重返亞太」一脈相承,甚至可能是美國慫恿日菲越南等國與中國對着幹的同類把戲。過去10年,北京花了不少資源在這地區,相反華府的援助則口惠而實不至,假如這些島國像菲律賓那樣,一方面要中國的錢,另一方面要美國的保護,自然不是北京所樂見。而且中國進入南太平洋時,並非從美國勢力硬搶過來,希拉里後發先至,北京也認為是破壞了中美在上個10年建立的默契。

南北太平洋與中美勢力範圍

過去數十年,庫克群島所在的南太平洋,一直是美國忽視的。在太平洋島國中,美國重視的都位於北太平洋,那裏有美國的屬島關島、位於北馬里亞納聯邦的塞班島,也有與美國簽訂「自由聯合協定」、形同美國附庸、但在聯合國有投票權的馬紹爾群島、密克羅尼西亞聯邦和帛琉等國。這個區域,對監控區域主要對手有直接的戰略軍事價值,二戰時對日本就是必爭之地,現在對手改為中國,同樣合用。中國若拉攏這些島國,美國是會警惕的。

南太平洋原來被視為世外桃源,從未發生重大戰爭,並非美國戰略目標,連援助也懶得理會。不過由於太平洋島國曾是兩岸爭奪外交承認的戰場,中國對當地一直關注,到了1990年代,由於美國的忽視、澳洲鞭長莫及,中國勢力在南太平洋卻愈來愈大。例如在湯加王國,中國除了給予巨額援助,也控制了當地主要經濟命脈,並與幾乎控制全國企業的湯加公主建立了特殊關係,甚至捲進了近10年湯加王室的宮廷鬥爭(順帶一提,湯加國王月前正是在香港病逝)。假如這趨勢持續、中美兩國分別在南北太平洋建立勢力範圍,美國的亞太後院就面臨失守,這是美國保守派不能接受的。


島國的全球化危與機

美國國務卿希拉里訪問太平洋迷你島國庫克群島,除了昨天談及的短期價值,還有更值得留意的長期戰略:數十年後,誰保證這些小島沒有更大的潛能?

島國大洋的資源潛能la

像庫克群島的陸地面積雖然只有240平方公里,不及香港總面積1/4,它的專屬經濟區卻極大,達180萬平方公里,相等於法國陸地面積3倍。地球最後能發掘的天然資源,就是在這類杳無人煙的地區,例如北極因為溫室效應,冰川融化,正成為大國最新爭奪資源的中心。

至於太平洋海底能否發掘出有價值資源,這問題卻是過慮的:正如經濟學者Julian Simon所言,歷史證明了只要科技持續發展、人類保持創造力,就能一直發現新的能源;從前被認為難以開採的能源,隨着發展,開採成本也愈來愈低。從過去十多年各地新開發的能源、新發現的油田可見,這觀察基本上符合事實。雖然太平洋小島目前並不富有,但只要有外來資本為其發展勘探,頗有點石成金的潛能。南太平洋的豐富地下資源,已被中國鎖定為戰略目標,詳情可見中國地質調查局的《南太平洋島國海底礦產資源現狀及合作環境研究》,其中就把庫克群島水域劃為「多金屬結核成礦遠景區」。

華人改變島國人口結構

值得大國動腦筋的還有另一組事實:這些島國人口一律極少,像庫克群島只有2萬人,另一位置更偏僻的、同樣與新西蘭簽署「自由聯合協定」的紐埃島更只有1400人,就是我們較熟悉的湯加王國,總人口也不過10萬。相對於中國的13億人,完全不能相提並論。只要少數中國人移民當地,毋須任何部署,已可能帶來人口結構的根本改變。

這情况確實正在發生:像湯加王國原本與台北建交,後來國王不滿台灣搞民主化、公主又變成中國生意伙伴,就改與北京建交,自此湯加的華人數目就由原來的數十,數年內暴增至近4000,佔全國總人口3%至4%,還控制着經濟命脈,也一如所料引起了排華風潮。有時華人數目並不能完全以數字衡量,例如在薩摩亞,全國1/4人口有華裔血統,不過他們在人口普查都登記為薩摩亞人。即使中國沒有任何國家行為,這樣的趨勢有什麼結果,也不難想像。像南太平洋斐濟近年政局動盪,與英國在殖民時代大量引入印度人息息相關,現在印度裔已佔斐濟人口40%,成了政壇一股重要力量,只是印度不像中國,沒有長遠的僑民政策,才沒觸及國際戰略層面的問題而已。

夏威夷模式對北京的啟示

回想19世紀時,夏威夷原來是獨立的太平洋王國,總人口也只有10萬人,美國如何對其吞併,歷史課本記載得很詳細。當然,當代大國很難重複這段歷史,強調和平崛起的中國也不願吞併其他國家,但假如中國未來國力更強,在上述的人口結構下,將一些華人佔重要比例的太平洋島國變成附庸,並非不可能。

美國容許北太平洋的馬紹爾群島等三國簽署「自由聯合協議」、鼓勵其爭取國際社會的獨立身分,正是要將其變成附庸,例如把沒有國家願意接收的拘留者(不少是疑似恐怖分子)送往當地監獄;英國不少偏遠殖民地的主要價值,則是作為離岸避稅天堂。假如中國只是為可能出現的太平洋附庸國賦予同一功能,也許尚不足以刺激美國。

但假如這些國家再成為中國的資訊科技基地(目前中國和湯加公主的主要業務,就包括公主的衛星通訊生意),甚或軍事基地(中國早前擬在冰島購地,就因為被西方懷疑用作北極基地而告吹),這對美國的國防部署,卻足以產生結構性影響。防微杜漸,中美對庫克群島也要爭奪,也就不足為奇。

http://commentshk.blogspot.com/2012/09/blog-post_3984.html
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Topics

Poland: Meloni in the White House. Has Trump Forgotten Poland?*

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats

Mauritius: Could Trump Be Leading the World into Recession?

India: World in Flux: India Must See Bigger Trade Picture

Palestine: US vs. Ansarallah: Will Trump Launch a Ground War in Yemen for Israel?

Ukraine: Trump Faces Uneasy Choices on Russia’s War as His ‘Compromise Strategy’ Is Failing

Related Articles

Hong Kong: Can US Tariffs Targeting Hong Kong’s ‘Very Survival’ Really Choke the Life out of It?

Hong Kong: What Makes US Trade War More Dangerous than 2008 Crisis: Trump

Hong Kong: China, Japan, South Korea Pave Way for Summit Talks; Liu Teng-Chung: Responding to Trump

Hong Kong: With Friends Like Trump’s America, Who Needs Enemies?

Hong Kong: A ‘Toxic Masculinity’ Explanation of Donald Trump’s Foreign Policy