Romney and the (Few) Ways That Could Lead Him to the White House

Published in La Stampa
(Italy) on 15 October 2012
by Alberto Simoni (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Agatha Aissa-Dallongeville. Edited by Tom Proctor.
Could Romney win the presidential election without the Ohio votes? Is gaining in Nevada, Iowa and Colorado enough to make up for Ohio? Here is a model showing how the Republican candidate could be elected President of the U.S. However, the way it goes is anything but straightforward.

Is the road to the White House really blocked for Mitt Romney if he doesn’t get [enough] votes in Ohio? If so, what could be the alternative for the Republican candidate? First of all, let’s have a look at the facts before thinking about the field options.

1) Romney’s good performance during the TV debate in Denver guaranteed him the approval of the Americans, an increased popularity from the electors and undoubtedly major support. The polls measured these mood swings and assured that his lagging behind Obama — be it on the national scale or in the nine key states — narrowed so much so that the race was either close to zero or even swung in his favor. And yet, as a very detailed survey published by the Washington Post put it, Obama still leads (49 percent to 46 percent) among likely voters, and not even one voter out of eight would be willing to change their candidate during the race. In Ohio, Romney is about 5 percent behind Obama.

2) Two-thirds of Americans have already voted. The exit polls conducted on these voters give a clear advantage to Obama (59 percent).

3) The demographic changes between 2008 and 2011 ([as seen in] data from the 2011 census) show that red states will have more electors than the traditionally blue ones. For example, Texas has gone from 34 to 38 electoral votes, and New York and Ohio (here we go again) both lost two, going down respectively from 31 to 29 and from 20 to 18. Obama in 2008 got 365 electoral votes; winning the same states today, he would get 358 votes. The Republican ticket would go from 173 to 180. These are minor differences, but in a case of a neck and neck [race], these differences could become important, if not decisive.

So Romney’s strategists have prepared a model of an electoral map that doesn’t include Ohio. But only a few people really believe that a win without the Buckeye State could be possible, as proven by the debates and rallies both Ryan and Romney had these last days in this state. In order to “substitute” Ohio’s 18 electoral votes, the Republican candidate would need to snatch Iowa (7 votes), Nevada (6 votes) and Colorado (9 votes) from Obama. What remains fundamental (see what happened in 2000) is the conquest of the Florida’s 29 electoral votes. (Let’s take for granted the victory of North Carolina’s 15 votes and possibly Virginia’s 13 electoral votes, even though they’re still neck and neck there.) Where would all that lead Romney if he were to snatch six key states from Obama? He would have exactly 269 votes: parity. In order to shatter this balance, New Hampshire’s 4 votes would suffice. (The rivals are de facto neck and neck there, despite the ARG survey that credits it to the conservatives.) That way, Romney could become president without Ohio. It would be the very first time a Republican entered the Oval Office without the Buckeye State’s electors. But how realistic is this road? For sure, it is not impossible, but certainly difficult. That’s mainly for two reasons.

1) In the model, Romney’s success in several parts of the country where he’s progressing but constantly behind Obama by a hair’s breadth is taken for granted. For example, in Nevada, two-thirds of the pivotal Hispanic electorate is for Barack Obama.

2) The scenario provides a direct route without any obstacles or problems. And there is no plan B. If he doesn’t get one of these states, even the “tiny” ones like Nevada or Iowa, it will jeopardize everything. And in several key states, Romney doesn’t have reassuring advantages that would allow him not to compete or invest time and resource i.e. money destined for other challenges. From today until Nov. 6, Romney must get committed to almost every open front. (Perhaps only North Carolina and Indiana are certain to end in the red states’ box.)

In conclusion, Romney’s TV performance in Denver refreshed his image, but it hasn’t solved his problems on the electoral map. Of course, if Romney were to win Ohio, it would be another story, as history has taught us.


La simulazione che consentirebbe a Romney di vincere

Può vincere senza i voti dell'Ohio? E ancora, basta conquistare Nevada e Iowa e Colorado per fare a meno dell’Ohio? Ecco una simulazione di come potrebbe il repubblicano arrivare alla presidenza. Ma il cammino è tutt’altro che un’autostrada.

Davvero senza vincere in Ohio la strada verso la Casa Bianca per Mitt Romney è sbarrata? E ancora, quale potrebbe essere l’alternativa pr il candidato repubblicano? I dati innanzitutto prima di procedere a vagliare le ipotesi sul campo.

1) La buona performance del repubblicano nel primo dibattito tv a Denver gli ha garantito il plauso degli americani, un’accresciuta simpatia fra gli elettori, e certamente un maggiore supporto. I sondaggi hanno misurato questi umori e certificato che il suo ritardo da Obama - sia a livello nazionale, sia nei 9 Stati chiave, si è ridotto quando non azzerato o addirittura girato a suo favore. Eppure come scrive il «Washington Post» che pubblica un sondaggio molto dettagliato, Obama resta in testa (49 %a 46%) fra i probabili elettori e appena un elettore su otto sarebbe propenso a cambiare candidato in corsa. In Ohio, il ritardo di Romney resta attorno 5%
2) Due terzi degli americani hanno già votato. Gli exit poll condotti su questi elettori danno nettamente in vantaggio Obama, 59%
3) Il cambiamento demografico rispetto al 2008 (dati del censimento del 2011) fa sì che gli Stati “rossi” avranno più grandi elettori rispetto a quelli tradizionalmente Blu. Un esempio: il Texas passa da 34 a 38 voti elettorali, New York e Ohio (e rieccoci) ne perdono due a testa, rispettivamente scendono da 31 a 29 e da 20 a 18. Obama nel 2008 prese 365 voti elettorali, oggi ne avrebbe, vincendo gli stessi Stati, 358. McCain/Romney passerebbe da 173 a 180. Differenze minime ma che in caso di testa a testa potrebbero diventare importanti se non decisive.

Ecco quindi che gli strateghi di Romney hanno preparato una simulazione della mappa elettorale che prescinde dall’Ohio. Quanto poco credano che vincere senza conquistare il Buckeye State sia possibile, lo testimoniano i comizi e i rally che Ryan e Romney stanno tenendo in questi giorni nello Stato.
Per “sostituire” i 18 voti elettorali dell’Ohio, il repubblicano dovrebbe strappare a Obama l’Iowa (7), il Nevada (6) e il Colorado (9). Resta fondamentale (come tradizione dal 2000) la conquista dei 29 voti elettorali della Florida (diamo per quasi fatta la vittoria in North Carolina, 15 voti, e possibile, benché tutta da conquistare, quella in Virginia, 13) quella. A quanto arriverebbe Romney se facesse filotto strappando sei Stati chiave a Obama? Esattamente a 269. Parità. Per scardinare l’equilibrio, basterebbero i 4 voti del New Hampshire (i rivali sono di fatto in parità anche se una rilevazione Arg lo attribuisce al conservatore). Romney così potrebbe essere presidente senza l’Ohio, una prima volta assoluta per un repubblicano varcare lo Studio Ovale senza i grandi elettori del Buckeye State.
Ma quanto è realistico questo cammino? Sicuramente non impossibile ma difficile certamente. Essenzialmente per due motivi:
1) Nella simulazione si dà per acquisito il successo in alcune zone dove Romney è in crescita ma costantemente dietro seppur di un soffio a Obama. Come in Nevada, dove fra l’altro l’elettorato ispanico - fondamentale - è schierato per i due terzi con il presidente.
2) Lo scenario prevede un percorso netto, nessun intoppo o problema. E soprattutto non ha un piano B. Se si perde solo uno di questi Stati, anche “minuscolo”, lo stesso Nevada, o l’Iowa, tutto salta. E in diversi Stati chiave Romney non ha vantaggi rassicuranti che gli consentano di non fare campagna elettorale, di non investire tempo e risorse - soldi - da destinare ad altre sfide in bilico. Da oggi al 6 novembre deve impegnarsi su quasi tutti i fronti aperti. (Forse solo la North Carolina e l’Indiana sono “certi” di finire nella casella degli Stati rossi).

Insomma la prestazione in tv a Denver ha rinfrescato l’immagine di Romney ma non risolto i problemi sulla mappa elettorale. Certo se vincesse l’Ohio...Sarebbe tutt’altra cosa. Come insegna la storia.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Topics

Poland: Meloni in the White House. Has Trump Forgotten Poland?*

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats

Mauritius: Could Trump Be Leading the World into Recession?

India: World in Flux: India Must See Bigger Trade Picture

Palestine: US vs. Ansarallah: Will Trump Launch a Ground War in Yemen for Israel?

Ukraine: Trump Faces Uneasy Choices on Russia’s War as His ‘Compromise Strategy’ Is Failing

Related Articles

Italy : How To Respond to Trump’s Tariffs without Disturbing Beijing

Italy: How To Respond to the (Stupid) Tariff War

Italy: Putin’s Sly Ability To ‘Dupe’ American Presidents