In 2008, Barack Obama was the candidate of excitement and hope. In 2012, his victory was greeted with a huge sigh of relief. In these past four years, the promises Obama made through his rhetoric have measured up against the inertia of reality, and they haven’t always come out on top.
Those who expected to see the U.S. spearhead a technology and energy revolution against climate change were disappointed. America is ever more dependent on fossil fuels. Guantanamo’s doors remain open. The healthcare program (“Obamacare”) is a shadow of what had been designed, and it doesn’t seem to please the majority of citizens. International regulation of the financial sector, whose excesses have led to the global crisis we find ourselves in, is still in the drawing stages. …
However, Obama wasn’t mistaken about how to fight the crisis. Unlike the ideological austerity fever that ails Europe, he knows that the government should promote anti-cyclical policies, counteracting the private sector’s incapability to invest and the risk of tearing the economic fabric. He also knows that the U.S. will be all the stronger for understanding its own limits and using diplomacy wisely to achieve common goals, consolidate alliances and turn enemies into cooperative adversaries. With the Obama of 2012, there won’t be the political redemption that some had hoped for in 2008.
But with Obama, the world will be better shielded against the risk of a swift economic meltdown and further from a new bellicose adventure with unforeseen consequences.
Em 2008, Barack Obama foi o candidato do entusiasmo e da esperança. Em 2012 a sua vitória foi recebida apenas com um enorme suspiro de alívio. Em quatro anos Obama mediu as promessas da sua retórica com as inércias da realidade, e nem sempre levou a melhor.
A expectativa de ver os EUA a liderarem uma revolução tecnológica e energética para combater as alterações climáticas goraram-se. A América depende cada vez mais das energias fósseis. Guantánamo continua aberto. O programa de saúde ("Obamacare") é hoje uma sombra do que foi desenhado e parece não agradar à maioria dos cidadãos. A regulação internacional do sector financeiro, cuja desmesura levou à crise global em que mergulhámos, continua por fazer...
Contudo, Obama não se enganou no combate à crise. Ao contrário, da febre ideológica da austeridade que domina a Europa, ele sabe que o Governo deve promover políticas anticíclicas, contrariando a incapacidade de investimento do sector privado e o risco de desagregação em cadeia do tecido económico. Ele sabe, também, que os EUA serão tanto mais fortes quanto melhor compreenderem os seus limites e mais sabiamente souberem usar a diplomacia para atingirem objetivos que permitem ganhos mútuos, consolidando alianças, e transformando inimigos em adversários cooperantes. Com o Obama de 2012 não haverá a redenção política que alguns esperaram em 2008. Mas, com Obama o mundo estará mais protegido contra risco de um rápido meltdown económico e mais distante de uma nova aventura bélica de consequências imprevisíveis.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link
.
[I]n the same area where these great beasts live, someone had the primitive and perverse idea to build a prison ... for immigrants in the United States without documentation.
In an election that is shaping up to be a fierce contest, 1% or 2% of the vote in the most critical battleground states can make all the difference between winning and losing[.]