When Will the US Export Natural Gas?

Published in Caixin
(China) on 3 April 2014
by Juan Hou (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Jingwei Qian. Edited by Bora Mici.
The United States has abundant natural gas reserves. The expanding overseas market could bring the it considerable profits. But, with cumbersome approval processes, obstructions from lobbyists, and up to four years of "construction to operation" time of terminals, perhaps exporting American natural gas cannot quench the thirst of European countries facing an energy crisis.

As Ukraine tensions escalate, there is more clamor for U.S. natural gas export. Poland, Hungary, the Czech Republic and Slovakia even urge the U.S. Congress to ease the export limit, allowing them to purchase U.S. natural gas. Will U.S. natural gas exports truly solve the energy crisis of those crying for food?

Abundant Reserves, Competence in Export

Data shows that the U.S. has abundant natural gas reserves. According to the U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. shale resources have been verified at 269.3 trillion cubic feet, with U.S. natural gas resources totaling 1,795.5 trillion cubic feet. With the development of shale gas, the U.S. beat Russia in 2012, becoming the country with the largest reserves and production of natural gas.

The booming shale gas releases abundant natural gas resources. The U.S. had only 2,900 shale gas wells in 2004, and that number rose to 98,590 in 2009. More than 10,000 shale oil and gas wells were newly built during 2011 and 2012. U.S. shale gas production accounted for 20 percent of total natural gas production in 2010, and the percentage increased to 40 percent in 2013.

Apart from abundant reserves, the production of natural gas surges every year. The Energy Information Administration released the 2013 U.S. natural gas market report, indicating that the average daily production in 2013 increased to 66.5 billion cubic feet, from 65.07 billion cubic feet in 2012.

President Obama said "the United States is likely to be a net natural gas exporter as soon as 2020" when he visited Costa Rica.

Considerable Profits, Motivation for Export

Despite a slight increase in the retail prices of American natural gas in 2013, the U.S. price has great advantages over the global natural gas market.

According to Reuters, the current natural gas price in Europe is double the U.S. price — $4.4/mmBtu — and the price in Asia is triple the U.S. price. The consulting firm RBN Energy said that the U.S. had great potential to replace most Russian natural gas export.

Surging demand in the Asian market externally stimulated U.S. natural gas export by a large scale. Jiahan Cao, associate researcher at the Shanghai Institutes for International Studies, said that China, Japan, Korea, and other traditional or potential natural gas consumers in Asia were all showing great interest in American natural gas export. By this action, these countries hope to achieve diversified sources of natural gas, and that could be used as a bargaining chip when they negotiate prices with general suppliers.

In fact, the U.S. has sped up natural gas exports. According to Caijing.com, up to now, American supervisors have approved exports of 9 billion cubic feet, with an additional 24 billion cubic feet waiting in line.

One week ago, information from Platts showed that the U.S. Department of Energy approved the first liquefied natural gas export terminal on the West Coast – the Jordan Cove Energy Project at Coos Bay, Oregon. This was the seventh LNG export terminal approved by the U.S. Department of Energy, which would increase the scale of American LNG export to 9.27 billion cubic feet per day.

Cumbersome Approvals, Obstruction in Exports

According to the British Financial Times, the U.S. Department of Energy must first approve the construction of LNG export facilities. Then, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission will review the environmental and safety concerns of the proposed facilities. FERC will then approve the facilities meeting requirements. It is reported that the Obama administration has been striving for the approval of natural gas export plans since 2013, but FERC has not granted approval so far.

The U.S. exports natural gas to both free trade and non-free trade partners. According to the U.S. Natural Gas Act revised in 1992, the 20 free trade partners, including Canada, Australia, Singapore and Korea, can import natural gas from the U.S. through simple and fast approval processes. Before the U.S. exports natural gas to them, non-free trade partners must pass a strict U.S. Energy Department "public interest review," which gives estimates on various aspects of energy in the United States, including safety, economics, trading, consumers, industry and environment.

There are quite a few voices against natural gas export in the United States. The manufacturing industries, which rely on natural gas and electricity, are worried that exporting natural gas would change its price, and thus enterprises would be less competitive in the global market. Environmentalists think that exporting natural gas goes against current environmental policies. Residents also cast doubt on exporting natural gas, for it may increase domestic retail prices.

Furthermore, the construction of natural gas export terminals cannot be accomplished overnight. Generally, it is estimated to take more than one year and cost no less than $100 million to find an appropriate construction site. It would cost at least $7 billion to complete an LNG export terminal, and it would take at least four years from beginning to operation. The Financial Times reported that the first natural gas export terminal in the U.S. would not be put into operation until the second half of 2015.

With cumbersome approval processes, obstructions from lobbyists, and up to four years of "construction to operation" time for terminals, perhaps, exporting American natural gas cannot quench the thirst of European countries facing an energy crisis.


美国天然气储量丰富,国外市场广大,利润可观。但繁复的审批过程、反对人士的阻扰、长达四年的终端“建设—投产”时间让美国天然气出口依然难解能源危机国的近渴。


  随着乌克兰局势持续发酵,呼吁美国天然气出口的声音日渐高涨,波兰、匈牙利、捷克和斯洛伐克甚至敦促美国国会放松出口限制,助其购买美国天然气。美国天然气出口真的能解决“嗷嗷待哺”者的能源危机吗?

  储量丰富,出口有能力

  美国天然气储量丰富已有数据证实,根据美国能源部(Department of Energy)资料显示,美国已探明天然气储量达1759.5万亿立方英尺,其中页岩气储量达269.3万英尺。早在2012年,页岩气已助力美国超越俄罗斯,成为全球第一大天燃气资源国与生产国。

  页岩气的高歌猛进释放了大量天然气资源,2004年,美国页岩气井仅有2900口,2009年,这一数量上涨到98590口,2011年和2012年,新建页岩油气井均超过1万口。2013年,美国页岩气产量占天然气总产量的比重从2010年的20%提高至40%。

  储量丰富的同时,产量也在逐年攀升。据美国能源信息署(EIA)发布的2013年美国天然气市场报告显示,2013年日均产量已从2012年的650.7亿立方英尺增长至665亿立方英尺。

  此前,美国总统奥巴马在出访哥斯达黎加时称“美国到2020年有可能成为天然气净出口国。”

  利润可观,出口有动力

  尽管2013年美国境内天然气零售价有所上涨,但从全球天然气市场来看,美国天然气价格依然优势明显。

  据路透社消息,欧洲目前的天然气价格约为美国(4.4美元/百万英热单位)的两倍,亚洲天然气价格为美国的三倍。咨询公司RBN Energy称,美国很有潜力取代俄罗斯天然气出口的大部分供应。

  亚洲市场需求增长旺盛为美国天然气大量出口提供了外部动力。上海国际问题研究所助理研究员曹嘉涵撰文称,中、日、韩以及亚洲天然气的传统消费国或潜在消费国对美国天然气液化出口充满兴趣,希望借此实现天然气进口来源的多元化,并使之成为与传统供应国进行价格谈判的制衡筹码。

  事实上,美国已加快了天然气出口步伐。据财经网报道,截至目前,美国监管者已经批准了90亿立方英尺的出口量,另外240亿正在等待绿灯。

  一周之前,普氏能源资讯消息称美国能源部批准了首个西海岸液化天然气(LNG)出口基地——位于美国俄勒冈州库斯湾(Coos Bay)的Jordan Cove Energy Project,这是美国能源部批准的第7个LNG出口基地,将使美国LNG出口规模高达9.27 Bcf/d(十亿立方英尺/天)。

  审批繁琐,出口遇阻碍

  据英国《金融时报》报道,LNG出口工厂的建立首先需要获得美国能源部的批准,此后联邦能源管理委员会(FERC)将对拟建工厂进行环境、安全等进行审核,确保合规后,FERC才会予以批准。据悉,奥巴马政府2013年努力争取出口天然气计划获批,但FERC目前仍未给予批准。

  美国天然气出口对象包括自由贸易伙伴国和非自由贸易伙伴国。据1992年修订的美国《天然气法》,包括加拿大、澳大利亚、新加坡、韩国在内的20个自由贸易伙伴国进口美国天然气可执行简单迅捷的审核路径;对于非自由贸易伙伴国,美国出口天然气时均须通过美国能源部严格的“公众利益审核”(public interest review),评估其对美国能源安全、经济贸易、消费者、产业界、环境等各方面影响。

  美国国内也存在不少反对天然气出口的声音,依赖天然气与电力的制造业担心天然气出口带来的电力价格变化影响企业在全球市场的竞争力;环保人士认为天然气出口有悖于现行环保政策;居民对于天然气出口会导致国内零售价格上涨也并不欢迎……

  此外,天然气出口终端的建设也并非一蹴而就。据估算,寻找合适的建设场址通常需要1年以上时间,相关投入不少于1亿美元,而完成一座LNG出口终端的建设至少需要70亿美元,从开工建设到全面投产则至少需要4年时间。《金融时报》报道称,美国第一个天然气出口终端最早也要在2015年下半年才能开始出口。

  繁复的审批过程、反对人士的阻扰、长达四年的终端“建设—投产”时间让美国天然气出口难解能源危机国的近渴。■
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Topics

Poland: Meloni in the White House. Has Trump Forgotten Poland?*

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats

Mauritius: Could Trump Be Leading the World into Recession?

India: World in Flux: India Must See Bigger Trade Picture

Palestine: US vs. Ansarallah: Will Trump Launch a Ground War in Yemen for Israel?

Ukraine: Trump Faces Uneasy Choices on Russia’s War as His ‘Compromise Strategy’ Is Failing

Related Articles

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Hong Kong: Can US Tariffs Targeting Hong Kong’s ‘Very Survival’ Really Choke the Life out of It?

Cuba: Trump, Panama and the Canal

China: White House Peddling Snake Oil as Medicine

China: Prime Take: How Do Americans View US Tariff Hikes?