Net Neutrality: Internet As Public Service, Historic Vote in US Commission

Published in Il Fatto Quotidiano
(Italy) on 26 February 2015
by Fulvio Sarzana (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Bora Mici. Edited by Kyrstie Lane.
Today, at the last hour, the body that regulates U.S. telecommunications decided on net neutrality.

The proposals of the president, Tom Wheeler, were approved. They ensure the impossibility of bandwidth providers blocking or slowing web traffic alleging reasons tied to the payment of additional sums. The same regulations provide for the reclassification of broadband as a public service, subjecting the service itself to a stricter regulation.

The most controversial part of the Federal Communications Commission's decision reclassifies broadband telecommunications services, landline and mobile, as a communications service for all intents and purposes, with the providers subjected to the same rules as the providers of public utilities in the sense of Title II of the Communications Act. This brings Internet services under the same type of regulatory norms as landline and cellular phone services and omits the possibility for telecommunications operators to give preferential services upon pay.

Based on these rules, web giants do not have to pay additional sums when they occupy bandwidth for their services. Think of the example of Netflix, the famous service of on-demand online streaming, which is accessible via subscription, and is present in all the world (including Cuba), but not in Italy.

The council of the regulatory authority was divided in half between the Democratic commissioners and President Tom Wheeler, who voted in favor, and the Republican councilors who voted against. The final vote was 3 to 2.

Barack Obama himself had spoken in favor of net neutrality through an unprecedented endorsement, while Google, after having adamantly supported the new rules over the last weeks, had expressed perplexity over the new regulations, even [questioning] their utility.


L’organo di regolazione delle comunicazioni statunitensi ha deciso oggi in tarda serata sulla net neutrality.

Le proposte del Presidente Tom Wheeler sono state approvate e prevedono l’impossibilità per i fornitori della banda larga di bloccare o rallentare il traffico web adducendo motivi legati al pagamento di somme aggiuntive. Le stesse norme prevedono la riclassificazione del broadband come servizio pubblico, sottoponendo il servizio stesso ad una normativa più stringente.

La parte più controversa della decisione della Fcc riclassifica i servizi di telecomunicazione a banda larga fissa e mobile come un servizio di telecomunicazioni a tutti gli effetti, con i fornitori assoggettati alle stesse regole dei fornitori di servizi di pubblica utilità ai sensi del titolo II della norma Statunitense del Communications Act. Questo porta i servizi Internet sotto lo stesso tipo di regime normativo previsto da servizi di telefonia fissa e mobile vocale ed esclude la possibilità per gli operatori di Telecomunicazioni di disporre servizi preferenziali a pagamento.

In base a queste regole i giganti del web non dovrebbero pagare somme aggiuntive in caso di occupazione di maggiore banda per i propri servizi. Si pensi ad esempio al caso di Netflix, il famoso servizio di streaming online on demand, accessibile tramite un apposito abbonamento, che è presente in tutto il mondo (Cuba Compresa), ma non in Italia.

Il Consiglio della Autorità di regolazione si è spaccato a metà tra i commissari democratici ed il presidente Tom Wheeler, che hanno votato a favore, ed i Consiglieri Repubblicani che hanno votato contro. E’ finita insomma 3 a 2.

A favore della Net neutrality si era espresso con un endorsement senza precedenti lo stesso Barack Obama, mentre Google, nelle ultime settimane, dopo aver appoggiato con decisione le nuove regole, aveva espresso perplessità sulle nuove norme, pur rimarcandone l’utilità.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Germany: Donald, Musk and the Question of Guilt

Kenya: US’ Unconditional Support of Israel To Blame for Elusive Peace

Saudi Arabia: Is the US Pushing Lebanon Down a Dangerous Road?

Egypt: A New US Model for Military Relations

Austria: Musk Is Seeking Confrontation with Europe. It’s Time To Set Limits for Him

Topics

Germany: Donald, Musk and the Question of Guilt

Belgium: Social Media: Friend or Foe?

Austria: Musk Is Seeking Confrontation with Europe. It’s Time To Set Limits for Him

Poland: Michał Szułdrzyński: The Trump Paradox. His Actions Could Save NATO*

   

China: By Closing Its Doors, Washington Puts Its Own Future at Risk

Germany: Trump, Zelenskyy and Europe: Ukraine Sold Out and Abandoned

Egypt: A New US Model for Military Relations

Saudi Arabia: Is the US Pushing Lebanon Down a Dangerous Road?

Related Articles

Germany: Ruling against Tech Giants: Yes, It Can Lead to Addiction

Germany: Does Trump Secretly Envy Putin?

Italy: Trump Dressed as the Pope on White House Social Media

Italy : How To Respond to Trump’s Tariffs without Disturbing Beijing