American Government Caused Cisco’s Banishment from China

Published in Huanqiu
(China) on 28 February 2015
by Wang Dehua (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Yuzhi Yang. Edited by Helaine Schweitzer.
Recent news reported that China has removed some well-known international information technology brands from its government purchasing list, and added almost 1,000 domestic brands. Western media are lamenting the loss of a big customer and rallying American and European companies to petition their governments to act immediately. They are accusing China of using security concerns as an excuse, and of, in fact, protecting its own tech industry.

No country would develop its economy with a cost to its national security. When the Snowden crisis revealed America’s shocking surveillance program to the entire world, network security became a hot topic. Last year, China formed its network security and informatization leadership team, with President Xi Jinping at the helm; the high-level leadership showed that China is strengthening its network security and elevating it to a national strategic level.*

China’s network security regulations have followed the Western format and included no special provisions. But as early as 2007, when Huawei wanted to acquire the American equipment company 3Com, America became paranoid, and Congress used “national security concerns” as a reason to stop the purchase. Huawei could not expand its business in America in spite of being the world’s largest telecom equipment supplier.

Cisco has undoubtedly been affected the most from being taken off China’s purchasing list. Reuters reported that in 2012, the company had 60 products on the list, but at the end of 2014, there were no Cisco products on the list at all. Cisco has always been the American government’s surveillance helper, so its banishment was the result of its own actions.

Routers and switching equipment are the primary links for the Internet, they are like the traffic police for the online world. The world’s largest maker of these parts is Cisco, who owns more than 50 percent of China’s online network, and transmits 80 percent of the information. American intelligence agencies adding a “backdoor” to Cisco’s primary products is an open secret at the company. How many other backdoors are in Cisco products? It makes one very wary.

Cisco runs the network at sensitive agencies like governments, police and customs; it can transfer and analyze relevant information, and any information can be controlled. Even a physically isolated network can acquire information using wireless means and do so without detection. Cisco products have become a main source for American intel; America has deeply invaded the Chinese network’s central nervous system via Cisco.

The Western media love to pressure the Chinese government, but it’s really slapping its own face. The West always likes to make itself the exception, but guests who disrespect the host are not welcome anywhere. One cannot enjoy the benefits from monopolizing technology, fattening his pockets while eavesdropping and hurting the Chinese people. If we allowed the continued purchase of Western IT equipment, it would be like adding a noose around our neck.

“The cyberworld is sort of the wild, wild West. And to some degree, we're asked to be the sheriff.” Obama described the relationship between the American government and the network world this way during a speech at Stanford University. Used to eavesdropping on other people’s privacy, Obama is trying to turn the Internet into a tool for mighty rule, and America’s IT industry is the sheriff’s lackey.

The Chinese government has always opposed any kind of network attack, especially the attack and secret-stealing by a technically advantageous country. The Chinese online czar Lu Wei has repeatedly emphasized that when foreign network firms enter China, the bottom line is they have to follow Chinese laws. “We cannot allow [a foreign company] to occupy China’s market while also hurting China.” Cisco’s banishment from the Chinese government’s purchasing list is the American government’s fault. It’s a case of lifting a rock only to drop it on one's own feet.

*Editor’s note: Informatization refers to the extent by which a geographical area, an economy or a society is becoming information-based, i.e., an increase in the size of its information labor force.


据媒体报道,中国将一些国际知名企业的IT产品从政府采购清单中剔除,同时增加上千种本土品牌。西方媒体一方面大呼“痛失超大客户”,一方面大肆炒作欧美企业“联名上书”本国政府,“立刻采取措施”向中国施压。同时指责“安全担忧只是一个幌子”,“真正的目的是扶持本土的科技产业”。

  没有哪个国家会以国家安全为代价发展经济。“斯诺登事件”将美国骇人的窃听计划公告于光天化日之下,网络安全成为全球瞩目的话题。去年中国成立网络安全和信息化领导小组,习近平主席任组长,如此高配表明中国正在强化网络安全并将其提升至国家战略。

  中国出台网络安全监管规定,只不过复制西方的做法,照葫芦划瓢,并无什么特别条款。但早在2007年,华为拟收购美国设备公司3Com,触动美国敏感神经,美国国会以“影响美国国家安全”为由阻止。作为全球最大的电信设备供应商,华为无法在美国开展业务。

  美国思科公司无疑是受剔除名录影响最大的企业。路透社说,2012年,该公司有60个产品在中国政府采购中心的名单上,但到2014年底已经没有一个产品上榜。思科一直充当美国政府窃密的帮凶,被剔除中国政府采购名录完全是自作自受。

  路由器和交换机是互联网的主要节点设备,就像网络世界的“交通警察”,全世最大制造商就是思科。思科占有中国互联网超过50%的份额,传递着80%的信息。美国情报部门参与思科核心产品设置“后门”,是思科内部公开的秘密。其生产的留着众多“后门”的产品令人不寒而栗。

  思科承载着政府、公安和海关等敏感部门的网络,可以对相关信息做定向转移和分析,任何信息都被其掌握。即使是物理上完全隔离的网络,也可通过无线的方式,在毫不知觉的情况下获取信息。思科产品已成为美国情报信息的主要来源。美国通过思科,深深地侵入中国互联网中枢神经。

  西方媒体表面上是要给中国政府压力,实际上是在掌各自政府的脸。西方总是喜欢把自己看成特殊的例外。这种不尊重主人家的客人,到哪都是不受欢迎的。决不能一边享受技术垄断带来的好处,赚得盆满钵满,一边监听窃密伤害中国人民。再听之任之采购西方IT设备,那就是自己给自己脖子上套绞索。

  “互联网世界就像当年蛮荒时代的西部,美国政府就应当成为那里的警长。”奥巴马在斯坦福大学演讲时,以此比喻当今的互联网世界和美国政府的关系。习惯偷窥别人隐私的奥巴马,妄图利用技术传势将互联网变成霸权工具,而美国IT企业充当了这名“警长”的走狗。

  中国政府一贯反对任何形式的网络攻击行为,特别是坚决反对靠技术上的优势对别国实施攻击和窃密。中国网络总管鲁炜反复强调,外国互联网企业进入中国,我们的底线就是要符合中国的法律法规,“不能既挣了中国的钱,还来伤害中国”。思科被剔除中国政府采购名录,是美国政府“坑”的,这叫搬起石头砸自已的脚。(王德华)
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Topics

Poland: Meloni in the White House. Has Trump Forgotten Poland?*

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats

Mauritius: Could Trump Be Leading the World into Recession?

India: World in Flux: India Must See Bigger Trade Picture

Palestine: US vs. Ansarallah: Will Trump Launch a Ground War in Yemen for Israel?

Ukraine: Trump Faces Uneasy Choices on Russia’s War as His ‘Compromise Strategy’ Is Failing

Related Articles

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Hong Kong: Can US Tariffs Targeting Hong Kong’s ‘Very Survival’ Really Choke the Life out of It?

Cuba: Trump, Panama and the Canal

China: White House Peddling Snake Oil as Medicine