Bibi and the Bomb

Published in El País
(Spain) on 5 March 2015
by José Ignacio Torreblanca (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Cydney Seigerman. Edited by Nicholas Eckart.
Observers agree that Benjamin Netanyahu gave a brilliant speech on Tuesday, calling out Obama for his intention to make a nuclear agreement with Iran. For some strange reason, all of the newspaper, radio and television reports made the same mistake: labeling Netanyahu as "prime minister of Israel." It is strange that it happened, when it is obvious that the last thing Bibi did was act like the prime minister of an ally country. Surely, the misunderstanding is due to the difficulty of choosing between two alternatives, both more realistic. It is not difficult to imagine news directors at the main television channels debating between whether they should label Netanyahu a Republican congressman in Jerusalem or as Likud's candidate in the general elections to be held in Israel on March 17. That is what Netanyahu did: He used fear toward Iran in order to promote himself as candidate for prime minister and, in passing, weaken Obama in front of the Republicans.

It is a miracle that Netanyahu can scream out against the nuclear agreement with Iran and, at the same time, keep out of public debate and international treaties his own nuclear arsenal, estimated to have 60-80 nuclear warheads and enough fissionable material to build up to 200. It is important to remember that the United States is not Israel's friend, but rather, its main protector. Without Washington's diplomatic protection in the United Nations Security Council, Israel would have had to choose between signing a fair peace agreement with the Palestinians and withdrawing from the West Bank, or resign itself to a series of international sanctions, similar to those experienced by the South Africa of apartheid. Additionally, without the more than $3 billion that American taxpayers (including those who voted for Obama) give to Israel yearly as military support, the Israelis could not maintain their military advantage when facing their neighbors. Without U.S. support, Israel would not be an island of development and democracy in the Middle East, but rather, an isolated encampment in a very unfriendly neighborhood.

Republicans have to be a bit more careful and show a little more common sense. Making Netanyahu think that he owns U.S. international politics is not doing any favor to Israel, nor to the Republican Party: whether because Tehran, feeling threatened, decides to break its nuclear agreement and go for bombs, or because Israel decides to unilaterally bomb the Iranian nuclear facilities, and the new president of the United States does not have the authority to stop them, it is obvious that, if Netanyahu is re-elected and the Republicans win the 2016 elections, the probability of a war with Iran will increase exponentially. Perhaps, the logical choice would be that Netanyahu run in the upcoming Republican primaries and opt for the presidency. That would clear up everything. When the tail wags the dog, things go badly.


Vibrante discurso, coinciden los observadores, el pronunciado el martes en el Congreso de EE UU por Benjamín Netanyahu clamando contra Obama por su intención de concluir un acuerdo nuclear con Irán. Por alguna extraña razón, todas las crónicas de prensa, radio y televisión cometieron el mismo error: rotular a Netanyahu como “primer ministro de Israel”. Extraño proceder cuando es evidente que lo último que hizo Bibi fue actuar como primer ministro de un país aliado. Seguramente el equívoco se debe a lo difícil que fue elegir entre las dos alternativas, ambas más realistas. No es difícil imaginar a los directores de informativos de las principales cadenas de televisión debatiendo entre si debían rotular a Netanyahu como congresista republicano por Jerusalén o como candidato del partido Likud a las elecciones generales que se celebrarán en Israel el día 17. Porque eso es todo lo que hizo Netanyahu: utilizar el miedo a Irán para promocionarse como candidato a primer ministro y, de paso, debilitar a Obama ante los republicanos.

Que Netanyahu pueda bramar contra el acuerdo de nuclear con Irán y, a la vez, mantener fuera del debate público y de los tratados internacionales un arsenal nuclear propio que se estima en 60-80 cabezas nucleares y material fisible para construir hasta 200, es un milagro de orden bíblico solo posible en esa zona del mundo. Hay que recordar que EE UU no es un amigo de Israel, sino su principal valedor. Sin el apoyo diplomático de Washington en el Consejo de Seguridad de Naciones Unidas, Israel hace tiempo que habría tenido que elegir entre firmar una paz justa con los palestinos y retirarse de Cisjordania o exponerse a un régimen de sanciones internacionales similares al que sufrió la Sudáfrica del apartheid. Y sin los más de 3.000 millones de dólares anuales que los contribuyentes estadounidenses (votantes de Obama incluidos) transfieren a Israel como ayuda militar, los israelíes no podrían mantener su ventaja militar ante sus vecinos. Sin el apoyo de EE UU, Israel no sería una isla de desarrollo y democracia en Oriente Próximo, sino un cuartel aislado en un vecindario nada amable.

Los republicanos tendrían que tener algo más de cuidado y un poco más de sentido común. Haciendo creer a Netanyahu que es el dueño de la política exterior de EE UU no hacen ningún favor a Israel ni tampoco se lo hacen a sí mismos. Sea porque Teherán, sintiéndose amenazado, decida romper el acuerdo nuclear e ir a por la bomba o sea porque Israel decida unilateralmente bombardear las instalaciones nucleares iraníes y el nuevo presidente de EE UU no tenga la autoridad para impedírselo, es evidente que si Netanyahu es reelegido y los republicanos ganan las elecciones presidenciales de 2016, las probabilidades de una guerra con Irán aumentarán de forma exponencial. Quizá lo lógico sería que Netanyahu se presentara a las próximas primarias republicanas y optara a la Presidencia; eso lo aclararía todo. Cuando la cola mueve al perro, las cosas andan mal.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Afghanistan: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Israel: Trump’s National Security Adviser Forgot To Leave Personal Agenda at Home and Fell

Russia: Political Analyst Reveals the Real Reason behind US Tariffs*

Topics

Israel: Trump’s National Security Adviser Forgot To Leave Personal Agenda at Home and Fell

Afghanistan: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Russia: Political Analyst Reveals the Real Reason behind US Tariffs*

Poland: Meloni in the White House. Has Trump Forgotten Poland?*

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats

Related Articles

Pakistan: Much Hinges on Iran-US Talks

Austria: Netanyahu’s Worst Moment in the White House

Turkey: Predecessors’ Fate Looms over Trump’s Dangerous Path

Israel: Trump’s Friendship with Israel Is a Double-Edged Sword

Canada: Resistance to Trump Is Getting Organized