I remember the U.S. invasion of Panama in 1989 well. I had barely left behind adolescence when, on the morning of Dec. 20, U.S. troops bombarded Panamanian airports and military bases. The pain I felt was deep and visceral.
Civilian buildings were reached by “intelligent” weapons used by 26,000 soldiers from the 82nd Airborne Division of the most powerful army in the world, as they faced 12,000 poorly equipped soldiers of the Defense Forces of the isthmus that used to be part of Colombia. El Chorrillo, a poor neighborhood, suffered the worst of the violence. Is this more admissible than forcing apart the rich from their riches? The radio was transmitting live the progress of "Operation Just Cause," as it was named by a commander keen to hide with words the truth of their actions.
Just cause? Antonio Noriega was an indefensible person. He was a dictator and a drug trafficker. He was also about “defending democracy and human rights,” as then-president George Bush, Sr. said.
It’s just that Noriega was a close collaborator of a certain intelligence agency directed by the same Bush, Sr. There is a photo circulating on the Internet. In it we see a cheerful Noriega sitting on a sofa next to a very friendly looking Vice President Bush. Noriega was on the CIA’s payroll until February 1988. What must these colleagues have talked about? Maybe about the era in which Noriega allowed the U.S. to use Panama so that the Medellin cartel’s money could buy Iranian weapons, which would end up in the hands of the Nicaraguan Contra, when President Ronald Reagan was defending their just cause. Before Reagan, there were Kissinger and Nixon, who could not “stand by and watch a country go communist because of the irresponsibility of its own people.” Nixon gave rise to Reagan who gave rise to the first Bush who gave rise to the second Bush, whose administration supported the 2002 coup against Hugo Chavez.
After all of these men comes Obama, who has declared the United States in a state of “national emergency” because of the threat of the Socialist government in Venezuela, an act that is just as meaningless as banning the term “climate change” in the state of Florida, as the third Bush, the next presidential candidate, has done. Just like them, Obama has invoked democracy and human rights. And just like in the past, our vanguard intellectuals will say that it would be an exaggeration to speak of a coup: The Venezuelan government was asking for it by imprisoning its opposition, threatening personal property and opinion, and financing Podemos. All of this explains or justifies the declaration. In the end, it is the Venezuelan people’s irresponsibility that is to blame for having elected a Communist.
Recuerdo bien la invasión estadounidense a Panamá en 1989. Apenas abandonaba la adolescencia cuando en la madrugada de diciembre 20 tropas norteamericanas bombardearon los aeropuertos y bases militares panameñas. Sentí un dolor profundo, visceral.
Edificios civiles alcanzados por el armamento “inteligente” con el cual el más poderoso ejército de la Tierra, 26.000 soldados de la 82ª División Aerotransportada, enfrentaba a 12.000 mal equipadas Fuerzas de Defensa del istmo que antes había sido Colombia. El empobrecido barrio El Chorrillo sufrió la peor violencia. ¿Es ésta más admisible que forzar a los ricos separarse de sus riquezas? La radio transmitía en directo el desarrollo de la Operación Justa Causa, así denominada por un comando militar afecto a derrotar en el lenguaje la verdad de sus actos.
¿Justa causa? Antonio Noriega era un personaje indefendible. Dictador, narcotraficante. Se trataba además de “defender la democracia y los derechos humanos”, como dijo el entonces presidente George Bush Sr.
Sólo que el mismo Noriega había sido un cercano colaborador de la agencia de inteligencia dirigida por el mismo Bush. En Internet circula una foto. Puede verse a un muy jovial Noriega en un sofá junto a un muy amistoso vicepresidente Bush. Noriega estuvo en la paga de la CIA hasta febrero de 1988. ¿De qué hablarían estos colegas? Quizás de la época en que Noriega permitió a los EE.UU. usar a Panamá para que los dineros del Cartel de Medellín compraran armas iraníes que culminarían en manos de la Contra nicaragüense, cuando el presidente Ronald Reagan defendía su justa causa. Antes de Reagan fueron Kissinger y Nixon, quienes no podían “hacerse a un lado porque un pueblo irresponsable ha elegido a un comunista”. Nixon engendró a Reagan quien engendró al primer Bush quien engendró al segundo Bush, cuya administración apoyó el golpe del 2002 contra Hugo Chávez.
A todos ellos les sigue Obama, tras declarar a EE.UU. en “emergencia nacional” por la amenaza del gobierno socialista elegido en Venezuela. Algo tan carente de sentido como prohibir el término “cambio climático” en el estado de Florida, lo que parece hicieron el tercer Bush, próximo candidato presidencial, y sus sucesores. Como aquellos, Obama también ha invocado la democracia y los derechos. Y como en el pasado, nuestros intelectuales de vanguardia dirán que es exagerado hablar de golpe: el gobierno venezolano se lo buscó por apresar opositores, atentar contra la propiedad o la opinión, y financiar a Podemos. Ello explica o justifica la declaratoria. En últimas, la culpa es del irresponsable pueblo venezolano por haber elegido a un comunista.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link
.
These costly U.S. attacks failed to achieve their goals, but were conducted in order to inflict a blow against Yemen, for daring to challenge the Israelis.