The EU, NATO and Russia: Erdogan’s Show of Force

Published in Público
(Portugal) on 8 August 2016
by Sofia Lorena (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Conor Lane. Edited by Matthew Boyer.
The Austrian chancellor says he will block the opening of new chapters on the issue of Turkish accession to the European Union. Berlin insists “coup plotters be punished within the rule of law.” Turkish head of state is en route to Russia.

The expected came to pass: A massive Turkish demonstration, throughout the afternoon and evening, made up of members of the ruling Justice and Development Party, or AKP, and non-Kurdish opposition—three million participants, according to pro-government news outlets, or, as others have it, more than one million—joined together at a mass “Democracy and Martyrs” rally in Istanbul. With the Turkish people at his feet and the crowds united under the same banner, Recep Tayyip Erdogan seized the moment to repeat “if the Turkish public want the death penalty... then political parties will follow their will.”

His rhetoric is expected to go no further than this, initially. For the moment, at least, the Turkish president is riding the wave of nationalism rippling throughout the entire country. This wave, he hopes, will both spread and strengthen. Whenever he can, Erdogan now speaks of reinstating the death penalty in order to hang those suspected of involvement in the attempted coup d’état that took place on July 15. Yet, while justice may be coming under fire in Turkey, coup participants can never be condemned to death, as the death penalty was not in force at the time of the crime.

Even as Erdogan rides this post-coup wave, the European Union has reiterated that the death penalty, abolished in 2004, is incompatible with Turkey’s aim to accede to the EU. This ascension process, it should be remembered, had been dying until Brussels decided it needed Ankara to slow down the flow of millions of refugees arriving along the Greek Coast and to take back millions already in Greece. Austrian Chancellor Christian Kern said on Monday that Turkey “is moving away from Europe,” adding that “what is happening there is not compatible with European fundamental values.”

“I have a seat and a vote in the (EU) foreign ministers’ council. There the question is whether new negotiation chapters will be opened with Turkey, and I am against it,” said Kern.

Hours after the massive rally in Istanbul on Sunday, other European leaders commented on President Erdogan’s pronouncements, someone who is also the ex-Turkish prime minister and strongman of the AKP, the Justice and Development Party, in power since 2002. Following a visit to the parliament in Ankara, which had been bombed by coup plotters, Markus Ederer, the secretary of state to the German Federal Ministry for European Affairs in Berlin, insisted that “coup plotters be punished within the rule of law.” Sunday’s rally, it should also be mentioned, should have marked the end of appeals by Erdogan to mobilize the public, following three weeks of demonstrations, but no—Erdogan is hoping for yet another such climatic event to occur on Wednesday.

Meanwhile, in Berlin, where many of the loudest voices critical of Erdogan’s post-coup reaction have emerged, Ederer acknowledged, “If this attempt had been successful, that would have been a disaster for Turkey, Germany and the region.” Erdogan, it is interesting to note, had been banned from addressing a Turkish demonstration via video in Cologne on Aug. 1. Ederer elaborated further that what is essential “is that criminal investigations be conducted in accordance with European Union, Council of Europe and OSCE [Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe] standards.”

The Turkish people, the party in power, the opposition, analysts and academics are pointing their finger at the movement associated with Imam Fethullah Gülen, a moderate preacher living in the United States that was an important ally to AKP during the years when the party was consolidating its power. In the time since the failed coup, 60,000 Turkish have been removed from public office, including bureaucrats, doctors, judges and professors, for alleged sympathies toward Gülen. More than 10,000 people have also been detained, including dozens of journalists, who face severe allegations.

Organizations like Amnesty International, meanwhile, have remained resolute that detainees are being subjected to torture and are being left in want of food and drink. Many detainees don’t even know what they have been accused of until they arrive at their tribunal, which can last 30 days, according to the declared state of emergency. Almost none are able to elect legal counsel of their own choosing, as access to defense is being limited. Calculations made, Erdogan and the AKP have seized upon the chance to silence remaining critics, while also taking advantage of the nationalistic, warmongering rhetoric, which has been exacerbated by the 239 deaths that occurred on July 15, the majority of whom were civilians that came out to face down the tanks and the military. This has had a polarizing effect on society and has given rise to vigilante groups, which have attacked suspects, suspects’ family members and lawyers, or even, more simply, those that are different.

Making Choices

In the face of this scenario, many within the EU now believe that Turkey should be most certainly excluded from the union. Yet, there are also those who maintain that such blusterous pronouncements, on the part of Erdogan, are merely the product of a fearful authoritarian leader, who had seen that he was about to be ousted from power, and are therefore only temporary.

It doesn’t help matters that Gülen is currently in Pennsylvania or that Brussels has been negotiating over the fate of refugees with Erdogan. The United States will have to choose at some point whether it will extradite the religious leader or risk souring relations even further with its ally, which is considered by Washington to be fundamental in the fight against terrorism, primarily in Syria. Europeans, too, are giving in further in order to ensure that fewer people make their way to Europe via the deadly Aegean Sea crossing.

What is clear is that Erdogan wasted no time in expressing his gratitude to Russia for its swift condemnation of the attempted coup. Nor did he waste time in extending this gratitude directly to Vladimir Putin himself via a telephone call in which the two expressed solidarity. This call comes after months of tense relations since November, when the Turkish military destroyed a Russian combat plane along the Turkish-Syrian border. On Tuesday, his Russian counterpart will receive Erdogan, whose country has the second largest military in NATO, in St. Petersburg.

Erdogan affirms that he will be visiting “a friend” and inaugurating “a new page” in relations between the two countries, which have been habitual rivals in dispute over influence in the Black Sea and in the Middle East. As a sign of Turkish goodwill, even at a time when newspapers are being closed nearly on a daily basis, Ankara unblocked the Russian website Sputnik, which had been censored in April.


Pena de morte, UE, NATO e Rússia, Erdogan em demonstração de força

Sofia Lorena

Chanceler austríaco diz que bloqueará a abertura de novos capítulos no processo de adesão turco. Berlim pede que “os golpistas sejam punidos no quadro do Estado de direito”. Chefe de Estado turco a caminho da Rússia.

Foi o que se esperava, tarde e noite, uma manifestação gigante (três milhões, segundo os jornais pró-Governo; mais de um milhão, dizem os outros) de turcos, o povo do AKP e o da oposição não curda, todos juntos no comício “da democracia e dos mártires”, em Istambul. Recep Tayyip Erdogan com os turcos a seus pés e a multidão embrulhada numa mesma bandeira, a aproveitar para repetir que “se o povo quer a pena de morte, os partidos seguirão a sua vontade”.

Conversa, à partida não será mais do que isso, espera-se. O Presidente turco ajudou à onda, claro, um país inteiro picado pelo mosquito do nacionalismo é o que mais quer, que a onda alastre e dure é o que deseja. Sempre que pode, Erdogan fala na reinstalação da pena de morte para que os suspeitos de envolvimento na tentativa falhada de golpe de Estado de 15 de Julho sejam enforcados. Claro que a Justiça pode estar debaixo de fogo na Turquia, mas os golpistas nunca poderiam ser condenados à morte quando esta não estava em vigor no momento do crime.

Erdogan faz o seu papel, e cavalga o que pode no pós-golpe, a União Europeia faz o seu e repete que a pena de morte (abolida em 2004) não é conciliável com a adesão, um processo que estava moribundo até Bruxelas ter decidido que precisava de Ancara para impedir milhões de refugiados de chegar à costa grega e receber de volta milhares que já estão na Grécia. A Turquia, disse esta segunda-feira o chanceler austríaco, Christian Kern, “está a afastar-se da Europa” e “o que lá se está a passar não é compatível com os valores fundamentais europeus”.

“Eu tenho um lugar no conselho de ministros dos Negócios Estrangeiros, que decide por unanimidade se serão abertos novos capítulos com a Turquia. E eu sou contra”, afirmou Kern.

Horas depois do megacomício de Istambul (que deveria marcar o fim dos apelos à mobilização popular, três semanas de manifestações, mas não, afinal, Erdogan quer mais uma apoteose, na quarta-feira), no domingo, outros líderes europeus comentaram as declarações do Presidente e ex-primeiro-ministro turco, homem forte do AKP (Partido da Justiça e do Desenvolvimento, no poder desde 2002). Depois de uma visita ao Parlamento, em Ancara (bombardeado pelos golpistas), o secretário de Estado dos Assuntos Europeus de Berlim, Markus Ederer, insistiu que “os golpistas sejam punidos no quadro do Estado de direito”.

Mas Berlim, de onde têm chegado algumas das vozes mais críticas face à reacção pós-golpe de Erdogan (que foi proibido de se dirigir por vídeo a uma manifestação de turcos em Colónia, no dia 1 de Agosto), também sabe que “se o golpe tivesse sido bem-sucedido isso teria sido uma catástrofe para a Turquia, a Alemanha e a região”, admite Ederer. Importante, repetiu, “é que as investigações sejam conduzidas de acordo com os critérios da UE, do Conselho da Europa e da OSCE” (Organização para a Segurança e Cooperação), disse o diplomata.

Os turcos, partido no poder, toda a oposição, analistas e académicos, apontam o dedo ao movimento do imã Fethullah Gülen, o pregador moderado que vive nos Estados Unidos e foi um importante aliado do AKP nos anos da consolidação do poder. Desde o golpe fracassado, 60 mil turcos foram demitidos de cargos na função pública (burocratas, médicos, juízes, professores…) por supostas simpatias com os gulenistas. Mais de 10 mil pessoas foram detidas (incluindo dezenas de jornalistas) e enfrentam acusações graves.

Organizações como a Amnistia Internacional não têm dúvidas: os detidos são sujeitos a tortura, passam fome e sede, muitos não sabem do que são acusados até irem a tribunal (o que, segundo o estado de emergência declarado, pode demorar 30 dias), quase nenhuns podem escolher o advogado que desejem e o acesso à defesa está a ser limitado. Contas feitas, Erdogan e o AKP aproveitam para calar os críticos que restavam e a retórica nacionalista e belicista (empolada pelos 239 mortos de 15 de Julho, a maioria civis, que enfrentaram os tanques e os militares) alimenta a polarização social e dá azo ao surgimento de grupos de vigilantes que atacam suspeitos, familiares ou advogados, ou, simplesmente, gente diferente.

Fazer escolhas

Perante este cenário, são muitos os que na UE acreditam que a Turquia pode estar a afastar-se definitivamente. Também há quem defenda que os exageros são fruto do medo de um líder autoritário que se viu prestes a ser derrubado e se limitam a um consumo interno e temporário.

Não ajuda que Gülen esteja na Pensilvânia e que Bruxelas tenha negociado a sorte dos refugiados com Erdogan. Os EUA terão de escolher a certa altura se extraditam o líder religioso ou arriscam azedar ainda mais as relações com um aliado que consideram fundamental no combate ao terrorismo (principalmente na Síria). Os europeus se cedem ainda mais para garantir que há menos gente a chegar aos barcos mortíferos do Egeu.

Certo é que Erdogan não perdeu tempo a agradecer à Rússia a rapidez com que condenou a tentativa de golpe e a Vladimir Putin o telefonema de solidariedade que lhe fez (depois de meses de relações tensas, desde que, em Novembro, militares turcos destruíram um avião de combate russo na fronteira turco-síria). Terça-feira, o Presidente do país com o segundo maior Exército da NATO será recebido pelo homólogo em São Petersburgo.

Erdogan diz que vai visitar “um amigo” e inaugurar “uma nova página” nas relações entre os dois países, habituais rivais na disputa por influência no mar Negro e no Médio Oriente. Sinal de boa vontade turca, num momento em que encerra jornais quase diariamente, Ancara desbloqueou o site de informações russo Sputnik, banido em Abril.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Venezuela: Vietnam: An Outlet for China

Germany: Absolute Arbitrariness

Russia: Political Analyst Reveals the Real Reason behind US Tariffs*

Austria: Donald Trump Revives the Liberals in Canada

Israel: Trump’s National Security Adviser Forgot To Leave Personal Agenda at Home and Fell

Topics

Austria: Donald Trump Revives the Liberals in Canada

Germany: Absolute Arbitrariness

Israel: Trump’s National Security Adviser Forgot To Leave Personal Agenda at Home and Fell

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Venezuela: Vietnam: An Outlet for China

Russia: Political Analyst Reveals the Real Reason behind US Tariffs*

Related Articles

Ukraine: Trump Faces Uneasy Choices on Russia’s War as His ‘Compromise Strategy’ Is Failing

Germany: Trump’s False Impatience

Ukraine: Nearly 100 Days of Trump, and Putin Is Still Calling the Shots

Austria: Netanyahu’s Worst Moment in the White House