We Are the Wall

Published in El País
(Spain) on 5 September 2016
by Valeria Luiselli (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Becky Stoakes. Edited by Alexandra Mullin.
Peña Nieto and Donald Trump met last Thursday in Mexico City as part of the Republican candidate’s inexplicable and untimely visit to this country, which he has gone out of his way to insult. Among other topics, they discussed each nation’s role in tackling the current humanitarian crisis: The thousands of Central American migrants and refugees who are crossing Mexico to get to the United States. The issue is that neither Trump, from whom nobody expects much empathy, nor Peña, from whom nobody expects much sovereignty, seems to realize that this “humanitarian crisis” will not be resolved by stepping up border controls, which will only prevent those people who are seeking political asylum from crossing.

They spoke about the crisis within the same context of arms and illegal drugs trafficking across the Mexico-U.S. border. In this way, they seemed to classify Central American migrants in the category of arms and illegal drugs. The recent wave of migration from Central America to the U.S. is not a wave of “illegal people” — who in fact do not exist — but rather undocumented people who report to the immigration police at the border in order to seek political asylum in the United States.

At their meeting in Mexico, Trump and Peña Nieto both portrayed themselves as allies in the task of tackling this “humanitarian crisis.” The cynicism with which they both repeated this phrase, “humanitarian crisis,” while referring to tackling the wave of emigration rather than the systematic violation of the Central American refugees’ human rights, seemed to go unnoticed. The media, which did have good reasons, concentrated on the offense caused by Trump’s visit. But being preoccupied with our own damaged nationalism, it didn’t occur to us to look further south across the border and think of the message that Mexico is sending to Central America.
The Achilles heel of Mexican governments has always been believing that they are closer to the U.S. and further away from Central America. Intoxicated by the (fleeting) illusion of a “bilateral relationship” with the U.S., they don’t realize that our historic role has always been as a mercenary or the “backyard.” Peña Nieto seemed to indicate last week that our role is to guard the borders so that the Central Americans do not reach Rio Bravo. In Trump’s speech in Arizona a few hours following his visit, he said, “Mexico is going to pay for the wall,” and continued, “They still don’t know it but they are going to pay.” Perhaps he was right, in the same way that sometimes madmen’s words become prophetic. We are going to pay for the wall because we already are the wall.


Ni Trump ni Peña parecen darse cuenta de que la “crisis humanitaria” no se resuelve con mayor control de las fronteras

Entre los temas que Peña Nieto y Donald Trump discutieron el jueves pasado en la Ciudad de México, durante la intempestiva e inexplicable visita del candidato republicano al país que lleva meses injuriando, estuvo el rol de ambas naciones frente a la actual crisis humanitaria de los miles de migrantes y refugiados centroamericanos que cruzan México y llegan a EE UU. La cuestión es que ni Trump (de quien se espera poco en el terreno de la empatía) ni Peña (de quien se espera poco en el de la esfera de la soberanía) parecen darse cuenta de que dicha “crisis humanitaria” no se resuelve con mayor control de las fronteras, impidiendo el paso a gente que está buscando asilo político.

Cuando hablaron de la crisis, lo hicieron en el contexto del trasiego de armas y drogas ilegales a través de la frontera México-EE UU. Así, parecía que colocaban “migrante centroamericano” en la misma categoría que “armas y drogas ilegales”. La reciente oleada de migración centroamericana a EE UU no es una oleada de “ilegales” (de hecho, no existe la gente “ilegal”), sino de personas indocumentadas que se entregan a la migra en la frontera, para pedir asilo político en EE UU.

Trump y Peña Nieto, en su encuentro en México, se mostraron a sí mismos como aliados en la tarea de combatir aquella “crisis humanitaria”. El cinismo con que ambos repitieron las palabras “crisis humanitaria” para referirse no a la violación sistemática de derechos humanos de refugiados centroamericanos, sino a combatir la ola de emigración per se, pasó básicamente inadvertido. Los medios se concentraron —con buenas razones, claro— en la ofensa que había implicado para nosotros la visita de Trump. Pero, chapoteando en el charco de nuestro nacionalismo vulnerado, no se nos ocurrió mirar hacia nuestra frontera al sur y pensar en el mensaje que México le mandaba a Centroamérica.

El talón de Aquiles de los gobernantes de México siempre ha sido pensar que están más cerca de EE UU y más lejos de Centroamérica. Poseídos por la embriagadora (y siempre efímera) ilusión de la “relación bilateral” con EE UU, no detectan a tiempo que el papel histórico que se nos sigue asignando es el de mercenario o el de “patio trasero”. Nuestro papel, pareció indicar Peña Nieto la semana pasada, es custodiar las fronteras para que no lleguen hasta el río Bravo los centroamericanos. En su discurso en Arizona unas horas después de su visita, Trump dijo: “México va a pagar el muro”, y precisó: “Todavía no lo saben, pero van a pagar ellos”. Tal vez tenga razón, a la manera de los locos que luego resultan proféticos. Vamos a pagar el muro porque ya somos el muro.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Topics

Poland: Meloni in the White House. Has Trump Forgotten Poland?*

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats

Mauritius: Could Trump Be Leading the World into Recession?

India: World in Flux: India Must See Bigger Trade Picture

Palestine: US vs. Ansarallah: Will Trump Launch a Ground War in Yemen for Israel?

Ukraine: Trump Faces Uneasy Choices on Russia’s War as His ‘Compromise Strategy’ Is Failing

Related Articles

Poland: Meloni in the White House. Has Trump Forgotten Poland?*

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats

Mauritius: Could Trump Be Leading the World into Recession?

India: World in Flux: India Must See Bigger Trade Picture

Palestine: US vs. Ansarallah: Will Trump Launch a Ground War in Yemen for Israel?