Is it being canceled, or is it being renegotiated? Donald Trump, through his outrageous use of the media and tweets, has created complete uncertainty in the face of the changed relationship between our countries, in which we are being treated with a contempt previously felt, but never before seen like this. Disgracefully, up until now, our government has not responded in a way that shows any sign of firmness or dignity in our defense.
The only thing that is clear and certain is that the big winner in the North American Free Trade Agreement, which Carlos Salinas de Gortari got us into, has been the United States, even though the gringo president maintains the opposite position, and wants even more concessions, against our national interest.*
The unfavorable economic and cultural consequences come into focus in the film industry. Week after week, the 6,400 theaters in Mexico’s 173 cities are saturated with U.S. releases, leaving Mexican audiences without any real options. Day by day, like it or not, they are being informally inculcated with gringo culture. If they try to access alternative types of film or culture when they want to be entertained or informed, they face numerous obstacles and problems.
The schedules, the screens and the movie theaters give priority to U.S. releases. Mexican and world cinema are marginalized, banished and penalized through anti-competitive practices like dumping, reducing choice by increasing market share though saturation, and other unfair practices.
In the face of this, there has been only inaction and silence on the part of the Mexican Department of the Economy, the Federal Economic Competition Commission, and the Federal Consumer Protection Agency, which are responsible for these issues according to regulations, and should be taking action. However, mimicking former President Salinas, who was the force behind signing NAFTA, they neither see nor hear anything, and thus we suffer significant damage in production, with an unhealthy supply chain that puts the Mexican film industry under serious threat and at risk of extinction.
The numbers don’t lie. For 10 years, the gringos have been saturating Mexican movie screens, going from 36,109 copies per year in 2007, with 179 titles, to 181,051 in 2016, with only 190 releases. That is, there was an increase of 401 percent [in the number of copies] in the past decade, while the number of releases only increased by 6 percent. **
This amounted to releasing each U.S. title with an average of 953 copies in 2016. In reality, however, 12 films were released on more than 3,934 screens; that is, 61.4 percent of all movie theaters screened only one title, month after month. Examples of this are “Capitán América” (the Spanish-language version of “Captain America”), which occupied 5,422 screens (84.7 percent) and “Batman y Superman” (the Spanish-language version of “Batman and Superman”), with 4,677 (73 percent).
If we look at films released with more than 1,500 copies, they were screened in 42.2 percent of theaters weekly.
Conversely, Mexican films released last year averaged a paltry 274 copies, and films from the rest of the world, 91 copies per title because of a lack of theaters in which to show them.
The current policy of movie screen invasion that the Motion Picture Association is utilizing to eliminate or minimize competition is a commercial act that prevents the circulation of ideas in the movie theaters, limiting the communication of works of the national and global imagination to the citizens of Mexico. As a result, enrichment from worldwide culture is limited and is reduced to a poor one-dimensional vision, which emphasizes contempt for life, individualism, the triumph of the amoral, and so forth.
We have to remember that the film industry is one of the cultural industries, and it influences the way the public thinks about and sees the world. This is why UNESCO has been promoting the creation of public policies to enable the signatory countries, like Mexico, to guarantee the circulation of works of global imagination. Regrettably, in the 12 years since signing, our country has done nothing about this.
It is time to take advantage of the renegotiation of NAFTA, to restore the sovereignty of our national film culture.
*Editor’s note: Carlos Salinas de Gortari is a Mexican economist and politician affiliated with the Institutional Revolutionary Party who served as president of Mexico from 1988 to 1994.
**Translator’s note: Data on the numbers of releases and copies over time in Mexico and the U.S. are available in the table in the original Spanish-language article linked above. The column headings in the Table are, from left to right: Year; Mexico Number of Releases, Number of Copies, Number of Copies per Release; U.S. Number of Releases, Number of Copies, Number of Copies per Release. The translated note at the bottom of the Table reads: Source: Table prepared by Rafael E. Portas, of the Observatorio Público Cinematográfico, with data from Comscore, Rentrak, Nielsen, Imcine & the preparer.
Cine mexicano y negociación del TLCAN
La jornada (México)
Por Víctor Ugalde
13 de mayo de 2017
¿Se cancela o se renegocia? Todo es incertidumbre, creada escandalosamente, de forma mediática y tuitera, por la estrategia que sigue Donald Trump ante la nueva relación que viven nuestros países, donde se nos trata con desprecio nunca antes visto, pero sí sentido. Desgraciadamente, hasta el momento, nuestro gobierno no ha dado respuestas que ofrezcan muestras de firmeza y dignidad en defensa de lo nuestro.
Lo único claro y cierto es que el gran ganador del Tratado de Libre Comercio de América del Norte (TLCAN), en el que nos metió Carlos Salinas de Gortari, contra nuestra voluntad, ha sido Estados Unidos, aunque el presidente gringo sostenga lo contrario y quiera obtener todavía más ventajas en contra de los intereses nacionales.
Los malos resultados económicos y culturales saltan a la vista en el cine. Semana a semana las 6 mil 400 salas que existen en las 173 ciudades de la República se saturan con estrenos estadunidenses, dejando sin opciones reales al público mexicano. Se educan, lo quieran o no día a día, informalmente, con lo gringo o sufren múltiples obstáculos y problemas para encontrar otro tipo de cine o de cultura cuando quieren divertirse o informarse.
Los horarios, las pantallas y los cines privilegian los estrenos estadunidenses y marginan, relegan y perjudican al cine mexicano y del mundo, con prácticas contrarias a la libre competencia, como el dumping, el desplazamiento por saturación que reduce la oferta y otras inequidades más.
Todo, ante la inacción y el silencio de la Secretaría de Economía, la Comisión Federal de Competencia Económica y la Procuraduría Federal del Consumidor, que deberían actuar de oficio, de acuerdo con la normatividad; sin embargo, copiando al impulsor de la firma del TLCAN –el ex presidente Salinas–, ni ven ni oyen, y por esto sufrimos un daño serio en la producción, al contar con una cadena productiva insana que nos coloca en amenaza seria y en riesgo de extinción.
Las cifras no mienten. En 10 años, los gringos han venido saturando las pantallas nacionales, al pasar de 36 mil 109 copias al año, en 2007, con 179 títulos, a 181 mil 51 copias en 2016, con sólo 190 estrenos; es decir, hubo un incremento de 401 por ciento en la década pasada, mientras sus estrenos sólo crecieron 6 por ciento (ver cuadro).
Esto equivalió a estrenar cada título estadunidense con 953 copias en promedio en 2016, aunque en realidad estrenaron 12 filmes en más de 3 mil 934 pantallas, es decir, acapararon 61.44 por ciento del total de los cines, mes a mes, únicamente con un título. Valgan de ejemplo: Capitán América, que ocupó 5 mil 422 pantallas (84.72 por ciento) y Batman y Superman, con 4 mil 677 (73.07 por ciento).
Si analizamos las 52 cintas que se estrenaron con más de mil 500 copias, ocuparon semanalmente 42.27 por ciento de las posibilidades existentes.
En contraparte, las cintas mexicanas que se estrenaron el año pasado lo hicieron con el pobre promedio de 274 copias, y las del resto del mundo fueron 91 copias por título, por falta de espacios.
La actual política invasiva de pantallas, para desaparecer y minimizar a la competencia, que utiliza la MPA es un acto comercial que impide la circulación de las ideas en las salas, lo que reduce la comunicación del imaginario nacional y mundial con los ciudadanos mexicanos. Con esto se limita el enriquecimiento de la cultura mundial y se reduce a una pobre visión unipolar, donde se destaca el desprecio a la vida, el individualismo, el triunfo sin ética, etcétera.
Hay que tener en cuenta que el cine es parte de las industrias culturales y que su contacto con el público incide en su forma de pensar y ver el mundo; por esto la Unesco ha venido impulsando la creación de políticas públicas para que los estados firmantes, como México, garanticen la circulación del imaginario mundial; desgraciadamente, nuestro país nada ha hecho al respecto a 12 años de su firma.
Es tiempo de aprovechar la renegociación del TLCAN para recuperar nuestra soberanía cultural fílmica.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link
.
These costly U.S. attacks failed to achieve their goals, but were conducted in order to inflict a blow against Yemen, for daring to challenge the Israelis.
These costly U.S. attacks failed to achieve their goals, but were conducted in order to inflict a blow against Yemen, for daring to challenge the Israelis.