Trump and Cuba (and Venezuela)

Published in El País
(Spain) on 18 June 2017
by Héctor E. Schamis (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Lena Greenberg. Edited by Christine Murrison.
A new approach highlights Obama’s shortsightedness.

The scene had a certain retro feel to it. In Miami, surrounded by hardcore anti-Castro sentiment, Trump fit in perfectly. In another era, this would have been the heart of Florida’s power elite, if not for the ideological diversity that now exists within the Cuban community − largely due to generational change − and their unpredictable behavior come election time. Bear in mind that Florida is now a swing state.

Trump’s words were tough, and he said them with his usual bent for confrontation. He showed almost as much animosity toward Obama as he did toward the Castros and communism. Trump always makes it clear that his priority is to undo his predecessor’s legacy. Whether or not this actually happens is irrelevant; he will always say that he is the anti-Obama.

In reality, Trump’s plan for Cuba preserves much of the situation he inherited. Diplomatic relations will remain intact, with embassies in both capital cities, and some Cuban goods will still be allowed into the United States, despite the ratification of the embargo.

However, there will also be changes, including the promotion of widespread internet access on the island and a more rigorous enforcement of tourism restrictions, which exist on paper but often not in practice. Even more meaningfully, Trump has banned Americans from doing business with Cuban companies owned by the military and intelligence apparatus. This is because the economic opening up of the country has directly and indirectly benefited the party bureaucracy, while the people’s hardships have remained.

What’s happened is that a model of “capitalism for the elites” has been established on the island. For the American elite, this has been accomplished through tourism and golf courses; for the Cuban elite, by turning the ruling class into a foreign investment partner. Wealth is not distributed; it belongs entirely to those who are also running the state. And then there’s nepotism, typical of a family who’s been in power for six decades.

It’s not an original model. This is what many of the post-communist transitions have been like in Europe and Asia. With economic power in its hands, the regime obtains the resources to keep its political power intact. Wherever this kind of transition takes place, democracy has been sacrificed as a result. As in China and Vietnam, single-party capitalism is the goal of the Castro oligarchy.

Trump changed the script and did so explicitly: Cuba must free the political prisoners, respect freedom of speech and freedom of assembly, legalize all political parties and hold free elections with international observers present. People are already saying how ironic it is that Trump, ally of Saudi Arabia and admirer of Putin, should be the one to call for human rights in Cuba.

But looking beyond such contradictions, which are the foundation of politics, Trump has been effective in demonstrating the shortsightedness of the Obama administration’s bad deal, which gave a lot in exchange for nothing. And Trump isn’t the first to point that out. It’s a proven fact that Cubans haven’t been enjoying greater freedom since the re-establishment of diplomatic relations with the United States.

In fact, they have less freedom. Following the thaw in relations with the United States, Cuba has become a theme park where Lagerfeld walks the runway, Mick Jagger sings and Madonna dances on top of a table: Disney-Cuba, as has been aptly observed. Wasn’t that the big criticism of Fulgencio Batista? Now more repression is needed to keep the dissidents out of the view of international celebrities.

It inconveniences progressives for Trump to be right, but they should know that bending to another country in this way is never advisable. Especially not when it necessitates closing one’s eyes to reality, be it in Cuba or in Venezuela. For Trump also sent a message to Venezuela, which has been reduced to a kind of protectorate with a constitutional system made in the image of the Cuban Communist Party.

It’s been clear ever since the onset of Hugo Chávez’ illness that Nicolás Maduro, the current president of Venezuela, would be a simple pawn of the Castros. Clear to anyone who’s not as shortsighted as Obama, of course.



Trump y Cuba (y Venezuela)
Un nuevo guion expone la miopía de Obama



La escena tenía un cierto aire retro. En Miami rodeado del anti-castrismo puro y duro, Trump era uno más entre ellos. En otra época habría sido la elite del poder de Florida, si no fuera que la ideología de la comunidad cubana es diversa hoy—en gran parte por el cambio generacional—y su comportamiento electoral volátil. Téngase en cuenta que el estado es ahora un “swing state”.

Las palabras fueron fuertes, dichas con su acostumbrada propensión a confrontar. A la animosidad con los Castro y el comunismo le agregó similares dosis de encono hacia Obama. Trump siempre deja en claro que su prioridad es deshacer el legado de su antecesor. Es menos relevante si ello efectivamente ocurre en la realidad, Trump siempre dirá que es el anti-Obama.

De hecho, lo anunciado en relación a Cuba ofrece una buena cuota de continuidad con lo heredado. Las relaciones diplomáticas se mantendrán intactas, con embajadas en ambas capitales, y se conservarán las mismas exenciones a los bienes cubanos permitidos de ser ingresados a Estados Unidos, ello a pesar de la ratificación del embargo.

Sin embargo, también habrá cambios: promover un amplio acceso a internet en la isla y aplicar con mayor rigor las restricciones al turismo, una ley escrita que con frecuencia no se cumple. De manera aún más significativa, el decreto de Trump prohíbe a los estadounidenses comerciar con firmas cubanas de propiedad del aparato militar y de inteligencia. Es que la apertura económica ha beneficiado directa e inmediatamente a la burocracia del partido mientras se mantienen las viejas penurias para la población.

Ocurre que se ha instalado en la isla un diseño de capitalismo para las elites. Para la americana por la vía del turismo y los campos de golf; para la cubana transformando a la alta nomenclatura en socia de las inversiones extranjeras. La riqueza no se distribuye, se concentra en quien, además, controla el Estado. Agréguese el usual nepotismo de una familia que ejerce el poder desde hace seis décadas.

No es un modelo original. Así ha sido una buena parte de las transiciones post-comunistas de Europa y Asia. Con poder económico en sus manos, el régimen obtiene recursos para mantener su poder político incólume. Allí donde se observa dicha trayectoria de transformación, el resultado ha sido sacrificar la democracia. Como en China y Vietnam, capitalismo de partido único es el objetivo de la oligarquía castrista.

Trump alteró el guion y lo hizo explícitamente: Cuba debe liberar a los presos políticos, respetar la libertad de expresión y de reunión, legalizar todos los partidos y llevar a cabo elecciones libres con observación internacional. Ya se dice que es paradójico que sea él, aliado de Arabia Saudita y admirador de Putin, quien reclame derechos en Cuba.

Más allá de paradojas, que son la materia prima de la política, Trump ha sido efectivo en exponer la miopía del gobierno de Obama: el “bad deal”, conceder mucho a cambio de nada. Y no es Trump el primero en señalarlo. Es un hecho constatado que los cubanos no gozan de más libertades desde el restablecimiento de relaciones con Estados Unidos.

En realidad, menos. La Cuba del deshielo se ha transformado en un parque temático en donde desfila Lagerfeld, Mick Jagger canta y Madonna baila arriba de una mesa; Cuba-Disney, según ha sido observado lúcidamente. ¿No era esa la gran crítica a Fulgencio Batista? Pues se requiere de más represión para ocultar a los disidentes del campo visual de las celebridades internacionales.

Incomoda al progresismo que Trump tenga razón, pero deberían saber que la obsecuencia nunca es aconsejable. Ello especialmente cuando requiere cerrar los ojos ante la realidad, ya sea la de Cuba o la de Venezuela. Es que Trump también envió un mensaje a Caracas, reducida hoy a una suerte de protectorado con un proyecto constitucional a la medida del Partido Comunista cubano.

Ya era evidente desde la enfermedad de Chávez que Maduro sería un simple empleado de los Castro. Evidente para quien no sufra de miopía como Obama, claro está.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Russia: Political Analyst Reveals the Real Reason behind US Tariffs*

Israel: Trump’s National Security Adviser Forgot To Leave Personal Agenda at Home and Fell

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Germany: Absolute Arbitrariness

Topics

Germany: Absolute Arbitrariness

Israel: Trump’s National Security Adviser Forgot To Leave Personal Agenda at Home and Fell

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Venezuela: Vietnam: An Outlet for China

Russia: Political Analyst Reveals the Real Reason behind US Tariffs*

Poland: Meloni in the White House. Has Trump Forgotten Poland?*

Related Articles

Germany: Absolute Arbitrariness

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Russia: Political Analyst Reveals the Real Reason behind US Tariffs*

Poland: Meloni in the White House. Has Trump Forgotten Poland?*