Japan-US Alliance Needs Further Elaboration

Published in Nikkei Shimbun
(Japan) on 19 August 2017
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Fatuma Muhamed. Edited by Elizabeth Cosgriff.
The U.S. and Japan will hold their first “two plus two” meeting, bringing together two ministers of foreign affairs and defense from each country. Both sides agree that stronger pressure should be applied to North Korea, as it stubbornly continues to develop nuclear missiles. In order to contain it, Japan and the U.S. must display unbroken cooperation. I would like to give credit to the U.S. for making it clear that it will continue to participate in Japan's defense.

The situation on the Korean Peninsula is not one such that a lenient, simple presentation of documents in praise of Japan-U.S. unity will be enough to drive off danger. It is essential that the two countries further flesh out this alliance, with a firm basis in mutual agreement.

Japan announced an expansion of the role of national self-defense, but how will this proceed? I would like to see this explained to the people in a way that is easy to understand, with a connection drawn between this and the National Defense Program Guidelines revisions, which will be enacted this fall.

Unlike the previous two plus two meeting held two years ago to revise the guidelines of cooperation in mutual defense, this upcoming meeting is not strictly necessary. In this instance, the U.S. is granting the strong wish of the Abe administration.

Concerns over the Trump administration set the scene for this meeting. When Donald Trump and Shinzo Abe met in February, Trump referred to the importance of the Japan-U.S. alliance, but even now people remember the isolationist comments he made during his presidential campaign.

Trump also sought an avenue to display the Japan-U.S. alliance, to prove to North Korea and China that the U.S. would defend Japan and South Korea.

If we think about such circumstances, it is obvious that Japan should work on strengthening its own defenses. Minister of Defense Itsunori Onodera announced plans to install a new land missile defense system, Aegis Ashore, which is a step in that direction. Eventually, Japan and the U.S. will venture into a unified missile defense system – that is the path to making the Japan-U.S. alliance even stronger.

They should also begin to consider the ultimate missile defense – an attack on enemy bases.

Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull once declared, “If there is an attack on the United States by North Korea, then the ANZUS* will be invoked and Australia will come to the aid of the United States.” Turnbull has pointed out that while he and Trump do not always see eye to eye, their disagreements do not impact their alliance.

Australia and the U.S. are obligated to defend one another under the ANZUS treaty, while Japan, under the Japan-U.S. Security Treaty, does not have the same responsibility to defend the U.S. It would not be appropriate to discuss the two as though they were the same. Nonetheless, the North Korea problem is a matter of life and death for Japan.

In order to continue attracting the United States' gaze toward Asia, Japan and the U.S. must tackle the issue of stability in Asia as a unified front.

*Translator’s note: ANZUS stands for the 1951 Australia, New Zealand, United States Security Treaty.


 日米の外務・防衛担当閣僚協議(2プラス2)が開かれ、北朝鮮への圧力を一段と強めることで一致した。核・ミサイル開発に固執する北朝鮮を封じ込めるには、日米の隙のない連携を印象付ける必要がある。米国が日本防衛に関与し続ける姿勢を明確にしたことを評価したい。

 ただ、日米が結束をうたった文書を発表すればそれで危機が去るほど、朝鮮半島情勢は甘くない。合意を踏まえ、同盟をさらに肉付けすることが重要だ。

 日本が表明した自国防衛における役割の拡大をどう進めるのか。国民に分かりやすく説明し、秋から本格化する防衛大綱の改定作業につなげてもらいたい。

 今回の2プラス2は、防衛協力の指針(ガイドライン)の改定を決めた2年前の前回と異なり、どうしても開かなくてはならないわけではなかった。安倍政権が強く望み、米側が応じた。

 背景にあるのは、米トランプ政権への懸念だ。2月の日米首脳会談でトランプ大統領は日米同盟の重要性に言及したが、大統領選の期間中に繰り返した孤立主義的な発言はなお記憶にある。

 北朝鮮や中国に「米国は日本や韓国を守らない」と誤解させないためにも、日米同盟を見せつける場を求めた。

 そうした事情を考えれば日本自らが防衛力の強化に動くのは当然だ。小野寺五典防衛相が表明した地上配備型のミサイル防衛システム「イージス・アショア」の導入はその一歩である。いずれは日米のミサイル防衛システムの一体運用へと踏み込む。それこそが日米同盟の効力をより高める道だ。

 究極のミサイル防衛ともいえる敵基地攻撃についても検討を始めておくべきだ。

 オーストラリアのターンブル首相は「北朝鮮が米国を攻撃した場合、米国の支援に向かう」と明言した。同首相はトランプ氏との不仲が指摘されているが、国同士の同盟とはそんな事情に左右されるものではないことを示した。

 相互防衛が条約で義務化されている米豪と、日本が米国を守る義務を負わない日米安保体制を同一に論じるのは適当ではない。とはいえ、北朝鮮問題は日本にとって死活的な意味を持つ。

 米国の視線をアジアに引きつけ続けるには、日米一体でアジアの安定に取り組む姿勢をみせなくてならない。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Topics

Poland: Meloni in the White House. Has Trump Forgotten Poland?*

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats

Mauritius: Could Trump Be Leading the World into Recession?

India: World in Flux: India Must See Bigger Trade Picture

Palestine: US vs. Ansarallah: Will Trump Launch a Ground War in Yemen for Israel?

Ukraine: Trump Faces Uneasy Choices on Russia’s War as His ‘Compromise Strategy’ Is Failing

Related Articles

Poland: Meloni in the White House. Has Trump Forgotten Poland?*

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats

Mauritius: Could Trump Be Leading the World into Recession?

India: World in Flux: India Must See Bigger Trade Picture

Palestine: US vs. Ansarallah: Will Trump Launch a Ground War in Yemen for Israel?

Previous article
Next article