New Trump Stronghold

Published in El Universal
(Mexico) on 6 September 2018
by Mario Melgar Adalid (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by William Mastick. Edited by Helaine Schweitzer.
In the United States, appointing the next associate justice of the Supreme Court is as important or even more important than November’s midterm elections. With this inevitable confirmation, Trump will ensure a conservative court. The country's political agenda will undergo a significant change and Trump will have five or six allies—Chief John Roberts swings from both sides with liberal and conservative votes—in the nine members of the Court. The new makeup will be useful for Trump, especially if the Republicans lose Congress and the idea of impeachment proceedings moves forward.

In 1830 when Alexis de Tocqueville learned about the U.S. system, he indicated that it would be difficult to find a political issue that would not become a judicial matter. That is why during the Donald Trump-Hillary Clinton presidential campaign, Democrats warned about the risk of not only losing the presidency, but also losing the political agenda. The significance is more ideological than political.

The court will consider specific issues, but that the Supreme Court will become a conservative bastion, and with it, will lose the legitimacy of neutrality that should define it, is much more relevant. Such issues under consideration are: minorities’ right to vote, workers’ right to better wages and work conditions, consumers’ ability to defend themselves against corporations and a woman’s right to make decisions about her own body. It will make it easier and strengthen the right to purchase and sell firearms, even those designed for mass attacks, and laws discriminating against gays and those identifying as transsexual will be enacted.

This week, hearings will be conducted by the Senate to decide on whether to confirm the newest member of the court. Despite irate protests from liberal groups on the Senate floor, this is political pretense, since in the case of the nomination of the previous justice, Neil Gorsuch, Republicans changed the rules so that a simple majority, which they currently hold, can vote to confirm and ratify the nomination.

The candidate for new associate justice, Brett Kavanaugh, who was nominated by Trump, is 54 years old and if confirmed, would serve on the Supreme Court for life, which ensures another conservative seat for at least the next 25 years given a life expectancy of 78 years. The conservative agenda will stay firmly in place with five associate justices backing it even further.

If Democrats win majorities in the Senate and the House of Representatives, they would be able to modify some laws. Perhaps they would be inspired by the Mexican Constitution which may provide guidance in terms of judicial organization.

For example, canceling the life long appointment. In Mexico, ministers serve for 15 years. Democrats could consider something similar and allow each president to name no more than two associate justices during their term. In less than two years, Trump already has two appointments, and will surely replace the liberal judge Ruth Bader Ginsburg given her advanced age. Another measure could increase the number of associate justices, as Franklin D. Roosevelt unsuccessfully tried after opposition to his New Deal from the conservative court. Lastly, there is the possibility of modifying laws regarding the chief justice. In contrast to Mexico where ministers name their chief every four years from among the ministers themselves, in the United States, the president appoints the chief justice of the Supreme Court for life and it does not necessarily have to be a associate justice.*

In Mexico, the Mexican Supreme Court is decided as soon as the new government takes over. President of the Supreme Court of Justice Luis María Aguilar ends his term and the ministers designate a new chief. The question is whether it will be a minister from "the outside” or a member of the judicial system, which essentially means deciding if it will be a liberal or conservative minister. Next year, President Andrés Manuel López Obrador will have to come up with six jurists to send on two lists to the Senate, when Ministers Margarita Luna Ramos and José Ramón Cossío complete their terms.

*Editor’s note: The chief justice is appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate. There is no requirement that the chief justice serve as an associate justice first, but five of the 17 chief justices of the U.S. Supreme Court have served on the court as associate justices prior to becoming chief justice.


En Estados Unidos tanto o más importante que las elecciones intermedias de noviembre será la designación del próximo juez asociado (ministro) de la Suprema Corte. Con este nombramiento inevitable, Trump asegurará una Corte conservadora. La agenda política de ese país sufrirá un notable cambio y Trump tendrá cinco o seis aliados (el presidente Roberts batea de los dos lados: vota liberal o conservador) de los nueve integrantes de la Corte. La nueva composición será útil para Trump, especialmente si los republicanos pierden el Congreso y avanza la idea del impeachment en su contra.

Desde 1830, cuando Alexis de Tocqueville conoció el sistema estadounidense, había señalado que era difícil encontrar un asunto político que no se convirtiera en una cuestión judicial. Por eso durante la campaña política Trump-Hillary los demócratas advertían el riesgo, no solamente de perder la presidencia, sino de perder la agenda política. El asunto tiene una significación más ideológica que estrictamente política.

Se van a revisar cuestiones puntuales, pero más relevante será que la Suprema Corte se convierta en un bastión conservador y pierda con ello la legitimidad neutral que debe caracterizarla. Las cuestiones puntuales son varias: para las minorías afectará su derecho al voto, para los trabajadores su derecho a mejores salarios y condiciones laborales, para los consumidores su capacidad para defenderse de las corporaciones comerciales, para las mujeres el derecho a decidir sobre su cuerpo. Se facilitará y reforzará la libertad y el derecho de comprar y vender armas, aun las diseñadas para ataques masivos, y vendrán leyes que discriminen a homosexuales, lesbianas y quienes tengan identidad transexual.

En esta semana se llevarán a cabo las audiencias para que el Senado confirme al nuevo integrante de la Corte. A pesar de las airadas protestas de grupos liberales en el Senado, se trata de una simulación política, pues desde la nominación del juez anterior, Neil Gorsuch, los republicanos modificaron las reglas para que una mayoría simple, con la que cuentan, pueda hacer la ratificación.

El nuevo juez asociado Brett Kavanaugh, el nominado por Trump, tiene 54 años y estará en la Suprema Corte de por vida, lo que asegura un asiento conservador más para los próximos 25 años cuando menos, en razón de la expectativa de vida de 78 años. La agenda conservadora quedará firmemente sostenida por cinco jueces asociados que la apuntalarán aún más.

Si los demócratas ganan mayorías en el Senado y en la Cámara de Representantes podrían intentar modificar algunas reglas. Podrían inspirarse en el constitucionalismo mexicano, que en materia de organización judicial puede dar orientaciones.

Por ejemplo, cancelar la regla de disponer del cargo de por vida. En México los ministros duran en su encargo 15 años. Podían pensar en algo similar y permitir que cada presidente nombre no más de dos jueces asociados en su gestión. Trump en menos de dos años ya lleva dos designaciones y seguramente tendrá a quien sustituya a la jueza liberal Ruth Bader Gingsbur por su avanzada edad. Otra medida podría ser aumentar el número de jueces asociados, como lo intentó fallidamente Franklin D. Roosevelt, que encontró la oposición de la corte conservadora a sus ideas del New Deal. Una más, modificar la regla de designación del presidente de la Suprema Corte. Al contrario de México en que los ministros nombran cada cuatro años a su presidente, de entre los ministros, en Estados Unidos el presidente nombra al presidente de la Suprema Corte de por vida y no necesariamente tiene que ser juez.

En México se hablará de la Suprema Corte mexicana tan pronto llegue el nuevo gobierno. El presidente Luis María Aguilar concluye su periodo y los ministros designarán a un nuevo presidente. La incógnita es si será un ministro “de afuera” o un integrante de la carrera judicial, lo que casi significa si será un ministro liberal o un conservador. El año próximo el presidente Andrés Manuel López Obrador tendrá que pensar en seis juristas para enviar dos ternas al Senado. Los ministros Margarita Luna Ramos y José Ramón Cossío concluyen su periodo.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Australia: What US Intelligence and Leaks Tell Us about ‘Operation Midnight Hammer’

Germany: Trump’s Opportunity in Iran

China: US Chip Restrictions Backfiring

Switzerland: Ukraine Is No Longer a Priority for America: Trump Leaves the Country High and Dry

Poland: Calm in Iran Doesn’t Mean Peace Yet

Topics

Australia: Australia Is Far from Its Own Zohran Mamdani Moment. Here’s Why

Canada: How Ottawa Gift-Wrapped our Dairy Sector for Trump

Canada: New York Swoons over an American Justin Trudeau

Germany: Europe Bending the Knee to Trump

Germany: NATO Secretary General Showers Trump with Praise: It Seems Rutte Wanted To Keep the Emperor Happy

China: US Chip Restrictions Backfiring

China: US Visa Policy Policing Students

Pakistan: American Jingoism Hurts Americans

Related Articles

Canada: How Ottawa Gift-Wrapped our Dairy Sector for Trump

Germany: Europe Bending the Knee to Trump

Germany: NATO Secretary General Showers Trump with Praise: It Seems Rutte Wanted To Keep the Emperor Happy

China: US Visa Policy Policing Students

Pakistan: American Jingoism Hurts Americans