Why US Millennials Are Attracted to Socialism

Published in Huanqiu
(China) on 11 November 2018
by Wu Bo (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Daniel Chow. Edited by Nkem Okafor.
Lately, a U.S. polling company published the results of a survey regarding opinions on issues such as socialism and communism. More than half of American millennials (25-35 years old) selected socialism as their first choice, such that those who hoped to live in a socialist country outnumbered those who wished to live in a capitalist country. Another survey this year, by the U.S. company Gallup, showed that the views of young Americans had changed since 2016, with socialism viewed more favorably than capitalism. Why are more young Americans living in the heart of Western capitalism leaning toward socialism? Clearly this is an issue worth pondering.

Currently, the U.S. economy is growing strongly, and unemployment is at its lowest point in nearly half a century, so why are millennials still worried? A polarized, structurally divided society has increased feelings of inequality and dissatisfaction, and this is the root of the problem. A millennial from Washington D.C., Elena Botella, reflects the inner fears of this generation: even in a land of abundance, a lot of people will “never have enough in savings to stop worrying,”* let alone to fulfill their larger potential.

As reported by the U.S. media, American millennials really do not have a deep enough understanding of socialism or communism. What many associate with socialism are Western European and Scandinavian countries that have performed well in terms of income equality and social welfare. The model of democratic socialism is just an improved version of capitalism and not the real, scientific version of socialism. It is just that compared to American-style capitalism, there are quite a few elements of socialism, and this results in a kind of intuitive attraction for millennials. If millennials do not have a deep enough understanding of socialism or communism, then the understanding of socialism and communism by the mainstream U.S. still maintains a bias. They insist on fixing socialism as it was in the Soviet Union of the 20th century. This has long been an ingrained ideology.

More young Americans have a favorable opinion of socialism than capitalism, but this does not mean that they are attracted to the world of communism from the depths of their hearts. As such, we can only grasp the actual meaning of this change based on this "favorable opinion." After being dissatisfied with the polarization of politics and the economic system, what many millennials seem to be more interested in is just harmonizing and not replacing capitalism. As an article published in The Christian Science Monitor pointed out, "All this hardly means that a Marxist revolution is imminent."*

However, the occurrence of this phenomenon is definitely not a fluke of history but rather the inevitable outcome of historical logic. It is worth analyzing that American youth have even touched upon the values of freedom and equality and rethinking the feasibility of the American Dream. More than half of millennials agree to a certain extent on the restriction of free speech, including criticisms against core Western values and beliefs. In the eyes of young Americans, the problem can simply be summed up in two words, equality and opportunity, and these two aspects happen to be the two major pillars and advantages of the American Dream.

It has been 20 years since the collapse of the Soviet Union and the surging wave of globalization, and the revolutionary meaning of science, technology and globalization is increasingly obvious. For a China intent on creating a new kind of civilization, the thoughts of American youth are excellent materials for teaching by negative example: this new exploration of civilization must include corrections to the logic of capital, or there can be nothing to speak about.

The author is a researcher at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.

*Editor’s note: This quote, correctly translated, could not be verified.


近日,美国某民调公司公布一项关于对社会主义和共产主义等问题看法的调查结果。超过半数的美国“千禧一代”(25岁-35岁)将社会主义作为第一选择,表示希望生活在社会主义国家,超过希望生活在资本主义国家的人。美国盖洛普公司今年的另一项民调也说明,当今美国年轻人的看法自2016年以来发生转变,对社会主义比对资本主义更有好感。处于西方资本主义心脏的美国年轻人为何越来越多地倾向社会主义?这显然是一个值得深思的问题。

  当前美国经济发展强劲,失业率正接近半个世纪以来的最低点,但“千禧一代”为何仍然感到担忧。两极化的结构分裂社会,助推了不平等和不满情绪,这是问题的根本所在。作为华盛顿特区的一名“千禧一代”,埃琳娜·博泰拉的一番话集中反映了这一代内心的不安:即使是在一个富足的国度里,很多人也“永远没有足够的储蓄以停止担忧”,更不用说发挥出自己更大的潜力了。

  如美国媒体所言,美国“千禧一代”对社会主义或共产主义的理解,确实是不够深刻的。他们关于社会主义的联想,是在收入平等、社会福利方面拥有良好表现的西欧和北欧。民主社会主义的模式只是资本主义的改良版本,而不是科学社会主义的现实版本,只不过与美国式样的资本主义相比,社会主义因素有不少增添,因而对美国“千禧一代”产生了一种直观的吸引力。如果说“千禧一代”对社会主义或共产主义的理解不够深刻的话,那么美国主流对社会主义或共产主义的理解则依然保持着偏见。他们坚持把社会主义定位于20世纪的苏联,这早已成为一种根深蒂固的意识形态。

  越来越多的美国年轻人对社会主义比对资本主义更有好感,并不意味着他们内心深处滋生出对共产主义彼岸世界的向往,因此,我们只能从“好感”出发来把握这一变化的现实意义。主要的只是不满和批判而已。在对政治两极分化和经济体制的不满之后,许多“千禧一代”似乎更感兴趣的,也只是调和而不是替换资本主义。正如美国《基督教科学箴言报》网站刊载文章指出的那样:“这一切并不意味着一场马克思主义革命迫在眉睫”。

  不过,这一现象的发生绝不是历史的误会,而是历史逻辑的必然。其中最具分析价值的是,美国年轻人甚至已经触及对自由和公平等价值观以及美国梦可行性的反思。超过半数的“千禧一代”赞成在某种程度上限制言论自由,这也包含对西方核心价值理念的批判。在美国年轻人看来,问题可简单地归结为两个:平等和机遇,而这两个方面恰是美国梦的两大支柱和优势所在。

  在苏联解体、全球化浪潮汹涌澎湃20多年之后,科学技术和全球化的革命性意义正在逐步彰显。这对于志在创造新的文明类型的中国来说,美国年轻人的想法无疑是一个很好的反思材料:这个新的文明探索必须包含对资本的逻辑的修正,否则无从谈起。(作者是中国社会科学院研究员)
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Mexico: EU: Concern for the Press

Venezuela: Vietnam: An Outlet for China

Israel: Trump’s National Security Adviser Forgot To Leave Personal Agenda at Home and Fell

Austria: Trump’s Film Tariffs Hurt Hollywood

Topics

Canada: The Walls Are Closing in on Donald Trump’s Ramblings

   

Austria: Trump’s Film Tariffs Hurt Hollywood

Japan: Trump’s 100 Days: A Future with No Visible Change So Far

Mexico: EU: Concern for the Press

Austria: Musk, the Man of Scorched Earth

Germany: Cynicism, Incompetence and Megalomania

Switzerland: Donald Trump: 100 Days Already, but How Many Years?

     

Austria: Donald Trump Revives the Liberals in Canada

Related Articles

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Venezuela: Vietnam: An Outlet for China

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Hong Kong: Can US Tariffs Targeting Hong Kong’s ‘Very Survival’ Really Choke the Life out of It?