The president announces new measures of doubtful legality against immigrants
Donald Trump's obsession with immigration has taken on a new dimension that goes beyond both common sense and fundamental human rights and even the constitutional order of the world's most powerful democracy.
The president of the United States has already provided plenty of evidence that none of the proposals he launches − however unorthodox the means he uses − should be taken lightly. The latest example is his offer to buy Greenland from Denmark, which has developed from an idea into an inconceivable bilateral crisis between Washington and Copenhagen. And, from the moment the New York millionaire arrived at the White House in January 2017, if there has been a common thread in his torrent of controversial initiatives − where such initiatives have not been illegal − it is immigration.
The announcement of a regulatory change that will allow border agents to indefinitely detain immigrant families without legal documentation, thus annulling the agreement that forces detained minors to go free after 20 days, is another policy twist that seeks political benefit regardless of its legality. Trump has previously seen how the courts are doing away with similar initiatives concerning minors. His systematic attempt to subvert a 1997 ruling that guarantees a maximum detention time − a behavior which also contravenes the separation of powers − is leading the president to adopt measures that will cause unnecessary suffering to detainees, as well as to a new battle in the courts.
In this way, Trump has resurrected an idea, already set out in his campaign, which involves not only a constitutional change but also the modification of the very nature of American society. The president wants to annul the right to citizenship by birth that has been in place since 1868. To do this, he relies on the fallacy that the United States is the only country in the world that applies this law, when in fact it exists in almost every country in Central America and in 16% of all countries on this planet.
El presidente anuncia nuevas medidas de dudosa legalidad contra los inmigrantes
La obsesión de Donald Trump con la inmigración ha tomado un cariz que sobrepasa tanto el sentido común como los derechos fundamentales de las personas e incluso el mismo orden constitucional de la democracia más poderosa del mundo.
El presidente de EE UU ya ha dado sobradas muestras de que ninguna de las propuestas que lanza —por muy poco ortodoxo que sea el medio que utilice— debe ser tomada a la ligera. El último ejemplo es la oferta de compra de Groenlandia a Dinamarca, que ha pasado de ser considerada una ocurrencia a generar una inconcebible crisis bilateral entre Washington y Copenhague. Y si ha habido un hilo conductor en esta cascada de iniciativas polémicas —cuando no ilegales— desde el mismo momento en que el millonario neoyorquino llegó a la Casa Blanca en enero de 2017 ese ha sido la inmigración.
El anuncio de un cambio normativo que permitirá a los agentes fronterizos detener de forma indefinida a familias inmigrantes sin papeles, anulando de esta forma el acuerdo que obliga a que los menores retenidos queden libres a los 20 días, es otra vuelta de tuerca de una política que busca el rédito político al margen de la legalidad. Trump ya ha visto anteriormente cómo los tribunales tiraban abajo iniciativas similares referidas a los menores. Su sistemático intento de subvertir una sentencia de 1997, que garantiza un tiempo máximo de detención —actitud que además contraviene la separación de poderes— está llevando al mandatario a adoptar medidas que provocarán sufrimiento innecesario a los detenidos además de una nueva batalla en los tribunales.
En esta línea, Trump ha resucitado una idea, ya expuesta en su campaña, que implica no solo un cambio constitucional, sino la modificación de la misma naturaleza de la sociedad estadounidense. El presidente quiere anular el derecho a ciudadanía por nacimiento, vigente desde 1868. Para ello se ampara en la falacia de que EE UU es el único país del mundo que lo aplica, cuando en realidad existe en casi todos los países de América y en el 16% de los Estados del planet.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link
.
These costly U.S. attacks failed to achieve their goals, but were conducted in order to inflict a blow against Yemen, for daring to challenge the Israelis.
These costly U.S. attacks failed to achieve their goals, but were conducted in order to inflict a blow against Yemen, for daring to challenge the Israelis.