Donald Trump’s Bad Week

Published in Milenio
(Mexico) on 18 November 2019
by Carlos Puig (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Patricia Simoni. Edited by Elizabeth Cosgriff.
The president of the United States claimed he had not watched the first day of testimony in the impeachment inquiry being held by the U.S. House of Representatives for the alleged pressuring of the Ukrainian government to offer damaging information about Joe Biden, a likely contender in the presidential election next year.

What is certain is that since Friday he has tweeted and retweeted dozens of times about the hearings, attacking witnesses and Democratic congressmen. On Friday, he tweeted a criticism of the witness, the former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine, and the tweet was entered into the hearing record in real time, eliciting comments from participants — an event without precedent.

The first witnesses, public servants with long and prestigious careers in foreign service chosen by the Democrats for their media impact, were serious and forceful. They meticulously described the attempt by the White House to, initially, form a negotiation channel parallel to official channels, establishing a relationship with the Ukrainian government; and then, to place an investigation of Biden at the center of the discussion. We were introduced to some new elements — most interestingly, a call from Trump to his envoy in Ukraine, insisting that he was interested in the investigation against the Bidens above all.

There was no smoking gun to fell Trump, but there was an accumulation of testimony that confirms a narrative. Also, it was clear that Republicans, thus far, have no intention of backing down, nor are they considering withdrawing support from the president. Moreover, the attorney general gave a speech accusing the Democrats of changing the choice of voting Americans by holding the House procedures.

The week ended with the reelection of Democrat John Bel Edwards in Louisiana, despite Trump's intense campaign for the Republican candidate. A year before the election, hostilities have begun. Democrats continue to accumulate new candidates for the nomination, and the atmosphere in Washington is becoming more polarized with each day.

How far will he go, and what will the president do, in order to continue his hold on his electoral base? That is the question concerning the world.


Dijo el presidente de Estados Unidos que no había visto el primer día de testimonios en el proceso de juicio político que se le sigue en la Cámara de Representantes de su país por presuntamente haber presionado al gobierno de Ucrania para afectar a Joseph Biden, probable contendiente en las elecciones a la Presidencia el año que viene.

Lo que sí es cierto es que desde el viernes ha acumulado decenas de tuits y retuits sobre el procedimiento atacando a testigos y congresistas demócratas. En un acto sin precedentes, uno de sus tuits criticando a la testigo del viernes, la ex embajadora estadunidense en Ucrania, se coló a la sesión del Congreso en tiempo real y fue comentado por los participantes.

Los primeros testigos, elegidos por los demócratas para arrancar causando impacto mediático fueron serios y contundentes. Servidores públicos de largas y prestigiosas carreras en el servicio exterior que describieron con precisión los intentos de la Casa Blanca para, primero, formar un equipo de negociación paralelo al normal para establecer la relación con el gobierno ucraniano y después para colocar la investigación contra Biden en el centro de la discusión. Conocimos algunos elementos nuevos, sobre todo el de una llamada de Trump a su enviado a Ucrania insistiendo que lo que más le interesaba era la investigación contra los Biden.


No hubo un smoking gun que hunda a Trump, pero sí la acumulación de testimonios que confirman una narrativa.
También quedó claro que los republicanos, hasta el momento, no piensan ceder, ni están considerando quitar su apoyo al presidente. Es más: el procurador general dio un discurso acusando a los demócratas de, mediante el procedimiento en la Cámara, alterar la voluntad de los estadunidenses en las urnas.

La semana terminó con la reelección del demócrata John Bel Edwards en Louisiana, a pesar de una intensa campaña de Trump a favor del candidato republicano.
Un año antes de la elección, las hostilidades han iniciado. Los demócratas siguen acumulando nuevos aspirantes a la candidatura y el ambiente en Washington es cada día más polarizado.

¿Hasta dónde y cómo reaccionará el presidente para seguir trabajando a su base electoral? Esa es la pregunta que tiene al mundo preocupado. 
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Canada: Don’t Trust the Democrats. They Will Tariff Us Too, Just with a Smile

Ireland: The Irish Times View on Dolly Parton: No Better American Life

Canada: We’re Firing Blanks in a Tariff War

Topics

Austria: No Victory for Iran, but a Severe Defeat for the US

Spain: Canada Breaks Away from the US

Japan: President Trump: Do Not Empower North Korean Leader Kim

Canada: The Economic Fantasies of Carney and Trump

Canada: The US Has Always Wanted To Absorb Canada for Our Natural Resources

Canada: Canada Shouldn’t Copy Trump’s Beef Blunder

Egypt: Canada–US Trade Talks Collapse

Saudi Arabia: Iran, Hezbollah, and the New US Sanctions That Aim To Take Them Down

Related Articles

Canada: The Economic Fantasies of Carney and Trump

Canada: The US Has Always Wanted To Absorb Canada for Our Natural Resources

Canada: Canada Shouldn’t Copy Trump’s Beef Blunder

Egypt: Canada–US Trade Talks Collapse

Saudi Arabia: Iran, Hezbollah, and the New US Sanctions That Aim To Take Them Down