Let the New Cold War Fail, China Will Have the Last Laugh

Published in Huanqiu
(China) on 6 December 2019
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Liza Roberts. Edited by Helaine Schweitzer.
On Dec. 4, Chinese Ambassador to the United States Cui Tiankai said that he would remain highly vigilant, as current trade disputes are complex and difficult to resolve, and destructive forces are attempting to take advantage of the situation. Extremist language such as "decoupling," "a new cold war," and "clash of civilizations" has entered the scene. Ambassador Cui also said that some Americans have pointed an accusatory finger at China's ruling party and China's system of governance. In doing so, they are trying to rebuild a Berlin Wall of economics, technology and ideology between China and the United States, spread animosity between the people of these two countries and even provoke conflict between them.

China-U.S. relations are indeed facing an unprecedented crossroads, and some Americans have shown that they intend to completely destroy the productive China-U.S. relationship. It is very difficult for China to persuade those people to change their tune. How can China single-handedly influence the future pattern of interaction between these two nations to prevent the rise of forces that want to lead the United States and China to a new cold war? This has become a challenging topic.

We believe it is necessary to first understand the context and actual intensity of the China-U.S. conflict. By far, the most intense U.S. attacks to date have occurred in the economic and ideological arenas. The economy is tied up in trade wars, and there is a clear trend toward decoupling the high-tech sector from economic issues. The U.S. is particularly aggressive in the field of ideology, and its methods of attack are simple and crude.

As for the military arena, the first thing the U.S. has done is to accelerate the development and deployment of high-tech equipment. The second thing the U.S. has done is to strengthen its network of military bases built around China, and the third thing is to increase the frequency of navigation trips through China's offshore waters, with the intention of provoking China.

Together, these actions have dramatically altered the face of China-U.S. relations, which has permitted an atmosphere of tension between the two countries to grow stronger. At the same time, we must also see that the actions of the United States carry even greater significance. There is a general consensus among the American elite to be tough on China, but the goal of these tough policies is still vague. Whether or not the trade war will lead to material gain or strategically overwhelm China, the United States still has some concerns.

It must be noted that the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union did not break out overnight, but instead was the result of increasingly fierce interactions between the two sides, the consequences of which eventually became irreversible. Because the current relationship between China and the United States is fundamentally different from that of the United States and the Soviet Union during the Cold War, it is still possible that the two countries will avoid falling into a spiral of ruthless struggle.

We believe that the situation in the United States is currently unstable, and that some political elites who hold power are somewhat incompetent. However, we must maintain a firm conviction that these elites cannot lead China and the U.S. to a confrontation like the one between the U.S. and the Soviet Union. So long as China adopts a proper strategy for mitigating U.S. provocations, it will be able to resolutely safeguard our country’s core interests, and will be able to foil those who are plotting a new cold war with China.

This goal requires China to demonstrate sufficient strategic stability, maintain confidence in the face of harassment and provocations from the U.S, and accurately assess the extent of the damage that that harassment can actually cause. China must respond resolutely to the U.S. provocation, and must discuss the issues on an ongoing basis. We must not purposely escalate the conflict or allow individual events to impact the overall situation.

China must continue, unswervingly, to expand opening up to the outside world, including the United States. We should coordinate this process with countermeasures that mitigate U.S. provocation and disregard the rest. We must believe that China's opening-up strategy will deflect the effects of radical U.S. policies in the long term, and we must wait patiently for this to be proven over time.

We do not need to maintain a tough posture toward the United States. Instead, we should surpass the Americans in tenacity and flexibility, and outperform it in terms of strategy and maneuverability. This should be a point of pride for Chinese and American society. Let the new cold war, which some of the American elite promote, fail, and let China's development continue in the face of this vile American attitude. If we move forward vigorously, we will have the last laugh.

The future of China-U.S. relations must not follow the path drawn by the radical American elite. We must behave outstandingly in order to allow China-U.S. relations to break away from this script, and for the first time, enable a relationship between great powers to escape the "Thucydides Trap."* That would be a great accomplishment for China, and a joint achievement for China and the United States. With this, the rise of China in the 21st century will benefit the entire human race.

*Editor’s note: The “Thucydides Trap” is a theory propounded by the American political scientist Graham Allison that when one great power threatens to displace another, war almost always results.




中国驻美大使崔天凯4日表示,必须高度警惕,正当贸易争端复杂难解时,一些破坏性势力正在趁虚而入,“脱钩”“新冷战”“文明冲突”等极端主张登堂入室。他还说,美国一些人把矛头指向中国的执政党和中国的国家制度,试图在中美之间重建经济、科技和意识形态的“柏林墙”,在两国人民之间散布敌意,甚至在两国之间挑起冲突。

中美关系的确处在一个前所未有的十字路口,美国一些人表现出要彻底毁掉建设性中美关系的强烈意图。中国要劝说那些人改弦更张是很难的,我们如何通过我方的行为来影响中美接下来的互动模式,不让那些极力想把美中两国引向“新冷战”的势力得逞,成为颇具挑战性的课题。

我们认为,首先要看清中美当前摩擦的领域和实际烈度。迄今为止,美国最激励的攻击发生在经济和意识形态领域。经济上主要打贸易战,同时有高科技“脱钩”的明显倾向。美方意识形态领域的表现尤其激进,攻击方式简单粗暴。

美国在军事上做的事情一是加快研制部署高技术装备,二是增强中国周边的基地网络建设,三是增加了在中国近海搞所谓“自由航行”挑衅的频度。

这些加在一起大幅改变了中美关系的面貌,让一种紧张的气氛在两国之间弥漫并日益浓烈。同时也要看到,美国这些行为造势的意义更大些。对华强硬在美国精英中已有相当共识,但强硬政策的目标到底是什么,仍有些含混不清。在贸易战到底是要多获得些好处还是要用它在战略上搞成压垮中国的问题上,美方也是有些患得患失的。

要看到,当年的美苏冷战也非一下子就成形的,而是在双方的激烈互动中不断加码,最终变得无法逆转。中美现在的情况与当年的美苏有本质的不同,这为双方不搞成相互斗狠的两国关系螺旋式下坠提供了可能性。

我们认为,美国当下总的来说不冷静,一些把持了权力或者有号召力的政治精英有点逞能。但是我们要有一个坚定的信念,把中美关系引向美苏那样的对抗不是他们就能做得了主的,只要中国对美挑衅采取得当的周旋策略,就能够做到既坚决维护我们国家的核心利益,又让那些人与中国“打冷战”的图谋落空。

这要求我们表现出足够的战略定力,在美方让人眼花缭乱的骚扰挑衅面前保持信心,准确评估那些骚扰对我方所能实际造成的损害程度。我们既要坚决回应美方的挑衅,又要就事论事,不主动扩大那些摩擦和冲突的意义,不推动具体事件产生全局影响。

中国要毫不动摇地继续扩大对外开放,包括对美国的开放,让这个进程与对美方挑衅开展反制相互协调起来,避免只顾其一不计其余。我们要相信,中国对外开放的战略取向有瓦解美方激进政策的长期效能,我们要有耐心等待这一作用的逐渐显现。

我们无需与美攀比向对方展示强硬姿态的气势,在韧度和弹性上超过美国,在谋略和回旋力的层面更胜美国一筹,应当成为中国社会与美周旋中的战略骄傲。让美国一些精英极力想要推动的冷战落空,让中国的发展在恶劣的美方态度面前继续保持如鱼得水的态势,有力前行,我们就将笑到最后。

中美关系的未来走向决不能掉入那些激进美国精英编写的剧本里,我们必须有卓越表现,让实际的中美关系跳出这个剧本,让人类的大国关系第一次彻底摆脱“修昔底德陷阱”。那将是中国的成就,也将是中美的共同成就,崛起的中国将因此无愧于整个人类的21世纪。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Ukraine: Why Washington Failed To End the Russian Ukrainian War

China: Trump’s ‘Opportunism First’ — Attacking Iran Opens Pandora’s Box

Germany: NATO Secretary-General Showers Trump with Praise: Seems Rutte Wanted To Keep the Emperor Happy

United Kingdom: Trump Is Angry with a World That Won’t Give Him Easy Deals

Topics

Turkey: Europe’s Quiet Surrender

Austria: Trump, the Bulldozer of NATO

     

Israel: In Washington, Netanyahu Must Prioritize Bringing Home Hostages before Iran

Ukraine: Why Washington Failed To End the Russian Ukrainian War

United Kingdom: Trump Is Angry with a World That Won’t Give Him Easy Deals

Nigeria: The Global Fallout of Trump’s Travel Bans

Australia: Donald Trump Just Won the Fight To Remake America in 3 Big Ways

Colombia: The Horsemen of the New Cold War

Related Articles

Mexico: Traditional Terrorism vs the New Variety

Austria: Trump, the Bulldozer of NATO

China: US Chip Restrictions Backfiring

Thailand: US-China Trade Truce Didn’t Solve Rare Earths Riddle

Sri Lanka: Pakistan’s Nobel Prize Nominee and War in Middle East