Will It Be or Not?

Published in El Financiero
(Mexico) on 6 December 2019
by Macario Schettino (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Nick Dauster. Edited by Helaine Schweitzer.
As I write, it does not seem very possible that the new trade treaty with the United States and Canada, known by the unfortunate name of USMCA, will be approved.*

It is well-known that Donald Trump initiated the renegotiation of NAFTA with the intention of reducing trade, which he doesn't like, although the agreement had the potential to address many issues that didn't exist during the 1992 negotiations but which are now relevant.

In the end, the agreement appears situated between two objectives: to bring provisions up to date and to put on the brakes. Canada and Mexico accepted the terms that were negotiated, although it remains clear that it will be more difficult to conduct trade in certain areas, specifically the automobile industry. I have the impression that this is precisely the issue that will most quickly become outdated because of the great transformation that the industry will be undergoing in the near future, but it is not possible to ask for too much given that Trump is involved.

The issue is that USMCA is stuck in the House of Representatives, which has a Democratic majority, and it is now mixed in with the impeachment inquiry, which House Speaker Nancy Pelosi formally launched yesterday. It is not easy to know how much impeachment proceedings will reduce or improve the prospects for the USMCA agreement.

On the other hand, AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka, who had assured people that the USMCA agreement would not be approved before Thanksgiving, has now raised several proposals that are unacceptable to Mexico, including the idea of verifying compliance with Mexican labor laws using United States inspectors working on Mexican soil.

The proposal to modify USMCA at the last moment is, in principle, an unacceptable tactic. The USMCA agreement was negotiated over many months, and its provisions should be approved or discarded without trying to obtain last-minute advantages. Nevertheless, that situation also occurred in 1993, when the United States managed to add a pair of agreements parallel to NAFTA (dealing with labor and the environment), in addition to concessions for specific representatives, in letters of intent or with additional accords. The current requests are greater, and for that reason, less likely to succeed.

We will know in a few days whether there will be a USMCA agreement or not. If it is not approved, we will continue with NAFTA, if Trump does not threaten to denounce it again. The United States is living through a period of conflict, and thus, I believe nothing should be considered impossible.

How does this affect us? Well, the approval of the USMCA agreement would establish a clear frame of reference, which should last for a number of years and facilitate business decisions. Without that, we remain in a state of limbo where NAFTA is in effect, but we don’t know for how long. Some industries see no deep differences between the two agreements, while others see disparity between the two agreements, as does the automobile industry, where the way of calculating the rules of origin is very different. Without the USMCA agreement, it remains in doubt whether changes will become effective, whether the agreement will be renegotiated under a different president, or whether NAFTA itself will be up for debate.

It is possible that the adoption of the USMCA agreement will facilitate a greater flow of foreign investment, but I wouldn't expect it to be very significant. The most important impact, it seems to me, will start in 2021, and there is a way to go before then. I believe it is inappropriate for Mexico to insist that the USMCA agreement will improve economic conditions. It is true that it will be of some help, but not that much.

So, with or without the USMCA agreement, the coming year will be complicated. The manufacturing industry in the U.S. continues to decline, we have not seen investment in our country recover, oil production has not increased, and the service sector has lost the momentum it had in previous years. I don't doubt that the Mexican government will blame the lack of the USMCA agreement for the poor start our economy will have in 2020. But don't be fooled.

*Editor’s note: The USMCA, or the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, an amended version of the new North American trade deal, was signed on Dec. 10, 2019.


Al momento de escribir estas líneas, no parece haber mucha posibilidad de que se apruebe el nuevo acuerdo comercial con Estados Unidos y Canadá, por mal nombre, TMEC. Como se sabe, la renegociación del NAFTA fue provocada por Donald Trump, en su ánimo de reducir el comercio, que no le gusta, aunque tenía la posibilidad de actualizar muchos temas que no existían en la negociación de 1992, y que hoy son relevantes.

Al final, el documento parece estar en medio de los dos objetivos: actualiza y frena. Canadá y México aceptaron lo negociado, aunque queda claro que será más difícil comerciar en algunos temas, específicamente industria automotriz. Tengo la impresión que ese tema, precisamente, será el que más rápido envejezca, por la gran transformación que vivirá esa industria en los próximos meses y años, pero teniendo enfrente a Donald Trump, no se puede pedir mucho.

El asunto es que el TMEC se quedó atorado por meses en la Cámara de Representantes, de mayoría demócrata, y hoy se mezcla con el proceso de destitución, que ayer fue anunciado formalmente por la presidenta de la cámara, Nancy Pelosi. Cuánto ese proceso reduce o amplía las posibilidades del TMEC, no es fácil saber.

Por otro lado, el líder de AFL-CIO, Richard Trumka, quien había asegurado que el TMEC no sería aprobado antes de Thanksgiving, ahora ha elevado varias peticiones inaceptables para México, incluyendo la idea de verificar el cumplimiento de las leyes laborales mexicanas con inspectores estadounidenses, operando en territorio nacional.

La intención de modificar el TMEC en los últimos momentos es una táctica inaceptable, en principio. Para eso se negoció por muchos meses, y lo que hay debe aprobarse o desecharse, sin querer ganar ventajas al cierre. Esto, sin embargo, ocurrió también en 1993, cuando Estados Unidos logró agregar un par de acuerdos paralelos al NAFTA (laboral y ambiental), además de concesiones a representantes específicos, en cartas de intención o arreglos adicionales. Ahora las peticiones son mucho mayores, y por lo mismo menos susceptibles de llegar a buen puerto.

En unos días más sabremos si hay o no TMEC. Si no se aprueba, seguiremos con NAFTA. Eso, si Trump no decide amenazar nuevamente con su denuncia. En el entorno de enfrentamiento que se vive en Estados Unidos, creo que nada debe calificarse de imposible.

¿Cómo nos afecta? Bueno, la aprobación del TMEC establecería un marco de referencia claro, que debería durar varios años, de forma que muchas empresas podrían tomar decisiones. Sin él, quedamos en un limbo en el que se aplica NAFTA, pero sin saber por cuánto tiempo. En algunas industrias no hay diferencia de fondo, pero en otras sí, como en automotriz, donde la forma de calcular el contenido nacional es muy diferente. Sin TMEC, quedaría en duda si para 2021 entraría en vigor, si podría ser renegociado (con un presidente distinto a Trump), o si de plano el mismo NAFTA se pone en duda.

Es posible que la aprobación del TMEC se refleje en un mayor flujo de inversión extranjera, pero no esperaría yo que muy significativo. El impacto más importante, me parece, sería a partir de 2021, y para eso falta un buen rato. Creo que la insistencia del gobierno mexicano de que con el TMEC habría mejores condiciones económicas ha sido inadecuada. De algo ayuda, sí, pero no tanto.

Así que, con o sin TMEC, el próximo año va a ser complicado. Sigue cayendo la industria manufacturera en Estados Unidos, seguimos sin recuperar la inversión en México, el petróleo no se deja, y los servicios ya perdieron el impulso que traían de los años previos. No dudo que el gobierno culpe a la falta de TMEC el mal arranque que tendrá nuestra economía en 2020. No se deje engañar.

This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Russia: Political Analyst Reveals the Real Reason behind US Tariffs*

Afghanistan: The Trump Problem

Israel: Trump’s National Security Adviser Forgot To Leave Personal Agenda at Home and Fell

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Topics

Israel: Trump’s National Security Adviser Forgot To Leave Personal Agenda at Home and Fell

Afghanistan: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Russia: Political Analyst Reveals the Real Reason behind US Tariffs*

Poland: Meloni in the White House. Has Trump Forgotten Poland?*

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats

Related Articles

Afghanistan: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Russia: Political Analyst Reveals the Real Reason behind US Tariffs*

Poland: Meloni in the White House. Has Trump Forgotten Poland?*

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats