America’s Anti-Trump Democrats Are Scattered

Published in Nihon Keizai Shimbun (Nikkei)
(Japan) on 12 February 2020
by Mikio Sugeno (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Eric Stimson. Edited by Helaine Schweitzer.
The first two primaries in the increasingly chaotic nomination struggle

There have been unexpected developments since the struggle for the Democratic presidential nomination began 10 days ago in Iowa. While presumed front-runner and former Vice President Joseph Biden dropped in the ranks despite his impressive achievements, 38-year-old rising star Pete Buttigieg and 78-year-old combatant Bernie Sanders split the victory in the first two contests after a bitter fight.

The Democratic Party primaries determine who will face Republican President Donald Trump in America’s November presidential election. There are many previous instances where the number of candidates has narrowed down prior to the New Hampshire primary. Instead, the level of turmoil has only increased.

On Feb. 11, at a voting precinct in Nashua, New Hampshire, a local resident named Elise Rosen, 64, tells me, “I spent a lot of time comparing the four men and women on the left and center, and three hours ago I went for Buttigieg. He’ll protect human rights and seek the truth. I thought he was serious about confronting global warming.”* Free-for-alls reveal this kind of voter confusion.

Ahead of Super Tuesday on March 3, when 14 states will collectively hold Democratic primaries to choose the presidential nominee, the competition will only get fiercer. The popular will can be seen playing out in two different ways.

First, there is the difference in values between the extreme left wing and the moderate forces. On Feb. 10, the day before the vote, Sanders, who has strong support among the young generation, turned his campaign rally into a performance by inviting a famous rock band. Each time he promised to cancel student loan debt or provide universal insurance with sizeable sources of revenue, the hall was enveloped in ripples of cheers. I could feel the fervor of an audience similar to those at Trump’s rallies.

The left wing’s determined candidates promote policies that tap into the young generation’s rage, while the centrists appeal to the sympathies of Republicans and independents. The gap continues to expand. The question arises as to whether the Democrats can preserve their unity even after a candidate is chosen.

The other way the popular will is playing out is that support is scattering among the moderate candidates, too.

Amy Klobuchar, a moderate female candidate, broke into the competition between Buttigieg and Sanders. Many of those who came to vote said that they chose her after witnessing her dignified debate performance on Feb. 7. She is being evaluated as the “sensible candidate” for her humanity, tolerance and accomplishments as a senator.

Support is also steadily building for Michael Bloomberg, a billionaire who is betting on the March collective primary day and who also projects a sense of stability. “Bloomberg’s name wasn’t on the ballot, so I went with another candidate.” I heard this a lot.

“We’ll win in Nevada and South Carolina.”* On the afternoon of the New Hampshire primary, Biden moved on to the southern state of South Carolina, where black votes are fundamental and where he is counting on a victory. The left-leaning Elizabeth Warren, who also fought a tough battle, shouted to her supporters, “We are just getting started!”

“Wouldn’t a big story be that I got more New Hampshire Primary Votes than any incumbent president, in either party, in the history of that Great State?” Trump tweeted. On Twitter, Trump showed off his high vote share in the Republican primary held concurrently with the Democratic one, as if he were merely an idle spectator.

There is unity around defeating Trump, but the candidates’ ideals and policies do not line up. Although the continuation of such a bitter contest will attract attention, the narrowing down of candidates who will not face the general election is late in coming. The U.S. Democratic Party is in a vexing position.

*Translator’s note: These quotes, while accurately translated, cannot be verified.


アイオワ州で指名争いが始まる10日前は想像もしない展開になった。豊富な実績で本命視されたバイデン前副大統領が下位に沈む一方、38歳の新星ブティジェッジ氏と78歳の闘士サンダース氏が序盤2戦で激戦の末に勝利を分け合った。

11月の米大統領選挙で共和党のトランプ大統領と対決する米民主党の指名候補争い。先例に従えば今回のニューハンプシャー州予備選挙までに一定の絞り込みが起きる例が多い。実際には混戦の度合いが深まった。

11日、ニューハンプシャー州ナシュア市の投票所。市内に住むエリーゼ・ローゼンさん(64)は「左派と中道の男女4人の候補を真剣に見比べて悩み、3時間前にブティジェッジ氏に決めた」と話す。「人権を守り真実を追求してくれる。地球温暖化に真剣に向き合う候補だと思った」。混戦にはこうした有権者の迷いがにじみ出ている。

本選への挑戦者を選ぶ民主の予備選は3月3日に14州で集中実施する「スーパーチューズデー」に向け、競り合いが激しくなる。その中で起きているのは民意の2つの「散らばり」だ。

ひとつは急進左派と中道勢力の価値観の開きだ。投票前日の10日。若者世代からの支持が厚いサンダース氏の選挙集会は有名ロックバンドを招いた一大ショーと化した。サンダース氏が学生ローンの債務棒引きや巨額の財源を要する国民皆保険の公約に言及するたびに会場内は大歓声のうねりに包まれる。トランプ大統領の選挙集会と似た聴衆の熱狂を感じる。

左派のブレない候補が若者世代の「怒り」に働きかける政策を前面に出し、中道派は共和党や無党派層に協調を呼び掛ける。差は拡大する一方だ。候補者を一本化しても民主党の結束が保てるのか、疑問が浮かぶ。

もう一つ、中道候補の間で起きている支持の分散がある。

ブティジェッジ氏、サンダース氏の競り合いに割り込んだのが中道の女性候補、クロブシャー氏だ。投票に来た多くの人が7日のテレビ討論会で堂々と弁論を発揮したシーンで支持を決めたと話した。人間的な包容力や上院議員としての実績から「穏健な候補」としての評価を上げた。

3月の予備選集中日にかける大富豪のブルームバーグ氏にも安定感に期待する支持がじわじわ集まっている。「投票用紙にブルームバーグ氏の名前がないので他の候補に入れた」。こんな複数の声を聞いた。

「ネバダとサウスカロライナで勝つ」。投票日の午後、黒人票の地盤がある南部サウスカロライナ州に移動し、次回以降に必勝を期するバイデン氏。苦戦する左派のウォーレン氏も「戦いはこれから」と支持者に呼び掛ける。

「現職大統領として最高の得票をした。でかい話ではないのか?」トランプ大統領は高みの見物を決め込むかのように、民主党と並行して実施した共和党予備選での高得票率をツイッターで誇示した。

「打倒トランプ」では一致するが、候補同士の理念や政策の道筋は折り合わない。激戦続きで注目は集めても、本選で勝てる候補の絞り込みは遅れる。米民主党は悩ましい立場にある。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Germany: Absolute Arbitrariness

Russia: Political Analyst Reveals the Real Reason behind US Tariffs*

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Switzerland: Donald Trump: 100 Days Already, but How Many Years?

     

Austria: Donald Trump Revives the Liberals in Canada

Topics

Mexico: EU: Concern for the Press

Austria: Musk, the Man of Scorched Earth

Germany: Cynicism, Incompetence and Megalomania

Switzerland: Donald Trump: 100 Days Already, but How Many Years?

     

Austria: Donald Trump Revives the Liberals in Canada

Germany: Absolute Arbitrariness

Israel: Trump’s National Security Adviser Forgot To Leave Personal Agenda at Home and Fell

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Related Articles

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats

Japan: US-Japan Defense Minister Summit: US-Japan Defense Chief Talks Strengthen Concerns about Single-Minded Focus on Strength

Russia: Trump’s Tariffs Slammed by Critics Who Forgot How To Stand Up for Their Own Citizens*

South Africa: The Oligarch Era: Is Democracy Finally Fighting Back in the Land of the Free?

Japan: Trump’s Tariffs Threaten To Repeat Historical Mistakes