You Can’t Fight the Coronavirus with Nationalism

Published in The Sankei News
(Japan) on 17 March 2020
by Hiroki Watanabe (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Eric Stimson. Edited by Helaine Schweitzer.
“We are at a critical time in the fight against the virus … I will never hesitate to take any necessary steps to protect the lives, health and safety of the American people. I will always put the well-being of America first.”

This statement is from a speech by President Donald Trump to American citizens on March 11, when he learned that the World Health Organization had declared the coronavirus a pandemic.

It brought to mind the words of President George W. Bush’s speaking from the White House on 9/11, following the coordinated terrorist attacks on the pillars of American society. “America and our friends and allies join with all those who want peace and security in the world, and we stand together to win the war against terrorism.”

Bush announced that terrorism was a common threat to the world. March 11 will likely be remembered as the day when the coronavirus pandemic was recognized as a global threat to lives, security and the economy.

The coronavirus has infected approximately 170,000 people in about 140 countries and regions around the world. “There is no race, nationality or creed. It is an indiscriminate threat,”* according to one international political scientist. There is a high risk that it will rage into Central and South America and Africa, where sanitation is inadequate.

Trump pointed out at the outset of his speech that the coronavirus pandemic “started in China.”

News about the coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan was covered by the authorities, and the massive economic sphere set up with China’s “One Belt, One Road” policy as leverage acted as a de facto transmitter. Tedros Adhanom, the director general of the World Health Organization, was under Chinese influence and lent his hand even though China had concealed the inadequacy of its early response, and it is fair to say that Adhanom was slow in sounding the alarm in the early stages.

We cannot forget that the strong country policy of the Xi Jinping regime, which strengthens its administration at home while pursuing hegemony abroad, is behind the spreading infection.

Trump emphasized that America had imposed entry bans against China from the very beginning and even criticized Europe, whose responses were slower, for spreading the infection in America through its travelers.

Trump’s confidence may be backed by national policy. In fact, a pandemic like this one was described in the 2017 National Security Strategy as a “biological [threat] on national security by taking lives, generating economic losses, and contributing to a loss of confidence in government institutions.”

But by sealing borders, the damage would surely be that Trump’s ideology of putting his own country first spreads around the world before the coronavirus.

America is tired of the fight against terror, and it is quitting the job of being the “world’s policeman” and turning inward. The fissures between America and its allies and friends born out of the trade war are impairing multilateral relationships, and the Group of 20 industrial and emerging-market nations and regions that coordinated the response to the Lehman shock has become dysfunctional. The pandemic has assaulted a leaderless “world without order.”

Trump’s speech announcing a one-sided entry ban against Europe invited a fierce reaction from several European countries, and New York markets suffered their worst crash since 1987. With the world in crisis, one country’s selfish action opens up a global wound.

Trump has also tweeted that “[w]e need the Wall more than ever!” Putting one’s country first is likely to spur other countries to close borders and ban travel. But using isolationism as a shield will only provoke fear of the virus and push the world into recession.

We should share tests and medical techniques and loan human resources, capital and goods first. There is no path to victory other than the world recovering the cooperation and solidarity it has lost.

*Editor’s note: This quotation, though accurately translated, could not be independently verified.


「われわれは、ウイルスとの戦いの重大なときにある…わたしは米国民の生命と健康、安全を守るために必要ないかなる手段を取ることも躊躇(ちゅうちょ)しない。いつも米国第一を大事にする」

 世界保健機関(WHO)が11日、新型コロナウイルスの感染拡大を「パンデミック(世界的な大流行)」と宣言したことを受け、トランプ米大統領が同日、国民に向けた演説の一節だ。

 思い出したのは2001年9月11日の米中枢同時テロの後、ブッシュ大統領が同じホワイトハウスでした演説だ。「米国と友好国、同盟国はテロとの戦いの勝利のために立ち上がる…」

 9・11はテロを世界共通の脅威と宣告した。この日は新たに、ウイルスの大流行が人命と安全、経済への世界的な脅威と認定した日と記憶されるだろう。

 新型コロナの感染者は世界の約140カ国・地域で約17万人。「人種、国籍、宗教の違いもない。極めて無差別な脅威だ」とある国際政治学者は語る。今後、保健衛生が脆弱(ぜいじゃく)な中南米やアフリカ諸国に猛威を振るう危険性は高い。

 新型コロナの大流行は「中国で始まった」とトランプ氏は演説の冒頭でくぎを刺した。

 武漢でのコロナ発生の情報は当局に隠蔽(いんぺい)され、「一帯一路」をテコに張り巡らせた巨大な経済勢力圏が事実上の媒介となった。中国の影響下にあったWHOのテドロス事務局長は、そうした中国の初期対応のまずさを封印するのに手を貸し、危険性に対する早期の警戒を遅らせたといえる。

 内には統制を強めて外には覇権を追求する習近平政権の強国路線が、感染拡大の背後にあったことを、忘れてはならない。

 トランプ氏の自信は、国家戦略に裏打ちされたものかもしれない。事実、今日のようなパンデミックを、17年の米国家安全保障戦略で「人命と経済の損失、政府機関の信任失墜をもたらす安全保障上の脅威」と位置付けてきたからだ。

 だが封じ込めの障害となるのは、トランプ氏が掲げる自国第一主義が、新型コロナより先に世界に蔓延(まんえん)したことではないか。

 テロとの戦いに疲れた米国は「世界の警察官」をやめて内向きのままだ。貿易戦争で生じた同盟国や友好国との亀裂は多国間の連携を後退させ、リーマン・ショックの際に協調行動を牽引(けんいん)した20カ国・地域(G20)は機能不全に陥った。リーダーが不在の「秩序なき世界」にパンデミックが襲ったのである。

 欧州からの入国停止を一方的に発表した演説は欧州諸国の激しい反発を招き、ニューヨーク市場は1987年以来の大暴落となった。世界的な危機において一国の身勝手な行動は全体の傷口を広げてしまう。

 トランプ氏は「米国にはかつてないほど壁が必要だ」とツイートもした。自国第一主義は各国が国境閉鎖や往来の禁止に走る原動力になろう。だが孤立主義を盾にすれば、ウイルスへの恐怖をあおって世界を不況に落ち込ませるだけだ。

 まずは治験と医療技術を共有し、人材や資金、物資を融通し合う。失われた協調と結束を世界が取り戻す以外、勝利の道はない。(外信部長兼論説委員)
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Topics

Poland: Meloni in the White House. Has Trump Forgotten Poland?*

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats

Mauritius: Could Trump Be Leading the World into Recession?

India: World in Flux: India Must See Bigger Trade Picture

Palestine: US vs. Ansarallah: Will Trump Launch a Ground War in Yemen for Israel?

Ukraine: Trump Faces Uneasy Choices on Russia’s War as His ‘Compromise Strategy’ Is Failing

Related Articles

Poland: Meloni in the White House. Has Trump Forgotten Poland?*

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats

Mauritius: Could Trump Be Leading the World into Recession?

India: World in Flux: India Must See Bigger Trade Picture

Previous article
Next article