Guns Are, But Flowers Are Not: Standards for Determining ‘Essential Business’ in the US

Published in Fuji News Network
(Japan) on 8 April 2020
by Tomoyuki Masuno (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Kelsey Lechner. Edited by Helaine Schweitzer.
What is “essential business?”

On April 7, Japan declared a state of emergency, calling on its citizens to stay at home absent an absolutely essential reason to go out. It also asked that indoor gyms and playgrounds, theaters and cinemas, and service-oriented restaurants and bars, such as high-end clubs, be temporarily closed.

Meanwhile, America is under lockdown as the novel coronavirus spreads, and only businesses deemed “essential for daily life” are allowed to still be open. This includes supermarkets offering delivery services for daily goods, hospitals and police services for emergencies, and the list goes on. If it were up to me, I would add bookstores and pubs, both personally “essential” to winding down from work and having a good time, but obviously, that’s neither here nor there for now. It’s a big decision just to step outside of the house, and America has been in lockdown for almost three weeks now.

Continuing Lockdowns in the US

Since California issued a stay-at-home order on March 19, New York and other states across the country have followed suit. Now almost all states are taking similar measures. Life has changed dramatically for people, and it’s almost hard to imagine what it was like just a month ago. The lockdown mainly determines which businesses are allowed to stay open and which are not based on how essential they are deemed for daily life. Examples from California are as follows:

Businesses allowed to operate (meaning they are deemed “essential”):

• Supermarkets and pharmacies
• Gas stations, laundromats, dry cleaners
• Police stations, fire stations, and government agencies
• Trains and buses
• News agencies
• Restaurants and cafes (to-go orders only)

Businesses forbidden to operate (meaning they are not deemed “essential”):

• Restaurants (for dining in)
• Bars and nightclubs
• Gyms
• Theaters and cinemas, etc.

The Penalty for Not Complying

America’s lockdowns are legally binding, so failure to comply can result in a penalty. In Los Angeles, a surfer was fined $1,000 for using a beach that had been closed, and cigarette and shoe stores that had been operating despite repeated warnings were penalized. However, a big question remains: what are the standards for determining which businesses are “essential” and which are not? The examples above, such as the supermarkets, pharmacies, and police and fire stations, are all considered to be “essential” across most of the U.S., and are therefore quite orthodox examples. Nevertheless, each region has its own understanding of what is “essential,” and there is some gray area depending on the industry. This often leads to confusion.

Guns are “essential” while flowers are not?

The COVID-19 outbreak saw a surge in gun sales across the U.S. There were roughly 3.7 million background checks for buyers conducted just in March alone.

California doesn’t specify whether gun dealerships are essential businesses (and therefore whether they’re allowed to stay open) during the lockdown, and as a result, gun dealerships are still operating with masses of customers despite the lockdown. One such store in the Los Angeles suburbs reported that it “used to have just a few groups come in one day; now, since the outbreak, we’ve had at most over 60 groups in just one day.”* Even though the main purpose of the lockdowns is to prevent people from coming into contact with each other, this intent is clearly being flouted, as large numbers of people congregate in small spaces and create dangerous situations. For this reason, the local police announced they would start cracking down on gun dealerships, saying that they are not “essential,” prompting an immediate legal challenge from the National Rifle Association, and the sales of guns were allowed.**

It’s easy to chalk this up to quintessential “Americanism,” but the owner of the aforementioned store actually responded that guns are “essential,” and that everyone coming to the store is concerned about personal security moving forward. The owner went on to explain, “If they don’t have guns, how are they going to protect themselves? It’s our right by law to arm ourselves,” emphasizing that the store will continue to operate while taking certain measures such as limiting the number of customers allowed to enter the store at one time.*

For reference, here are some other businesses allowed to operate based on their state:

• Cannabis dispensaries – California
• Golf courses (on the condition that players distance themselves from one another) – Missouri
• Hair and nail salons (later closed due to criticism) – Arizona
• Lawn maintenance services – Georgia
• Pawn shops – Nevada

There are more examples of decisions causing confusion. The east coast state of New Hampshire has deemed florists essential and allowed them to operate. When asked why, a spokesman for the state said that they provide essential services for funeral homes.

However, like guns, florists have not been categorized either way in California, and this has led to some problems. One florist in northern California, in business for almost 50 years, had to temporarily lay off two-thirds of its employees after the lockdown was announced and has limited their services to drop-off delivery. They were pressured into closing after a wave of angry emails and social media postings, accusing them of putting residents in danger and criticizing them for staying open while other stores closed.

When asked about it, the owner said with dismay that they were licensed agricultural producers, so they shouldn’t have faced any problems as the state classifies agriculture as "essential." They were taking precautions to protect their customers from physical contact during delivery as well.

However, in a complete turnaround in response to the situation, Yolo County, where the shop is located, made a unique decision to permit businesses that aren’t considered essential to still operate as delivery services. The florist was subsequently allowed to continue its delivery business.

Some store owners who have been affected by the gaps in the lockdown policy are advocating for all governments to be consistent in their rules. When asked if they believe flowers to be essential, one such owner responded positively, stating that flowers bring happiness, evoke emotion, and connect with the hearts of the recipients. I was shown a message in a letter that a customer very recently asked to be included with the delivery: “Happy birthday, Mom! I wish I could give these to you in person on your special day … I hope these flowers brighten your day and bring you joy!”*

The lockdown’s determination of “essential” and “non-essential” has been demarcating the light and dark sides of business. The first priority is stopping the spread of the pandemic, and it will not be easy to regain economic balance. Additionally, as long as citizens’ lives are restricted, the scope of what is considered “essential” will continue to widen as well.

Even in Japan, the national and Tokyo local governments faced difficulties in coordinating the temporary closure of facilities in preparation for a state of emergency, so the announcement to temporarily close facilities was delayed until April 10, when a request was made to close facilities as of that day. Osaka says that it will make a decision after carefully assessing the effects of social distancing, and five more prefectures, Kanagawa, Chiba, Saitama, Hyogo, and Fukuoka, are postponing their closure requests at this time. If there are differences in the decisions of local governments, there is a concern that it will cause confusion in the future, like in the United States. The administration is faced with the difficult task of determining what is “essential.”

*Editor’s note: Although accurately translated, the quoted remark could not be independently verified.

**Editor’s note: In March, the Los Angeles County Sheriff ordered gun shops to close. The NRA and other gun rights advocated brought a legal challenge, and in response, the Trump administration through the Department of Homeland Security issued an advisory that firearms dealers should be considered essential services and allowed to remain open.


銃はOK でも花はダメ? 非常事態のアメリカで営業が認められる「必要不可欠」の基準とは!?

「生活に必要不可欠な仕事」とは?

日本でも7日、緊急事態宣言が発令され、国民に不要不急な外出の自粛が呼びかけられた。これに伴い、屋内の運動施設や遊技場、劇場や映画館、高級クラブなど接客中心の飲食店などが休業要請の対象となっている。

新型コロナウイルスの感染拡大により外出禁止が続くアメリカでは、営業が認められるのは「生活に必要不可欠な」ビジネスだけだ。日々の食料を調達するスーパー、いざという時の病院・警察などなど、「日常生活に欠かせない仕事」を挙げればきりがない。自分の場合はそこに「書店」と「居酒屋」が加わるだろうか。どちらも自分にとっては、仕事を忘れひと時の楽しみを得る「生活に欠かせないもの」だった。だが当然今はそれどころではない。家の外に出るだけでも一大決心が必要だ。アメリカでの外出禁止生活も、もうすぐ3週間が経とうとしている。

全米で続く「外出禁止令」

3月19日、州として初めてカリフォルニアで「外出禁止令」が出されて以降、同様の動きはニューヨークなど全米に広がり、今やほとんどの州で同種の措置が取られている。人々の生活は1ヵ月前には想像も出来なかったほど一変してしまった。

「外出禁止令」では主に「営業を続けていいビジネスとダメなビジネス」が決められている。そしてこれらの判断基準となっているのが「生活に必要不可欠かどうか」ということだ。

例:カリフォルニア州の場合

「営業が認められるビジネス」=「生活に必要不可欠なビジネス」
●スーパー、薬局
●ガソリンスタンド、コインランドリー、クリーニング
●警察・消防・行政機関
●鉄道・バス
●報道機関
●レストランやカフェ(持ち帰りか配達のみ)     
など

「営業が禁止されているビジネス」=「生活に必要不可欠ではないビジネス」
●レストランの店内営業
●バーやナイトクラブ
●ジム
●劇場や映画館     
など

従わなければ罰則も

アメリカの外出禁止令には法的拘束力があり、従わなければ罰則を科されることがある。ロサンゼルス周辺でも、立ち入り禁止となったビーチで遊んでいたサーファーに1000ドルの罰金が科されたほか、度重なる警告を無視して営業を続けていたタバコ店や靴店などが摘発された。しかしどうしても疑問に思うのは「必要不可欠かどうかの基準は何なのか」ということだ。先に紹介したスーパー、薬局、警察消防といったものは全米ほぼ共通で「必要不可欠」とされるオーソドックスなものばかりだが、実は「必要不可欠かどうか」は地域によって判断が分かれる上、ルール上にはっきり明記されていない業種もあり、しばしば混乱を招いている。

銃は「必要」で花は「不要」?

コロナウィルスの感染拡大に伴い、全米で「銃」の販売数が急増している。購入時に行われる身元照会の件数が3月はおよそ370万件にものぼった。

こうした銃の販売店について、カリフォルニア州の外出禁止令には「必要不可欠かどうか」=「営業を続けていいのかどうか」が明記されていない。そのため、外出禁止令が出た後も銃の販売店は営業を続け、大勢の客が押し寄せた。ロサンゼルス近郊にある店に話を聞くと、「これまで1日数組ほどだった客の数が、感染拡大後には多い日で60組以上も訪れるようになった」という。そもそも外出禁止令の目的は「人と人が接する機会を減らすこと」であるから、それが全く守られていないばかりか、「狭い室内に人が密集する」危険な状況となってしまった。これには地元警察も「銃は必要不可欠ではない」として銃の販売店を取り締まると表明したのだが、すぐにNRA=全米ライフル協会などが猛反発。裁判沙汰となった挙句、結局、銃の販売は認められることとなった。

アメリカらしいといえばそれまでだが、先述の店のオーナーに聞くとやはり「銃は必要不可欠なものだ」と話す。そして「訪れる客は皆、今後の治安の悪化を懸念する人たちばかりだ」という。オーナーは「銃がなかったらどうやって身を守るんだ?武装するのは法に定められた権利だ」として店内に入る客の数を制限するなど対策を取った上で営業を続けていくと強調した。

参考:地域によっては営業が許可されたものの一例 
●大麻の販売店:カリフォルニア州
●ゴルフコース:ミズーリ州(人と人の距離を保つことが条件)
●ヘアサロンやネイルサロン:アリゾナ州 ※批判を受けその後禁止に
●芝生のメンテナンス業:ジョージア州
●質店:ネバダ州

混乱を招いた例は他にもある。東海岸・ニューハンプシャー州では「必要不可欠なもの」として「生花店」の営業が認められている。州の担当者が地元テレビ局に話したところでは「花は葬儀場に欠かせないから」だという。

一方、カリフォルニア州では、生花店については銃と同じく「営業していいのかどうか」が明記されていない。
カリフォルニア州北部でおよそ50年続く老舗の生花店でこんなことがあった。この店は外出禁止令が出された後、従業員の3分の2を一時解雇し、配達のみ営業を続けていたのだが、「他の店は休業しているのにおかしい」「住民を危険にさらして無責任だ」などと、メールやSNS上で猛バッシングを受け、営業休止に追い込まれてしまった。

取材に対し店のオーナーは「うちは元々農業生産者のライセンスを持ってやってきた。州の発表で農業は必要不可欠に分類されたから問題ないはずだし、そもそもお客さんと接触しないよう安全に配慮して配達していたのに・・」と戸惑いを隠せない。

しかし、こうした事態を受けて地元のヨロ郡が「必要不可欠とされていないビジネスも、配達であれば営業を許可する」という独自の決定を下したことで一転、店はなんとか配達営業を続けられることになった。
外出禁止令の盲点に振り回されてしまったオーナーは「全ての自治体でルールに一貫性があるべきだ」と訴える。

そんなオーナーに「花は必要不可欠なものだと思うか」と尋ねてみると、「もちろんです。花は幸せをもたらし、感情を動かします。花は受け取った人の心をつなげるものなんです」と言って、つい最近「配達する花に添えてほしい」と客から頼まれたという手紙の一文を教えてくれた。

「お母さん、お誕生日おめでとう!せっかくの特別な日に、直接手渡せたら良かったんだけど・・。この花がお母さんの一日を輝かせ、喜びをもたらしてくれることを願っています!」

「必要不可欠」の線引きが事業者の明暗を分ける外出禁止令。感染拡大を止めることが最優先ではあるが、経済面とのバランスを取るのは容易ではない。さらに、制限された生活が長引くほど市民が求める「必要不可欠」の範囲も広がっていく。

緊急事態宣言が出された日本でも、休業要請する施設について国と東京都の事前調整が難航し、発表が10日に先送りされた。大阪は外出自粛効果を見極めた上で判断するとしているほか、神奈川、千葉、埼玉、兵庫、福岡の5県は現時点で要請を見送るとしている。自治体の判断にバラツキが出れば、今後アメリカのような混乱を招く懸念がある。行政は「何が必要不可欠か」難しい判断を迫られている。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Japan: Reckless Government Usage of Military To Suppress Protests

Switzerland: Ukraine Is No Longer a Priority for America: Trump Leaves the Country High and Dry

Canada: Elbows Down on the Digital Services Tax

Germany: Trump’s Opportunity in Iran

Thailand: US-China Trade Truce Didn’t Solve Rare Earths Riddle

Topics

Germany: Trump’s Opportunity in Iran

Canada: Elbows Down on the Digital Services Tax

Thailand: US-China Trade Truce Didn’t Solve Rare Earths Riddle

Ireland: The Irish Times View on Trump vs the Fed: Rocky Times Ahead

Cuba: The Middle East Is on Fire

Australia: Could Donald Trump’s Power Struggle with Federal Reserve Create Next Financial Crisis?

Taiwan: After US Bombs Iranian Nuclear Facilities, Trump’s Credibility in Doubt

Switzerland: Ukraine Is No Longer a Priority for America: Trump Leaves the Country High and Dry

Related Articles

Canada: No, Joly, We Don’t Want America’s Far-Left Academic Refugees

Mexico: Trump and His Pyrrhic Victories

Japan: Trump’s 100 Days: A Future with No Visible Change So Far

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats