The US Is Carrying Out Preventative Military Operations Against China

Published in Taiwan Times
(Taiwan) on 10 May 2020
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Jennifer Sampson. Edited by Patricia Simoni.
The U.S. is strengthening its air and naval presence in the Pacific Ocean to push back against the expansion of Chinese military force and to challenge China on the nine-dash line.* Although China has not yielded, the U.S. has the advantage.

According to media reports, the U.S. Air Force sent supersonic bombers toward both the East China Sea and the South China Sea a few days ago, and yesterday, two of the same type of bombers were dispatched from the Bashi Channel and the Philippine Sea. This pincer movement, a military maneuver used to envelope an enemy from both sides, was meant to display the ability to rapidly and strategically deploy bombs. Including yesterday’s move, the U.S. military has deployed supersonic strategic bombers to the areas around Taiwan and the South China Sea for the fifth time in one week. This proves that the U.S. has not relaxed the military precautions it has taken in the Western Pacific during the pandemic; rather, it is strongly expressing a determination to safeguard the freedom of maritime navigation and making clear the intention to fight.

For the past several years, China has often dispatched bombers, fighter jets and reconnaissance aircraft in mixed formations to the Western Pacific. These long-distance flights have not only allowed pilots to become familiar with the routes and how to respond to possible conflict, but have been a chance for China to use photographs taken by official media that force the perspective to make it appear that Chinese fighter aircraft are passing by Taiwan. China then uses media distribution of these photos to strengthen deterrence and increase nationalist sentiment for a forceful reunification with Taiwan. Regarding its military intent, China has repeatedly sent bombers to circle Taiwan, primarily on drills to practice attacking important Taiwanese facilities and intervention of U.S. ships with long-range land attack cruise missiles or anti-ship missiles. A Xian H-6 bomber once approached the American strategic base on Guam, demonstrating the ability to attack it by air.

In recent years, the U.S. has deployed the majority of its naval fleet to the Pacific Ocean to counter China’s modernization of its navy and increasingly frequent long-range naval exercises. It has moved its newest aircraft carriers and fighter aircraft to military headquarters in the region and bolstered the presence, training and exercises of the Navy and Air Force. In addition, the U.S. has strengthened cooperation and conducted joint exercises with allies and navies in the Indo-Pacific region. In the future, the U.S. will increase the Navy’s scope, using new military technology to enhance the use of warships, aircraft and unmanned platforms. It will also be integrating new operational concepts to counter the expansion of China’s military power. Nevertheless, in the face of increasing military threat by the U.S. in the South China Sea and Taiwan Strait, China has not yielded. Due to a disparity in navy and air force military capabilities, however, China has chosen to keep a close eye on U.S. deterrence activities, causing the situation in the region to continue to escalate.

Over the past few years, since China enlarged the islands in the South China Sea, the U.S. has refused to acknowledge China’s claim to the artificial islands. Instead, it continues to challenge China on its nine-dash line, occasionally sending warships to the South China Sea to sail within 12 nautical miles of the islands, thereby underscoring the freedom of maritime navigation. Recently, the U.S. sent warships and destroyers, including the USS Theodore Roosevelt and USS America, through China’s artificial islands in the Paracel and Spratly Islands and the Zhongsha Islets. Sending strategic bombers through the South China Sea and the East China Sea is another example of the challenge. Since the beginning of this year, the U.S. has practiced counter exercises for scenarios in which China attacks Taiwan from the Taiwan Strait or blockades the South China Sea. The goal of these exercises is to prepare for possible and anticipated military conflict that might explode in the region and to maintain unimpeded international routes through the Taiwan Strait. In other words, the U.S. is carrying out preventive military operations. For example, a carrier battle group is being sent in advance to strengthen forward deployment. In addition, strategic bombers and nuclear submarines sent near the Western Pacific demonstrate the ability to deploy strategic nuclear strikes.

In an armed forces training mobilization order given at the beginning of this year, Xi Jinping called for military training for real situations and combat conditions. The recent strengthening of China’s military exercises around Taiwan reflect that call. In other words, China is using training to test combat plans on potential battlefields in order to respond effectively to conflict that may erupt. Even though the pandemic has restricted the training operations and military strength of the U.S. and China, the displays of battle strength by both countries highlight the objective disparity between the military might of each. Although nationalistic Chinese young people on the internet are clamoring about how now is the best time to forcefully reunify with Taiwan, objective strategists and policymakers are evaluating the situation and will not want to provoke conflict.

As a Chinese strategist recently wrote in the online article, “The Issue of Taiwan Concerns the Fate of the Nation and Cannot Be Approached Recklessly,” the predicament facing China in resolving the issue of Taiwan is that the U.S. military has the power to intervene. America’s military power, including carrier battle groups, strategic bombers, nuclear submarines and tactical cruise missiles for various launch platforms, is far superior to China’s. Although China could take advantage of the pandemic situation in the U.S., American armed forces have not fallen apart. Regardless, whether or not using force will get China out of this predicament, the real problems for China are international sanctions, Taiwan governance and an economic blockade by the U.S.

*Editor’s note: The “nine-dash line” refers to the undefined, vaguely located, & internationally-invalidated demarcation line used by the Republic of China and the People's Republic of China, for their claims to the major part of the South China Sea.


美國正對中國採取預防性軍事行動

美國在太平洋強化海空軍以對抗中國軍事武力的擴張,並挑戰中國九段線的主張,中國並未屈服,但美方還是佔盡優勢

根據媒體報導,美國空軍超音速轟炸機繼日前分別航向東海及南海之後,昨日同時派兩架同型轟炸機分別從巴士海峽及菲律賓海兩路飛向南海,以鉗形攻勢,展現快速戰略轟炸能力。連同昨日行動,短短一周內,美軍已經是第五次派遣超音速戰略轟炸機進入台灣及南海周邊海域。證明美國未因疫情放鬆對西太平洋軍事戒備,而是強烈表達捍衛海航行自由的決心,作戰意圖也非常明確。

中國過去數年常常派遣轟炸機、戰鬥機與電偵機混合編組飛行,在西太平洋區域進行遠海長航,除了讓飛行員熟悉航路及可能衝突的因應外,中國透過官方媒體拍攝「借位攝影」的照片,影射中國戰機經過台灣周邊,透過媒體傳播,強化威懾的意涵,藉此提高武力統一台灣的民族主義情緒。在軍事意圖方面,中國多次派遣轟炸機繞航台灣,主要演練以遠程攻陸巡弋飛彈或反艦巡弋飛彈,攻擊台灣重要設施及美國介入的船艦。轟六轟炸機曾接近美國戰略基地的關島,展示透過空中武力攻擊關島的能力。

近年來,為了對抗中國海軍現代化及日益頻繁的遠程航訓,美國將海軍多數艦隊部署在太平洋,將最新航艦及戰機部署太平洋司令部,強化海空軍的軍事存在、訓練和演習;另外,更與印度太平洋的盟國和其他海軍強化合作,進行聯合演訓。美國未來將增加海軍規模,以新軍事科技提升軍艦、飛機、無人載台的運用,融合於新的作戰概念,以對抗中國軍事武力的擴張。面對美國在南海及台海日益迫近的軍事脅迫,中國並未輕易屈服,在海空軍事能力落差下,對於美國嚇阻行動,中國採取緊迫盯人的態度,使區域情勢不斷升高。

過去數年,中國在南海擴建島礁之後,美國不承認人工島礁的合法權利,持續挑戰中國九段線的主張,時而派遣軍艦進入南海各島嶼十二浬以內,凸顯航行自由行動。近期美國派遣羅斯福號航空母艦、美利堅號兩棲戰鬥艦、驅逐艦等,在中國西沙、中沙及南沙擴建島礁進出,戰略轟炸機進出南海及東海,就是具體例子。從今年年初以來,為了因應可能爆發及預想的軍事衝突,維持台灣海峽國際航路暢通,演練中國在台海對台發動攻台,或封鎖南海後的可能反制行動。美國採取預防性軍事行動。如先期派遣航母打擊群強化戰力前進部署,另外,透過戰略轟炸機及核潛艦至西太平洋附近,展現戰略核打擊的能力。

中國近期強化在台灣周邊強化軍事演練在呼應年初習近平開訓動員令中有關「實戰化訓練」及「實案化訓練的要求。換言之,中國正在以訓練驗證可能戰場的作戰方案,以有效因應可能爆發的戰爭。即使因為疫情造成美中兩國訓練與戰力受限,雙方作戰實力展現凸顯兩國軍力客觀的落差。雖然中國網路憤青叫囂,現在是中國武統台灣最佳時機,理性客觀的戰略決策者衡諸戰略環境趨勢,不會希望挑起衝突。

正如同一位中國戰略專家近期網站發表《台灣問題攸關國運不可輕率急進》文章所言,中國解決台灣問題的困境之一就是美軍具有干預中國解決台灣問題的實力。美國軍事實力如航母打擊群、戰略轟炸機、核潛艦及不同載台戰術巡弋飛彈,都遠優於中國,雖因美國疫情,出現中國可趁之機,但美軍並未解體,不論使用武力勝負的戰略困境,如國際制裁、台灣治理、美國經貿封鎖才是中國難以解決的難題。

This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Topics

Poland: Meloni in the White House. Has Trump Forgotten Poland?*

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats

Mauritius: Could Trump Be Leading the World into Recession?

India: World in Flux: India Must See Bigger Trade Picture

Palestine: US vs. Ansarallah: Will Trump Launch a Ground War in Yemen for Israel?

Ukraine: Trump Faces Uneasy Choices on Russia’s War as His ‘Compromise Strategy’ Is Failing

Related Articles

Japan: US-Japan Defense Minister Summit: US-Japan Defense Chief Talks Strengthen Concerns about Single-Minded Focus on Strength

Taiwan: A Brief Look at Trump’s Global Profit Grab

Taiwan: Taipei Must Act To Soften Trade Blows

Taiwan: Trump Makes Another Bid

Taiwan: Leadership at a Challenging Time