US-China Trade War Heats Up

Published in China Times
(Taiwan) on 18 May 2020
by Da-Nian Liu (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Pinyu Hwang. Edited by Helaine Schweitzer.

 

 

Since the U.S.-China trade deal went into effect in February, mainland China has begun to fulfill its promise to treat foreign businesses the same way it treats domestic Chinese businesses, and to implement protections for intellectual property rights, strengthen foreign technology transfer policies, ease restrictions on foreign investment, and increase purchases from the U.S., all of which is causing President Donald Trump's approval ratings to reach a new high since taking office. Trump has even publicly praised China's proactive implementation of the trade agreement, although he has also called for China to fulfill its pledge to import $76.7 billion from the U.S. this year in time for the November election.

The new coronavirus hit the U.S. economy hard, with U.S. economic growth being only 0.3% in the first quarter and a possible double-digit recession predicted in the second quarter. More than 30 million people have applied for unemployment benefits, and the unemployment rate reached 14.7% in April. The epidemic has caused Trump's approval rating to drop, already causing him to fall behind Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden and further diluting any effects of the U.S.-China trade deal.

To deflect attention from criticism about the sluggish domestic economy, Trump has again lashed out against China, and economic friction between the U.S. and China are escalating once more. Trump has accused China of being the source of the coronavirus infection, and has declared that China must be punished and compensate the U.S. for losses, adding that he is considering imposing additional punitive tariffs on China. The United States is currently imposing tariffs on about two-thirds of China's imports, and in the future, in addition to raising tariff rates, the U.S. may also expand their scope. Trump has also carried out a full-scale siege on mainland China, demanding detailed assessments on whether foreign participation in the U.S. telecommunications industry poses national security risks, banning other countries from buying any 5G infrastructure equipment from Huawei, refusing to pay China the interest held on $1.1 trillion in U.S. public debt, and even vehemently advocating that China be limited in its sovereign immunity as a way to compensate for losses from the virus.

Although the United States and China have resumed communication and announced their intention to implement trade agreements to mitigate the antagonistic situation, Trump recently again declared a one-year extension of his executive order banning Huawei and ZTE telecommunications products, as he continued to expand the regulation of links in the supply chains of Chinese companies. Although China is unhappy with the United States’ approach of "appeasing with one hand while holding the sword in the other," there is nothing it can do.

With the economy not yet at rock bottom but with no recovery in sight, domestically, Trump is now pushing through a $2.2 trillion relief package, while internationally, he is playing the "China card" and toughening various measures against China. Both Trump and Biden are wrestling for authority in anti-China policies. Trump has accused Biden of leaning toward and having a soft stance on China. Only Trump can effectively keep China in check and bring industries back to America, as exemplified by the massive publicity surrounding TSMC's forthcoming investment in the United States. Biden, on the other hand, is working to distance himself from appearing to be pro-China, while at the same time charging that Trump's policy on China is hurting the U.S. economy. The fireworks between the two sides on the China issue is not expected to wane before the election.

Regardless of the outcome of the U.S. presidential election, long-term economic conflict between the U.S. and China is inevitable. The United States is unlikely to waive tariff increases on China until the U.S. and China have reached a phase-two trade agreement. Tariffs have become the most convenient tool for the U.S. to use against China. Under the constant threat of the U.S. raising tariffs on Chinese goods, the movement of Taiwanese businesses out of China will accelerate, changing the nature of the connections between cross-strait investment and the trade triangle between the United States, China, and Taiwan.

The author is the director of the Regional Development Study Center of the Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research.


美中經貿協議在2月生效後,中國大陸開始履行承諾,除了給予外商國民待遇,落實智財權保障,強化外商技術移轉機制,放寬外人投資限制,也增加對美國採購,使得美國川普總統的支持度在2月達到上任後新高。川普甚至公開讚揚中國積極落實美中經貿協議,不過川普也要求中國今年對美擴大進口的767億美元,可以在11月大選前到位。

新冠肺炎重創美國經濟,第1季經濟成長率只有0.3%,第2季可能會出現兩位數衰退;目前已經超過3000萬人申請失業救濟,4月失業率高達14.7%,疫情使得川普的支持率下降,已落後民主黨總統候選人拜登,更稀釋了美中經貿協議的成效。

為了轉移對國內經濟不振的批評,川普對中國又出重手,美中經貿摩擦再次升溫。川普除了指責中國大陸是新冠肺炎來源,必須接受懲罰並要補償美國損失,所以考慮對中國大陸再課徵懲罰關稅;美國目前仍對約2/3中國大陸進口產品課徵額外關稅,未來除了提高關稅稅率外,也可能擴大課稅範圍。川普也全面圍堵中國大陸,要求對外國參與美國電信業是否增加國家安全風險進行詳細評估,更禁止其他國家購買以華為為主的5G相關基礎設備,甚至有拒付中國持有美國1.1兆美元公債利息,以及剝奪中國主權豁免權以彌補損失的激烈主張。

美中高層雖然也重啟對話管道,宣示落實執行貿易協議以降低對立情勢。但川普最近又宣布將電信設備禁止採用華為、中興通訊產品的行政命令延長1年,持續擴大管制與中國企業供應鏈的連結。中國大陸雖然不滿美國這種「一手安撫,一手拿劍」的手法,但也無可奈何。

在經濟尚未探底,復甦遙遙無期下,川普目前對內推動近似撒錢2.2兆美元的紓困方案,對外則是主打中國牌,對中國的政策日趨嚴厲,川普與拜登都在力拚抗中政策的主導性。川普指責拜登傾中,對中國立場軟弱;只有川普可以有效制衡中國,並將產業帶回美國,大肆宣傳台積電將在美投資即是一例。而拜登則極力撇清親中印象,並指責川普的對中政策對美國經濟傷害很大,預估在選舉前雙方在中國議題上火力不會減弱。

不論美國總統大選結果如何,美中經貿長期對抗趨勢已不可免。在美中達成第二階段經貿協議之前,美國不太可能免除對中國加徵關稅,關稅成為美國制衡中國最方便的工具,在美國隨時可能提高關稅的威脅下,會加速台商移出中國,改變兩岸投資及美中台三角貿易的連結。

(作者為中華經濟研究院區域發展研究中心主任)
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Cuba: The Middle East Is on Fire

Poland: Calm in Iran Doesn’t Mean Peace Yet

United Kingdom: Trump Is Angry with a World That Won’t Give Him Easy Deals

Ireland: The Irish Times View on Trump vs the Fed: Rocky Times Ahead

Switzerland: Ukraine Is No Longer a Priority for America: Trump Leaves the Country High and Dry

Topics

Turkey: Europe’s Quiet Surrender

Austria: Trump, the Bulldozer of NATO

     

Israel: In Washington, Netanyahu Must Prioritize Bringing Home Hostages before Iran

Ukraine: Why Washington Failed To End the Russian Ukrainian War

United Kingdom: Trump Is Angry with a World That Won’t Give Him Easy Deals

Nigeria: The Global Fallout of Trump’s Travel Bans

Australia: Donald Trump Just Won the Fight To Remake America in 3 Big Ways

Colombia: The Horsemen of the New Cold War

Related Articles

Turkey: Europe’s Quiet Surrender

Mexico: Traditional Terrorism vs the New Variety

Austria: Trump, the Bulldozer of NATO

Israel: In Washington, Netanyahu Must Prioritize Bringing Home Hostages before Iran

Ukraine: Why Washington Failed To End the Russian Ukrainian War