Transitional Justice or Cancel Culture?

Published in UDN
(Taiwan) on 02 July 2020
by Tsu-Han Fang (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Jennifer Sampson. Edited by Jamye Sharp.
This past June, a memorial to the founder of the Washington Redskins was removed from the Robert F. Kennedy Memorial Stadium in Washington D.C. A historical landmark, RFK Stadium was originally home to the Redskins football team and also used by the Washington Nationals baseball team when they had first become a team.

The memorial, which honored George Preston Marshall, the founder and former owner of the Redskins, was removed because of Marshall’s terrible behavior in the past. He was a segregationist who refused to hire African American players and even stipulatedyy in his will that none of his assets should go to schools that were not all white. Moreover, he decided upon the team’s name, Redskins, which is discriminatory to Native Americans.

Coincidentally, around the same time, the Minnesota Twins baseball team removed a statue of their former owner, Calvin Griffith, from their ballpark. In a statement, the team said, “[w]e cannot remain silent and continue ignoring the racist comments he made … ” Griffith thought Minnesota was a great place because “you've got good, hard-working, white people here.” He also said, “I'll tell you why [the team] came to Minnesota. It was when I found out you only had 15,000 blacks here.”

In the current racial equality movement, the commotion of reexamining history is reaching every corner of the U.S. On the streets and in college campuses, many buildings are being renamed and monuments are being removed. Because of what they represent, memorials and symbols are being removed — from statues of Southern leaders who fought for slavery during the Civil War, to racist symbols like the Confederate flag, and even statues of former presidents who were white supremacists. Germany has no monument to Hitler, only places to commemorate the victims of Nazis, why do we need statues of racists? That’s the question that those confronting the validity of the destruction of history and supporting the removal of the statues are asking.

So Princeton University severed ties with one of its past presidents, former U.S. President Woodrow Wilson, Los Angeles is considering changing the name of the John Wayne Airport, the American Museum of Natural History will remove the statue of Theodore Roosevelt. People leave traces wherever they go, and now their wrong words and behavior are readily found with an internet search. Like a snowball rolling down a hill, equal rights activists are finding their targets quickly on social media, gradually removing the dark stains on this era.

But where is the line drawn?

After the legendary and well-loved Los Angeles Dodgers sportscaster Vin Scully expressed his anger at football players kneeling in protest three years ago; hsome labeled him a racist. Now the media is even calling for fans to condemn him, despite his undoubted support for African American players over his more than 60 years of sportscasting. Those in this “cancel culture” throw around controversial labels to encourage people to withdraw support. This is the biggest impediment to the current social movement.

Judging by today’s standards, Indian sage Mahatma Gandhi might have been a racist full of prejudice. Former President of National Taiwan University, Fu Ssu-nien seemingly did not do enough for democracy on campus. One of the Founding Fathers of America, George Washington, had a huge family business that is tainted by his role in slavery. Each era has its own context, and everyone grows up in a different environment. Judging the past from a single point of view is not only unfair, but dangerous: it leads people to easily slip into a frenzy of a cultural revolution, turning everything into a fight.

In an interview with The Washington Post, the granddaughter of the Redskins’ former owner surprisingly said she felt his memorial should’ve been taken down and the Redskins name should be immediately changed. Furthermore, regardless of the prejudiced things he recorded in his will, scholarships provided by the family foundation should be given equally to recipients of all races. Just like the Marshall family, the most important thing for society after the dust settles is the progress made by each generation. After all, the most difficult thing to remove is the prejudice and bias in everyone’s heart.

The author is a sports writer.


方祖涵/轉型正義還是取消文化?

在美國首府甘迺迪球場,六月中把創辦人紀念牌匾拆掉了。甘迺迪球場,原是美式足球紅人隊主場,華盛頓國民隊剛成軍時也用過,是個充滿歷史故事的地標。

球場牌匾被拆除原因,是促成興建的前紅人隊老闆普雷斯頓.馬歇爾昔日糟糕言行──他是種族分離主義者,曾經堅拒雇用非裔球員,甚至連遺囑都特別寫到絕對不能有絲毫財產流入非白人專屬學校,紅人隊名 印地安族裔,也是在馬歇爾手中定案。

無獨有偶的,明尼蘇達雙城隊同時間移除了前老闆凱文.葛瑞菲斯球場銅像。「我們不能再對他的種族言論沉默」,球隊發表聲明說。葛瑞菲斯認為明尼蘇達是好地方,因為那裡都是「熱愛工作白種好人」,還說「當我發現明尼安納波里斯只有一萬五千個黑人的時候,立刻就決定把球隊搬過來了」。

在種族平權運動風潮之下,全美重新檢視歷史聲浪席捲每個角落。從街頭到校園許多建築被更名,許多銅像牌匾被拆除,不管是南北戰爭時期主張蓄奴的南方領袖、象徵種族主義的邦聯旗幟,甚或是堅信白人至上的昔日總統,這些人物與符號因為代表的意義被取下了。「德國沒有希特勒紀念碑,只有紀念納粹受害者的地方,為什麼我們需要種族主義者銅像?」面對破壞歷史質疑,主張拆除的人們是這樣說的。

於是普林斯頓大學跟前總統兼校長威爾遜劃清關係、洛杉磯考慮把約翰.韋恩機場名字改掉、紐約自然博物館羅斯福雕像要被移除…凡走過必留下痕跡,人們往昔錯誤言行在網路搜尋下無所遁形,如同滾雪球一般,平權運動者藉著社群媒體快速串聯鎖定對象,逐步清理時代的黑暗印記。

可是,界線到底該劃在哪裡呢?

深受球迷喜愛的道奇隊傳奇播報員史考利,三年前對美式足球員跪膝抗議表示憤怒,這段談話讓他被一些人冠上種族主義者標籤,現在甚至有媒體呼籲球迷譴責。姑且不論史考利六十幾年播報生涯對非裔球員支持無庸置疑,光是這種輕易用爭議標籤鼓動大眾收回支持與喜好的「取消文化」,正是當下社會運動最大瓶頸。

用現在標準來看,印度聖雄甘地可能是充滿歧視的種族主義者,台大校長傅斯年似乎對校園民主貢獻不夠,美國國父華盛頓家業龐大,更難洗脫蓄奴惡名。然而每個時代都有不同背景,每個人都有相異的生存環境,用單一角度評斷過去既不公平又危險,更容易讓公眾陷入文革瘋狂,把所有事情都變成鬥爭大會。

後來,華盛頓郵報訪問紅人隊前老闆孫女,沒想到她說祖父牌匾本來就該拆了,紅人隊應立刻改名,而且不管那份充滿偏見的遺囑怎麼說,家族基金會獎學金早就對族裔一視同仁。就跟馬歇爾家族一樣,對社會來說,在一切塵埃落定後,最重要還是世代觀念持續進步。畢竟最難拆除的,是每個人心裡的歧視與偏見。

(作者為運動文學作家)
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Germany: Absolute Arbitrariness

Venezuela: Vietnam: An Outlet for China

Russia: Political Analyst Reveals the Real Reason behind US Tariffs*

Israel: Trump’s National Security Adviser Forgot To Leave Personal Agenda at Home and Fell

Topics

Germany: Absolute Arbitrariness

Israel: Trump’s National Security Adviser Forgot To Leave Personal Agenda at Home and Fell

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Venezuela: Vietnam: An Outlet for China

Russia: Political Analyst Reveals the Real Reason behind US Tariffs*

Poland: Meloni in the White House. Has Trump Forgotten Poland?*

Related Articles

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Japan: US-Japan Defense Minister Summit: US-Japan Defense Chief Talks Strengthen Concerns about Single-Minded Focus on Strength

Taiwan: A Brief Look at Trump’s Global Profit Grab

Taiwan: Taipei Must Act To Soften Trade Blows

Taiwan: Trump Makes Another Bid