The Attack on TikTok: 1 of the Ugliest American Dramas

Published in Huanqiu
(China) on 03 August 2020
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Tyler Ruzicka. Edited by Helaine Schweitzer.
TikTok's future in the United States is hanging by a thread. On Friday, Donald Trump said that he would ban TikTok in the U.S. as early as Saturday. Although he did not do so, the threat added pressure to rumored discussions between TikTok's parent company, ByteDance, and Microsoft, making it very difficult for ByteDance to try to retain any shares in the business or negotiate for a higher selling price.

Without a doubt, this is a collaborative effort between the U.S. government and tech companies to hunt down TikTok and seize its assets. National security, at least in a narrow sense, is certainly not the United States' main concern here; instead, what truly worries Washington is that Huawei and TikTok have demonstrated the ability to challenge the United States' domination of the high-tech information industry. If we consider that to be a part of national security, too, then we are saying that U.S. national security and American hegemony are one and the same.

There is no justification here; we have seen the ugly side of the U.S. government and tech industry leaders. The company that is most threatened by TikTok is Facebook, whose CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, has become one of the most open and radical advocates calling on the U.S. tech sector to get rid of the company. Originally, in order to bring Facebook to the Chinese market, Zuckerberg did his best to curry favor with China. Now he has changed his tune entirely. When the CEOs of three other U.S. internet giants declined to confirm that China had stolen American technology, he openly declared that it was "well-documented" that the Chinese had done so. He cast aside morality and justice for the sake of profit, and showed people the true face of American capitalism.

In addition, many of TikTok's users are young Americans, many of whom dislike President Trump. In June, a group of them reduced attendance at Trump's Tulsa election rally by purchasing tickets ahead of time and intentionally staying home. Many analysts believe that shutting down TikTok before the election is attractive to the president's campaign team.

China has never banned U.S. tech companies from doing business in China. It has simply required that their actions in China comply with Chinese law, nothing more. U.S. companies refused to cooperate with Chinese regulations. Google once had a foothold in the Chinese market; it left on its own 10 years ago. When other companies independently developed versions of their products to suit the Chinese market, they were accused of bowing to China and met with resistance. As a result, none of the big U.S. internet companies have substantial operations in China at the moment.

Within the United States, TikTok operates in full compliance with U.S. law, and is fully separate from Douyin.* Even if mainland Chinese users bypass the great firewall, they are unable to register for TikTok. That is to say, TikTok has not violated any U.S. regulations, and has fully complied with American management. The U.S. assertion that TikTok poses a threat to its national security is pure speculation and a groundless accusation, just like speculation that Huawei collects intelligence for the Chinese government. This is fundamentally different from China's refusal to allow Facebook and Twitter's original versions to be used in China, and its requests that Facebook and Twitter introduce operation modes that conform to Chinese laws for use within China.

China is genuinely protecting its national security in the traditional sense. China's internet is governed by rule of law; it is only logical that we ask that American companies save Chinese user information on servers located within China, and that they manage content on their platforms in accordance with Chinese law. The U.S. wants to ban TikTok, but what U.S. law has the company violated? In what way has it not complied with U.S. management? What just cause or reason can the U.S. show for wanting to pull TikTok up by the roots?

This is the brutal undertaking of a rogue government, another act put on by Washington to uphold American hegemony. The true nature of hunting down TikTok that we're seeing today is the forcible protection of hegemony as national security, and the overstepping of laws and business regulations in the process.

The U.S. is using extremely brutal methods to try to solidify its position at the absolute center of the technological world order. Whether it kills TikTok, or snatches it away from ByteDance, this has been one of the ugliest productions within the high-tech competitive sphere of the 21st century.

*Editor’s note: TikTok and Douyin are Chinese video-sharing social networking services owned by ByteDance. Douyin is a Chinese version of the dance video app.


TikTok在美国已经命悬一线。特朗普星期五表示,最快可能于当地时间星期六就禁掉TikTok,尽管他星期六没那么做,这给传闻中的TikTok母公司字节跳动与微软的谈判增加了更大压力,令字节跳动想继续持有一点股份或者多卖一点价钱都变得十分困难。

这无疑是美国政府与高科技公司联手对TikTok的围猎和巧取豪夺。狭义的国家安全肯定不是美方的最重要考虑,华为和TikTok所展现出的挑战美国高科技信息产业霸权的能力才是真正让华盛顿心神不宁的。如果说这也是国家安全,那么美国的国家安全就是与霸权画等号的。

这里没有什么道理可讲,我们只是看到了从美国政府到相关高科技巨头所表现出的丑陋。受到TikTok最大冲击的是脸书公司,它的CEO扎克伯格成为了美国科技界要搞掉TikTok的最公开、最激进的推手。扎克伯克当初为了让脸书进入中国市场,曾极力讨好中方,如今他完全换了一张脸,在美国其他3家互联网巨头的CEO拒绝证实中方盗窃美国技术的时候,他公然宣称自己“有充分证据”中方那样干了。此人为了利益而将道义撇至一边的表现让人看到了美国资本的真实嘴脸。


另外,TikTok的用户主要是美国青少年,他们中的很多人不喜欢特朗普总统。6月份他们中的一个群体通过预订门票而故意不去使得特朗普在塔尔萨市的竞选集会出现冷落,很多分析相信,在大选前关掉TikTok对总统团队是一件有吸引力的事情。

中国从来没有禁止美国高科技公司来华开展业务。中方要求的是他们在中国做的事情要符合中国法律,仅此而已。是美国那些公司拒绝配合中国的法律规定。谷歌曾在中国市场上占有一席之地,是它自己在10年前退出了,其他公司单独设计适合中国市场的版本在美国遭到了反对,被扣上“向中国磕头”的罪名,致使美国网络巨头目前都没有在中国实质运营。

TikTok是完全按照美国法律在美运营的,它与抖音存在彻底的隔绝。中国大陆的用户即使翻墙也无法注册TikTok。也就是说,TikTok没有违反美国任何一条法律,完全配合了美方的管理。美方宣称它威胁到自己的国家安全,这是地地道道的假设,是莫须有的罪名,与假设华为为中国政府搜集情报如出一辙。这与中国不同意脸书、推特原版进入中国,要求它们推出符合中国法律的运营方式来华登陆有着本质的区别。

中国是真正在维护传统意义上的国家安全。我们要求美国的公司把中国用户信息储存在位于中国的服务器上,要求它们对平台上发布的内容做符合中国法律的管理,这是中国依法治网的必然逻辑。美国要禁TikTok,请问这家公司触犯了美国的哪条法律?它又不配合了美国的哪项管理?美方欲将TikTok连根拔除,又有什么样的公理和道义能够真正摆到桌面上来呢?

这就是一个流氓政府的野蛮出手,是华盛顿为维护美国霸权又一次上演的黑暗一幕。把霸权当成国家安全进行超越法律和商业规则的强制保护,这就是我们今天所看到的针对TikTok围猎的本质。

美国在以极其野蛮的方式试图固化以它为绝对中心的世界高科技秩序。无论它最终将TikTok“杀掉”,还是把这个孩子从字节跳动的怀里强行夺走,这都是21世纪在高科技竞争领域最丑陋的剧目之一。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Germany: Absolute Arbitrariness

Russia: Political Analyst Reveals the Real Reason behind US Tariffs*

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Israel: Trump’s National Security Adviser Forgot To Leave Personal Agenda at Home and Fell

Austria: Donald Trump Revives the Liberals in Canada

Topics

Austria: Donald Trump Revives the Liberals in Canada

Germany: Absolute Arbitrariness

Israel: Trump’s National Security Adviser Forgot To Leave Personal Agenda at Home and Fell

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Venezuela: Vietnam: An Outlet for China

Russia: Political Analyst Reveals the Real Reason behind US Tariffs*

Related Articles

Austria: Donald Trump Revives the Liberals in Canada

Germany: Absolute Arbitrariness

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Venezuela: Vietnam: An Outlet for China