Biden Faces an Enormous Question: How Do You Heal a Nation?

Published in Zetland
(Denmark) on 17 January 2021
by Andreas Thorsen (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Samantha Darcy. Edited by Elizabeth Cosgriff.
The future president has been given a difficult task. But he can find the inspiration to solve it in the history of his country.

At 8 a.m. Sunday in Washington, a pickup truck was parked neatly on Vermont Street, which leads downtown to the White House and the Senate. The car was adorned with signs and slogans. “Why this ridiculous coverup?” said a sign in the window, “it’s crazy.” Missing person flyers with photos of children who were supposedly kidnapped by the satanic, pedophilic elite that are working secretly to achieve world domination, also hung on the car.

“HELP!” was written in large, white letters along one of the car doors. But apparently the help failed to materialize. The car’s owner was obviously among the believers of the conspiracy theories of QAnon, which helped ignite the mob that stormed the U.S. Congress on Jan. 6. Up until the last Sunday before Joe Biden’s inauguration, QAnon believers and other hard-core Donald Trump supporters dreamt about a successful repeat of the onslaught. Flyers advertising a “Million Militia March” abounded, calling people to show up armed.

But in the interim, another powerful faction of American society had taken over the capital. Less than 100 yards from the parked QAnon-decorated vehicle, parked across Vermont Street, was a camouflaged military truck, behind which stood a wall of concrete blocks — and beyond those was an unscalable fence, and behind the fencing waited a group of police officers. Closer to the main government buildings were more walls, more fences and 25,000 waiting soldiers. More than are currently stationed in Afghanistan and Iraq combined. Even Dunkin’ Donuts had surrendered and shut its doors.

In other words, the American police and military succeeded in preventing angered citizens from triggering violent conflict in the streets of Washington and the United States’ other centers of power. This time, those responsible for keeping the peace were prepared, and all conflict was averted.

In the time to come, Biden’s ambition is to achieve the exact same result, only with a larger goal than just Washington, D.C. Now it’s time to tackle the whole of the United States.

On Saturday, Nov. 7 — the day it became certain Biden had secured the United States’ presidential election — he gave a speech in Wilmington, the largest city in his home state of Delaware. He talked about it being time to listen again, and to put away harsh rhetoric. That it was time to see his political opponents as just that, and not as the enemy. The new president-elect, as they call it in the States, set an inclusive tone.

Biden’s ambition to reunite the United States has been his basic message in the months since the Wilmington speech. Again and again he has said he wishes to be president of all Americans, including the millions that would rather see Trump in office for another four years. He has repeatedly said that it is time to heal America.

But that may well be difficult.

On Wednesday, Jan. 6, the U.S. Congress building in Washington, D.C., was overrun by hundreds of furious Trump supporters who, encouraged by their defeated president and large parts of the Republican Party, rejected Biden’s electoral victory. The world watched in astonishment as men and women dressed for battle forced congressmen, congresswomen, and even Vice President Mike Pence, to hide. Five people, including one police officer, lost their lives. The riots brought together several fringe groups in American society who had been withdrawing from their communities and into the internet, into extremist media and into a parallel reality. Meanwhile, Biden’s own party is bringing charges against Trump, accusing him of inciting the attack on Congress, and there are those who believe that although there is a need for both a spiritual and legal reckoning for the president, a legal fight will only further divide the American people from one another.

Biden faces an enormous question: How does one heal a country?

Exactly one week before Biden is formally inaugurated, I call Alan Steinberg. A retired political science professor at Monmouth University in New Jersey, he’s also a former senior official in the George W. Bush administration, a lifetime Republican, and now a political commentator. He’d rather speak with the video feature turned on, he says, under a driving cap and a pair of very bushy eyebrows, as we connect.

“I can see myself, and I can see a photo of you,” he laughs. “You’re much better looking than I am, that’s why I’d rather look at you.”

Steinberg is worried for his country. But there are bright spots.

“I think Biden’s gonna be a very good president,” he says. “I think he’s exactly what America needs right now. But I am concerned — I think that the Trumpian Republicans are authoritarian. I think that authoritarianism and fascism [have] really made tremendous gains, as has racism, in the Republican Party.”

Steinberg is a fierce critic of Trump’s Republican Party. He publishes columns and essays in American magazines and sends newsletters to all of his old Republican friends. Some of them he loses, others stick around. He talks about how Liz Cheney, a powerful member of the House of Representatives and daughter of former Vice President Dick Cheney, has broken from the president in connection with the current impeachment by Congress. He’s happy about it — he’s known the Cheney family almost forever, and it gives him hope that the old Republican Party still exists somewhere in there.

“The new, what they call conservatism, it is not conservatism, it is authoritarianism, it is racist. So while I think we will triumph, I remain very concerned.”

On Jan. 6, Steinberg sat glued to his television.

“I was terrified,” he said, “because I didn’t see — I saw where this riot was out of control, and I know how these insurrectionists think. I know how they think. And they have no conscience. These are evil people, every one of them. American democracy means a great deal to me, I’m a grandson of immigrants, my immigrant grandparents came to this country, treasured America, treasured the right to vote, treasured the rule of law. These people are not for the rule of law, these people have adopted American fascism as their credo, and that’s the exact right word for it. American fascism.”

The Democrats in the House of Representatives have now, along with 10 Republicans, including Cheney, moved to impeach the president. This is the second time in as many years that he has been in this situation, most recently in the fall of 2019, when he stood accused of abusing his power to pressure Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate then-presidential candidate Biden and his son, Hunter Biden, for criminal activities. This time, he is accused of inciting those of his supporters who committed insurrection on Jan. 6 to “walk down to the Capitol,” as he said at a rally that morning, “and I will be there with you. We're going to walk down. Anyone you want, but I think right here, we're going to walk down to the Capitol — and we're going to cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and -women and we're probably not going to be cheering so much for some of them. Because you'll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength and you have to be strong.”

In the following days, Biden was so subdued that everyone could hear it. Biden largely kept his thoughts on Congress’ actions to himself, instead talking about combating the ongoing pandemic and economic crisis. He has spoken with Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell, who denounced Trump on the day of the riots, about the possibility of a Senate trial running alongside the Senate’s usual work. That would make sense because the pandemic demands that Biden’s administration hit the ground running, and all new Cabinet members must be approved by the Senate.

There are many different views on Biden's restraint in regard to the potential trial of his predecessor.

On the one hand, there are those who believe that Biden must take the lead in a showdown with the president. That the United States cannot move forward until Trump and Trumpism are defeated. On the other hand, there are those who believe a Senate trial with less than a week left of Trump’s presidency is, first of all, not worth the hassle and is, second of all, just an expression of the left's desire for revenge.

Steinberg’s views are somewhere in the middle.

“As long as [Biden’s] not identified as the instigator of it all, I don’t think it will hurt. I think he’s handling it exactly right. He’s a man of the Senate, Biden; that has to be understood. He never wants to appear to be interfering with Senate prerogatives. But at the same time, he doesn’t want to tell the Senate not to do it. [...] I think he is threading the needle exactly right on this.”

Like many other political thinkers and observers in the United States, however, Steinberg also has an attitude toward the Senate trial that speaks of something greater than Cabinet appointments, inconvenience, revenge and respect for the Senate’s work. The view is that a Senate trial would go against the fulfillment of Biden’s stated goal: to heal America.

(Sixty-four percent of Americans believe Biden has done well since winning the election in November. Sixty-eight percent believe that Donald Trump should never again hold a role in American politics.)

It has to do with what Biden is tasked with healing. There is not just one America anymore — in fact, one might say there are three. There is the blue America, the Democratic America, that has taken control of both the White House and the two houses of Congress, and which also enjoys great influence in the American mainstream media and big tech. There is the red America, the Republican America, which is weak politically, but still has Fox News and The Wall Street Journal on its side, just as they have financial backing from important conservative donors in business. Finally, there is Trump America, which seems to be moving further and further away from the reality of the others. As large sections of the far right were banned from Facebook, Twitter and YouTube in the days following Jan. 6, the market for fringe social media grew tremendously. Downloads of encrypted messaging apps like Telegram and Signal multiplied. Trump’s America has gone underground.

How does Biden avoid pushing this third group even further away? Steinberg has a suggestion, and it involves a balancing act. To explain what he means, he looks back to the American crisis in recent history reminiscent of the one we now face. Namely, Watergate.

Back in 1974, President Richard Nixon resigned as a result of the Watergate scandal. He faced, as Trump now does again, a trial on articles of impeachment. Nixon’s then-vice president, Gerald Ford, took over the White House. In his inauguration speech, he spoke of how the “long national nightmare is over,” words that are famous in the United States. Ford faced a task that parallels Biden’s today, and his ambition was the same. He wanted to heal.

One of the first things Ford did after his famous inauguration speech became one of the most controversial decisions of his presidency: He pardoned his predecessor, Nixon. It was an unpopular move with voters, and according to most historians, it contributed greatly to Ford’s loss of the presidential election two years later. Nowadays in American media, it’s often said that Ford’s pardon worked as intended. Steinberg agrees. Ford understood, he says, that the United States was in a time of crisis, which included the increasingly bloody war in Vietnam. The country simply couldn’t cope with anything more. According to Steinberg, a trial of Nixon would have dug Republicans and Democrats so far into the trenches they would not have been able to reconcile. He believes Ford’s pardon was something like the ultimate example of statesmanship. Therefore, he believes Biden should continue to distance himself from the upcoming impeachment.

“As a citizen, I want to see him impeached in the House, and I want to see him removed from office by the Senate. I favor that. But I’m saying, I’m not the president of the United States, Joe Biden is the president, and he has to approach it differently from the way I as a citizen, as a private citizen, approach it. He cannot appear to be the instigator of it all.”

(Additional information: More Republicans support Trump than McConnell, who is now in favor of impeachment proceedings against the president.)

Steinberg is therefore concerned for his country, especially his party, which he believes has descended into fascism. But he believes it when Biden says he wants to unite the nation, heal America. He thinks there’s something to learn from American history. And he believes in the American people.

“I think because most Americans believe in democracy,” he says during the call, “they believe in a rule of law.”

If Biden understands the potential of alliances, and creates an inclusive government, as Steinberg calls it — that is, if he seeks advice from both Democrats and Republicans — then there is a better chance for healing. If one looks at Biden’s career, he is pragmatic, a centrist, so maybe there are opportunities for Steinberg to get what he wants.

“He’s entitled to make his own decisions,” he says. “At the end of the day they’re his decisions. But I think Biden is going to be a wonderful aspect of American healing. Because he is an open person who seeks input, who seeks other opinions, who does not feel that he is the fount of all knowledge, and I think an inclusive administration is important, and I think that is what Joe Biden will implement. I think he’s going to be a very good president.”

For people like Steinberg, there is hope in the darkness of American politics right now.

“History will look back on Joe Biden as the person who began the American period of healing.”



Klokken 8 søndag morgen i Washington holdt en pick-up-truck pænt parkeret på Vermont Street, der fører ned til bykernen med Det Hvide Hus og Senatet. Bilen var prydet med skilte og slagord. “Hvorfor dette åndsvage cover-up?” stod der på et skilt i vinduet,“Det er skørt.” På bilen hang også efterlysninger af børn, der, måtte man forstå, var kidnappet af den satanistiske, pædofile elite, der arbejder i det skjulte for at opnå verdensherredømmet.

“HELP!”, stod der med store hvide bogstaver langs en af bildørene.

Men hjælpen udeblev tilsyneladende. Bilens ejer hørte indlysende til blandt dem, der er overbeviste om sandfærdigheden af QAnon – konspirationen, der var med til at antænde pøbelstormen på den amerikanske kongresbygning 6. januar. Op til den sidste søndag inden Joe Bidens indsættelse drømte Q-tilhængerne og andre hardcore Trump-tilhængere om at gentage det succesfulde stormløb. Flyers for en ‘Million Militia March’ havde floreret med opfordringer til at møde op bevæbnet.

Men i mellemtiden havde en anden magtfaktor i det amerikanske samfund indtaget hovedstaden. Mindre end 100 meter fra den parkerede QAnon-prydede bil holdt en camuflagefarvet militærtruck parkeret på tværs af Vermont Street, bag den stod en mur af betonklodser, bag dem løb et klatresikret hegn på tværs, og bag ved hegnet ventede en gruppe politimænd. Tættere på den amerikanske statsmagts vigtigste bygninger ventede flere mure, flere hegn og 25.000 soldater. Hvilket er flere, end der befinder sig i Afghanistan og Irak tilsammen. Selv Dunkin’ Doughnuts havde overgivet sig og lukket for kaffesalget.

Det lykkedes med andre ord det amerikanske politi og sikkerhedsapparat at forhindre vrede borgere i at udløse voldelige konflikter i gaderne i Washington og USA’s andre magtcentre. Denne gang var de ansvarlige forberedte, og alle konflikter blev afværget.

Den kommende tid er det præsident Joe Bidens ambition at gøre præcis det samme; bare med et sigte, der er større end Washington D. C. Nu handler det om USA som sådan.

Lørdag den 7. november – dagen, hvor det stod klart, at Joe Biden havde vundet det amerikanske præsidentvalg – holdt han en tale i sin hjemstat Delawares største by, Wilmington. Han talte om, at det var på tide at lytte igen og lægge den hårde retorik væk. At det var tid til at se sine politiske modstandere som netop dét og ikke som fjender. Den nyvalgte president-elect, som de kalder det i USA, slog en favnende tone an.

Ambitionen om at genforene de forenede stater har været Joe Bidens helt grundlæggende budskab i de måneder, der er gået siden talen i Wilmington. Igen og igen har han talt om, at han vil være præsident for alle amerikanere, også de millioner, som hellere så Donald Trump tage fire år mere. Han har igen og igen sagt, at det er tid til at helbrede Amerika.

Men det kan jo godt være, det bliver svært.

Onsdag den 6. januar blev kongresbygningen i Washington D.C. overløbet af hundredvis af vrede Trump-støtter, som, opmuntret af deres slagne præsident og store dele af hans republikanske parti afviste Joe Bidens valgsejr. Verden måbede, mens kampklædte mænd tvang kongresmedlemmer og endda vicepræsident Mike Pence til at gemme sig. Fem mennesker, herunder en politibetjent, mistede livet. Optøjerne manifesterede en løs sammenslutning af grupper i det amerikanske samfund, der med voksende hastighed har bevæget sig væk fra fællesskabet, længere ned i internettet, længere ud i medielandskabet, længere over i en parallel virkelighed. Imens er Bidens eget parti ved at stille Trump for en rigsret, anklaget for at opildne til angrebet på Kongressen, og der er dem, der mener, at selv om der er brug for både et åndeligt og retsligt opgør med præsidenten, så vil endnu et juridisk slagsmål kun skubbe amerikanerne yderligere fra hinanden.

Joe Biden står over for et enormt spørgsmål: Hvordan helbreder man et land?

Præcis en uge inden Joe Biden formelt skal indsættes, ringer jeg til Alan Steinberg. Han er pensioneret statskundskabsprofessor ved Monmouth University i New Jersey og tidligere topembedsmand i George W. Bush’ regering. Livstidsrepublikaner og nu politisk kommentator. Han vil helst tale med videofunktionen slået til, siger han under en sixpence og et par virkelig buskede øjenbryn, da vi får kontakt.

“Jeg kan se mig selv og et billede af dig.” Han griner. “Du ser meget bedre ud, end jeg gør, det er derfor, jeg meget hellere vil se på dig.”

Alan Steinberg er bekymret for sit land. Selv om der er lyspunkter.

“Jeg tror, at Joe Biden bliver en virkelig god præsident,” siger han. “Jeg tror, han er præcis, hvad Amerika har brug for lige nu. Men jeg er bekymret. Jeg mener, at de trumpske republikanere er autoritære. Jeg mener, at autoritarisme og fascisme har haft fremgang, ligesom racisme har det, i det republikanske parti.”

Steinberg er en arg kritiker af Trumps republikanske parti, han udgiver klummer og essays i de amerikanske tidsskrifter og sender nyhedsbreve ud til alle sine gamle republikanske venner. Nogle af dem mister han, andre holder fast. Han taler om, hvordan Liz Cheney, magtfuldt medlem af Repræsentanternes Hus og datter af tidligere vicepræsident Dick Cheney, har brudt med præsidenten i forbindelse med den aktuelle rigsretssag. Det er han glad for, Cheney-familien har han kendt nærmest for evigt, og det giver ham et håb om, at det gamle parti stadig findes et sted derinde.

“Den nye konservatisme er ikke konservatisme. Den er autoritarisme og racisme. Så mens jeg tror, at vi til sidst vil triumfere, så er jeg meget bekymret.”

Den 6. januar sad Alan Steinberg klinet til sit fjernsyn.

“Jeg var skrækslagen,” siger han, “for jeg så jo, hvordan de her optøjer kom ud af kontrol. Og jeg ved, hvordan de her oprørere tænker. De har ingen samvittighed. De er onde, hver og en. Det amerikanske demokrati betyder meget for mig, jeg er barnebarn af immigranter. Mine bedsteforældre kom til dette land og skattede demokratiet, retten til at stemme, retsstaten. Disse mennesker er imod retsstaten. De har adopteret den amerikanske fascismes credo. Det er det rigtige ord for det: amerikansk fascisme.”

Demokraterne i Repræsentanternes Hus har nu sammen med ti republikanere, blandt andet altså Liz Cheney, stillet præsidenten for en rigsret. Det er anden gang på to år, han står i den situation, sidst var i efteråret 2019, hvor han stod anklaget for at misbrugt sin magt til at presse den ukrainske præsident, Volodymyr Zelenskij, til at undersøge daværende præsidentkandidat Joe Biden og hans søn, Hunter Biden, for kriminelle aktiviteter. Denne gang beskylder man ham for at have tilskyndet de af hans støtter, som begik ulovligheder den 6. januar, til at “gå ned mod Kongressen,” som han sagde ved et rally samme morgen, “og jeg vil være der sammen med jer. Vi går ned mod Kongressen og hepper på vores modige senatorer og kongresmedlemmer. Vi kommer nok ikke til at heppe så meget på andre af dem, for man kan ikke tage vores land tilbage med svaghed. Man bliver nødt til at vise styrke, man bliver nødt til at være stærk.”

I de efterfølgende dage var Joe Biden så afdæmpet, at alle kunne høre det. Biden holdt i vid udstrækning sine tanker om rigsretten for sig selv for i stedet at tale om bekæmpelse af coronapandemien og den økonomiske krise. Han har talt med Republikanernes leder i senatet, Mitch McConnell, der på dagen for optøjerne brød med Donald Trump, om muligheden for at køre en rigsretssag simultant med Senatets almindelige arbejde. Det giver mening, for coronapandemien kræver, at Bidens regering kommer flyvende ud af starthullerne, og alle nye ministre skal godkendes i Senatet.

Der er mange holdninger til Joe Bidens tilbageholdenhed i spørgsmålet om rigsretssagen mod hans forgænger.

På den ene side er der dem, der mener, at Joe Biden må træde i karakter og stille sig i spidsen for et opgør med præsidenten. At USA ikke kommer videre, før Trump og Trumpismen er besejret. På den anden side er der dem, der mener, at en rigsretssag med under en uge tilbage af Trumps præsidentperiode for det første ikke er besværet værd og for det andet blot er udtryk for venstrefløjens behov for at hævne sig.

Alan Steinberg lægger sig umiddelbart et sted i midten.

“Så længe han ikke står som bagmanden bag en rigsretssag, vil det være fint,” siger han. “Jeg synes, han håndterer det helt rigtigt. Man skal forstå, at Biden er en mand af Senatet. Han vil aldrig se ud, som om han blander sig i Senatets arbejde. Men samtidig vil han ikke sige til Senatet, at de ikke skal dømme Trump. Jeg synes, han går balancegangen helt rigtigt.”

Som mange andre politiske tænkere og observatører i USA har Alan Steinberg dog, også en holdning til rigsretssagen, der taler ind i noget større end ministerudnævnelser, besvær, hævn og respekt for Senatets arbejde. Denne holdning lyder, at en rigsretssag ville gå stik imod opfyldelsen af det, som altså er Joe Bidens formulerede mål: at helbrede Amerika.
64 procent af amerikanerne mener, at Joe Biden har gjort det godt, siden han vandt valget i november. 68 procent mener ikke, at Donald Trump igen bør få en rolle i amerikansk politik.

Det har at gøre med, hvad det er for et Amerika, Joe Biden nu får til opgave at helbrede. Der er ikke kun ét Amerika længere, faktisk kan man måske sige, at der er tre. Der er det blå Amerika, det Demokratiske, der nu har taget magten i både Det Hvide Hus og Kongressens to kamre, men som også nyder stor indflydelse i de amerikanske mainstream-medier og i big tech. Der er det røde Amerika, det Republikanske, som står svagt politisk, men stadig har Fox News og The Wall Street Journal på sin side, ligesom de har penge i ryggen fra tunge, konservative donorer i erhvervslivet. Sidst er der det trumpske Amerika, et Amerika, der ser ud til at bevæge sig længere og længere væk fra de andres virkelighed. Da store dele af det yderste højre blev smidt ud Facebook, Twitter og YouTube i dagene efter den 6. januar, voksede de sociale medier i periferien af markedet voldsomt. Downloads af krypterede besked-apps som Telegram og Signal blev mangedoblet. Det trumpske Amerika er gået under jorden.

Hvordan undgår Joe Biden at skubbe denne tredje gruppe endnu længere væk? Alan Steinberg har et bud, og det indebærer en balancegang. For at forklare, hvad han mener, skruer han tiden tilbage til den amerikanske krise i nyere tid, der minder mest om den, vi står i nu. Nemlig Watergate.

Tilbage i 1974 gik præsident Richard Nixon af som følge af Watergate-skandalen. Han stod, som Donald Trump nu gør det igen, over for en rigsretssag. Så overtog Nixons vicepræsident, Gerald Ford, Det Hvide Hus. I sin indsættelsestale talte han om, at “det lange, amerikanske mareridt nu var ovre”, ord, som nu er berømte i USA. Ford stod overfor en opgave, der drager paralleller til Joe Bidens i dag, og hans ambition var den samme. Han ville hele.

Noget af det første, Ford gjorde efter sin berømte indsættelsestale, var samtidig en af de mest kontroversielle beslutninger i hans præsidentperiode. Han benådede sin forgænger Nixon. Blandt vælgerne var det et upopulært træk, som medvirkede til, mener de fleste historikere, at Ford tabte præsidentsvalget to år senere. I de amerikanske medier møder man for tiden ofte det synspunkt, at Fords benådning virkede efter hensigten. Alan Steinberg er enig. Gerald Ford forstod, siger han, at USA var i en krisetid, der omfattede den stadigt mere blodige krig i Vietnam. Landet kunne simpelthen ikke klare mere. Ifølge Alan Steinberg ville en retssag mod Nixon have gravet Republikanere og Demokrater så langt ned i skyttegravene, at de ikke ville kunne finde op igen. Han mener, at Fords benådning var noget nær det ultimative eksempel på statsmandskunst. Derfor, mener han, bør Joe Biden fortsætte med at holde afstand til den rigsretssag, som er på vej.

“Som borger vil jeg gerne have Trump for en rigsret,” siger han. “Det er jeg for. Men jeg er ikke præsident, det er Joe Biden snart, og han er nødt til at gå anderledes til det, end jeg som borger ville. Han kan ikke blive set som ham, der står bag rigsretssagen.”

Bonusinfo: Flere republikanske vælgere støtter Donald Trump end Mitch McConnell, der altså nu går ind for en rigsretssag mod præsidenten.

Alan Steinberg er altså bekymret for sit land, især sit eget parti, som han mener er faldet i den fascistiske gryde. Men han tror på Joe Biden, når han siger, at han vil samle nationen, helbrede Amerika. Han tror, der er noget at lære i den amerikanske historie. Og så tror han på amerikanerne.

“Ja, jeg tror, at de fleste amerikanere tror på demokratiet,” siger han på videoopkaldet. “De tror på retsstaten.”

Hvis Joe Biden forstår alliancers potentiale og skaber en inkluderende regering, som Alan Steinberg kalder det, altså en, der søger råd fra både demokrater og republikanere, så får helingen bedre chancer. Ser man på Bidens karriere, er han pragmatisk, midtsøgende, så måske er der muligheder for, at Steinberg får det, som han ønsker sig.

“Han har ret til at træffe sine egne beslutninger,” siger han. “Når alt kommer til alt, er det ham, der skal træffe dem. Men jeg tror, at Biden bliver et vidunderligt aspekt af amerikansk heling. For han er et åbent menneske, som søger andres input og holdninger. Som ikke føler, at han er den eneste, der ved noget. Og jeg tror, at en inkluderende regering er vigtigt, og jeg tror, at det er det, Joe Biden vil implementere. Jeg tror, han bliver en rigtig god præsident.”

Der findes et håb i det mørke, der for folk som Alan Steinberg er amerikansk politik lige nu.

“Historien vil se tilbage på Joe Biden som det menneske, der påbegyndte den amerikanske heling.”
Z _

Chefredaktør Lea Korsgaard er i disse dage i Washington D.C. for at dække Joe Bidens indsættelse som præsident den 20. januar. Hun hjalp til med tilblivelsesn af denne historie med den indledende scene fra byen, der altså er under noget nær militær lockdown.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Topics

Poland: Meloni in the White House. Has Trump Forgotten Poland?*

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats

Mauritius: Could Trump Be Leading the World into Recession?

India: World in Flux: India Must See Bigger Trade Picture

Palestine: US vs. Ansarallah: Will Trump Launch a Ground War in Yemen for Israel?

Ukraine: Trump Faces Uneasy Choices on Russia’s War as His ‘Compromise Strategy’ Is Failing

Related Articles

U.K.: The Guardian View on Donald Trump’s Industrial Policy: Inward Turn by Ultimatum

Israel: Trump’s Friendship with Israel Is a Double-Edged Sword

South Africa: The Oligarch Era: Is Democracy Finally Fighting Back in the Land of the Free?

Turkey: Daddy Donald and the Coalition of Napoleons

Israel: With Strong US-Israel Alliance, Criticism of Each Other Should Be Expressed in Private