America’s Theatrics Are More Damaging than Shameful

Published in Cankao Xiaoxi
(China) on 9 February 2021
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Enshia Li. Edited by Gillian Palmer.

 

 

On Feb. 9, the U.S. Senate is set to begin the second impeachment trial of former President Donald Trump. Trump has been accused of inciting the Jan. 6 riot on Capitol Hill. Because the vast majority of Republican Senators support Trump, the American public believe that the chance Trump will actually be convicted is close to zero. Some American media outlets believe that the impending trial is nothing more than political drama.

Unless serious disruptions occur in the impeachment process, the drama will play out according to its current script. Trump is the only president in U.S. history to face two impeachments; the latest count has been brought even though he has left office. While this drama does not hurt Trump very much, objectively speaking, he should be extremely ashamed.

However, as for America’s democratic system, the situation is exactly different. Some supporters of American democracy believe that the second trial is important in and of itself as an expression of democracy, and sends a signal that such behavior from a president is unacceptable. These people want to convey the idea that the American system is still strong. Such an approach is too idealistic given the cruel reality.

First, Trump’s impeachment trial will only serve to intensify the political divide. It is true that Trump lost the election, but with more than 73.8 million votes, he remains the second most popular candidate in U.S. history — second only to Joe Biden, the winner of the presidential race this time around. After Trump’s defeat, political committees set up to challenge the general election results raised approximately $31 million in the last five weeks of 2020. Trump remains a heavyweight player in the political arena.

Though Trump’s reputation was damaged after the riot on Capitol Hill, he still has a base that cannot be ignored. Even The New York Times, which has traditionally expressed negative opinions of Trump, reports that for Trump supporters, the second impeachment proves what they believed all the time, that is to say, the impeachment is nothing but “the culmination of years of unfair treatment by a Washington establishment that was always hostile to Trump and is now trying to end his political career once and for all.” The riot was nothing but a symbol of the politics of hate, and the second impeachment trial will only increase how much Trump supporters resent the system.

Second, Trump’s second impeachment deepens the debate over America’s “core values.” The first point for debate is the Constitution, regarded as the founding document of America. According to reports, Trump’s legal team holds that the trial is unconstitutional, arguing that Trump did not incite violence and that his vocal opposition to the results of the presidential election is protected by the First Amendment. Defense lawyers will also argue that impeaching an outgoing president is, in and of itself, unconstitutional. Even American legal experts do not know how to resolve this issue.

In addition, the trial calls into question core American values such as democratic elections, freedom from violence, and freedom of speech, among others. Whatever the outcome of the trials is, the U.S. political system will split into two, irreconcilable camps. On all of these issues, the impeachment trial will split public opinion ever further.

Third, the trial will highlight the ugly nature of American bipartisan politics. Though a few Republican senators are expected to vote against the interests of the former president, the trial will be decided along party lines. The Democrats are motivated by their own political pursuits — even if Trump cannot be barred from ever running for office again, they hope to tarnish his reputation to the extent that he would have a hard time making a comeback. The Republicans, on the other hand, do not care about justice; even if Trump had incited violence, they would not break from the party line and Trump's popularity.

Everyone has the right to participate in politics; politicians have a duty to satisfy the greatest number of people and make them content. However, the two-party system in the U.S. ensures that politics is merely a tool for the parties themselves. It is nothing more than a bipartisan struggle. Members of Congress do not care for justice, they oppose each other for the sake of politics and disregard the lived realities of common citizens. What they are staging is merely a political farce.

Is the American system good? Only the American people can tell us. A recent survey conducted by the Associated Press and the National Public Opinion Research Center of the University of Chicago found that only 16% of American respondents said that democracy works well or very well. Though the impeachment trial appears to be democracy correcting for its own weaknesses, it is not really doing that. The “beacon of democracy” has been extinguished, and America’s reputation in the eyes of the world has fallen to a new low. The upcoming dramatic trial is not just insulting to the U.S. — it is extremely harmful!

*Editor's Note: On Feb. 13, the Senate voted to find Donald Trump not guilty of an article of impeachment charging him with inciting a riot at the U.S. Capitol.


参考快评 | 这幕大戏对美国“侮辱性不大,但伤害性极强”
当地时间9日,美国参议院将正式启动对前总统特朗普的第二次弹劾审判。特朗普面临的指控是涉嫌煽动1月6日发生在国会山的骚乱。美国舆论普遍认为,由于共和党参议员大多反对弹劾特朗普,特朗普最终被定罪的可能性几乎为零。有美国媒体不禁发问:对特朗普的审判究竟是要追究其“严重罪行”,还是说只是一场“政治大戏”?
倘若弹劾进程不出现戏剧性变化,按照目前的脚本走下去,更有可能是一场政治大戏。特朗普是美国历史上唯一两次受到弹劾审判的总统,而且是在卸任后仍然面临审判。这幕大戏对特朗普伤害性不大,但侮辱性极强。
然而,对美国及其民主制度来说,情况可能刚好相反。有美式民主的拥趸认为,对特朗普的第二次审判是必不可少的“民主宣泄”,希望借此表明特朗普的此类行为“不会逃脱民主的控制”,进而向美国社会和全世界传递“美国制度依然牢固”的信号。这些人的愿望固然美好,但恐抵不过残酷的现实。
首先,对特朗普的弹劾审判将会加剧美国社会的撕裂。
特朗普输掉了2020年美国大选,但他的得票数超过7380万张,是美国历史上获得第二高普选票的候选人,仅次于这次当选的拜登。这同时意味着,特朗普创造了最高票落选总统的纪录。在大选失败后,特朗普为推翻大选结果成立的“拯救美国”政治行动委员会,在2020年的最后5周时间里筹集到大约3100万美元,与他本人在2020年早些时候的连任竞选中的筹款能力相当,这表明其仍是重量级的政治玩家。
即便在1月6日国会山骚乱后,特朗普的声誉受损,但是他依然有着不可忽视的民意基础。就连向来与特朗普不睦的《纽约时报》也承认,对特朗普支持者而言,二次弹劾证明了他们坚信的一切,即“多年来一直对特朗普怀有敌意的华盛顿对他的不公平待遇到达了顶峰,现在他们试图一劳永逸地终结他的政治生涯”。当初国会山骚乱的发生,实质上就是美国“怨恨政治”的一次发泄;如今对特朗普进行第二次弹劾审判,只会加深特朗普铁杆支持者的怨恨情绪。
其次,对特朗普的弹劾审判将加剧美国“核心价值”的争议。
首当其冲的是被视为美国国本的宪法。据报道,特朗普律师团队将以此次审判违宪作为辩护策略的核心,论证特朗普并没有煽动暴力,其反对大选结果的言论受宪法第一修正案保护。辩护律师还将着力论述,对已卸任总统进行弹劾审判本身就违宪。而对此举是否合乎宪法,美国法学界也莫衷一是。
除了宪法制度外,此次弹劾审判还牵扯到民主选举、反对暴力、言论自由等所谓的美国“核心价值”。不管最终结局如何,美国政界、乃至整个社会都会形成壁垒森严的两大阵营,无法接受对方的主张。对于美国宪法的合理性、民主选举的公正性、反对暴力的严肃性和言论自由的边界性,对特朗普的弹劾审判不仅无法就此在美国社会形成最大公约数,反而会加剧美国民众认知上的混乱与分歧。
第三,对特朗普的弹劾审判将凸显美国两党政治的丑态。
尽管预计会有共和党议员倒戈,但对特朗普的弹劾审判,依然会是共和党和民主党之间的两党对决。民主党人对卸任总统发起弹劾,更多的动机还是出于“政治追杀”,即便不能终结特朗普的政治生命,也希望将特朗普的政治名声彻底搞臭,让他难以东山再起。至于共和党,也无意于维护正义。即便特朗普有煽动暴力之嫌,大多数共和党人也对特朗普的政治影响力和群众基本盘心存忌惮,不愿与其决裂。
政治是众人之事,理应集合众人之力量,从政者也应努力争取最大多数人的最大幸福。然而,在美国两党制的制度设计中,政治变成了维护政党私利的工具,最终沦为两党恶斗。出于一党之利、甚至是一己之私,两党议员不问是非、不顾苍生,为了反对而反对、为了阻止而阻止,上演的无疑是活脱脱的政治闹剧。
美国制度到底好不好,美国民众最有发言权。美联社与芝加哥大学全国民意研究中心最近进行的调查发现,只有16%的美国受访者说,民主运作良好或非常好。即将登场的弹劾审判,看似是要对美式民主进行一次自我纠错,但实际上并非如此。鉴于所谓的“民主灯塔”早已黯然熄灭,美国在世界的形象早已跌至新低,即将上演的弹劾审判大戏对美国侮辱性不大,但伤害性极强!
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Afghanistan: The Trump Problem

Russia: Political Analyst Reveals the Real Reason behind US Tariffs*

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Topics

Afghanistan: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Russia: Political Analyst Reveals the Real Reason behind US Tariffs*

Poland: Meloni in the White House. Has Trump Forgotten Poland?*

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats

Mauritius: Could Trump Be Leading the World into Recession?

Related Articles

Afghanistan: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Russia: Political Analyst Reveals the Real Reason behind US Tariffs*

Poland: Meloni in the White House. Has Trump Forgotten Poland?*

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary